Jason Alexander's a sci-fi fan, and was on an episode of Star Trek: Voyager called "Think Tank." He's also worked with Seth before. Hell, getting a part, no matter how small, in a new and popular science fiction show? That's a good thing. Aside from all that, he has an active career, so while he hasn't achieved the same levels of fame since Seinfeld, his work has been steady, and many of his roles memorable. I'm not sure you can ask for much more than that as an actor.How did Alexander not have a bigger career outside of "Seinfeld?" He was great on that show. Somehow playing a Rhino bartender is not something I think he ever thought he would be doing at this stage of his career.
Jason
It's not uncommon today for naval vessels to have multiple lounges, mess halls and other recreational areas shipboard.And, apparently, this moderate-ly sized ship has this mess hall and an elegant restaurant in it?
This seems like the kind of role someone like him would do for the fun of it, not because he has to. Usually when you see someone like him doing a role like this, it's because they're a fan of the series, or are working with a friend. From the above posts it sounds like both might be true in this case.How did Alexander not have a bigger career outside of "Seinfeld?" He was great on that show. Somehow playing a Rhino bartender is not something I think he ever thought he would be doing at this stage of his career.
Jason
Yeah, that was him. It's just the part was so brief you could almost blink and miss it.I noticed Will Sasso in the credits. Did I miss him, or was his scene cut? His character is supposed to be Mooska, who runs the restaurant.
Sounds like you missed him. There's a scene with him chatting with Alara just before Dann shows up for their date.I noticed Will Sasso in the credits. Did I miss him, or was his scene cut? His character is supposed to be Mooska, who runs the restaurant.
How did Alexander not have a bigger career outside of "Seinfeld?" He was great on that show. Somehow playing a Rhino bartender is not something I think he ever thought he would be doing at this stage of his career.
Jason
Yeah, MacFarlane said he's intentionally left transporters out of the Union. Mostly because he likes the idea of everyone leaving the ship via shuttles, and that's fine by me.
Though it is odd they have replicators but no transporters, given the two devices operate on similar principals. But I don't let that bother me since the replicators are mostly just there for plot convenience and that's fine too.
Not necessarily. Synthesizers could function by nanomachine assembly of objects.Yeah, MacFarlane said he's intentionally left transporters out of the Union. Mostly because he likes the idea of everyone leaving the ship via shuttles, and that's fine by me.
Though it is odd they have replicators but no transporters, given the two devices operate on similar principals. But I don't let that bother me since the replicators are mostly just there for plot convenience and that's fine too.
Ditto. I don't like transporters, unless they use some kind of space warp or wormhole technology. Breaking people down and reassembling them essentially kills them. And they've barely touched the surface of things that could go wrong with a transporter broadcast-- like, what if every ship in the fleet had their transporter set to receive while you were beaming out?When I created my own SF universe, I also had replicators but no transporters (at least not for living beings), with the reasoning that the technology could not reproduce a personality.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.