tharpdevenport:
We both have a personal opinion on this and neither is a truism.
That's not what "truism" means.
Sigh. The internet.
Okay, one: My above quote doesn't define anything. So you falsely quoted me to tell me I'm wrong.
Two: Your "correction" on my use of the word, is incorrect. I stated (and this is the excerpt you used):
when compared to the best episodes of the show it obviously owes a lot to -- "Star Trek: The Next Generation" -- it's still nothing great. And the re-watch value isn't particularly high.
Which you replied (in full):
In order for my statement to not be true, it would have to have been written as a
fact that is in arguable, like the sky is blue and two plus two equals four. So it's obvious it is exactly what it is: a personal opinion.
So, now we got to the word "truism".
The word as the definition that comes up at the top of a Google search (that doesn't cite the source_:
"a statement that is obviously true and says nothing new or interesting"
From the Oxford dictionary online:
"a statement that is obviously true and says nothing new or interesting"
Merriam-Webster dictionary online:
"an undoubted or self-evident truth especially : one too obvious for mention"
Okay, so my statement was a personal opinion and not a fact so it's not a truism. Then you tell me my opinion is wrong, but my opinion by the very
definition of the word
opinion does not mean my opinion is "Not true". In order for it to have not been true, it would have to have been passed off as a fact, which -- again -- it was not. But your post of "Not true" tells me and the readers that I am in factual error, so you're passing it off as a truism, which is the only way I could be wrong.
Good tap-dancing Lord, the things one has to waste their life on, on the internet.