• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The OFFICIAL STNG-R general discussion thread!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know, maybe they should consider to include seamless branching, just like in TOS for the purists.

Let's name it: The 4 foot model IS a continuity issue. The 6 foot model is how the Enterprise is supposed to look.

I am all for keeping the pace and the shots etc. Just update it with a decent CGI model like that warp out shot from "Inner Light".
 
Forgive me, I thought we were discussing the relevant format. I don't think closeout prices for old DVD releases really make your argument. When TNG-HD is released, the prices will likely be roughly the same on either side of the ocean, so I don't really see your point.

My point is simple. US prices are way too high. European prices are A okay!

Prices won't be roughly the same. They never have been and still aren't as I demonstrated in my post above. And that is part of the reason why some studios still insist on region coding their DVDs and Blu Rays.
 
Maybe like this: I put this together in 5 minutes:

Old:
oldfi.jpg


New:
new1tu.jpg


I know... have to rework the illumination, but you get the idea... ;)
 
Last edited:
There are a couple of good reviews of
"Star Trek: TTNG – The Next Level" Blu-ray sampler disc here: with a nice screenshot of the LCARS menu design showing the airdate as well as the stardate:
and of interesting note:
along with the audio remixed in DTS-HD Master Audio 7.1 there is also the 2.0 mix and
Optional DD 2.0 dubs are provided in German, Spanish, French and Japanese. Optional subtitles are provided in English (SDH), German, Spanish, French, Japanese, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish.
http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/53258/next-generation-next-level/
I think the foreign language dubs would allow a fan to concentrate on the Sound FX and music rather than the dialogue in an episode seen dozens of times.

and another 1st impression from Trekmovie:
mentioning:
worth highlighting is the sound, which has been remixed in 7.1 DTS-HD. I was surprised at how much this (combined with the updated looks) created a more cinematic experience.
http://trekmovie.com/2012/01/20/fir...he-next-generation-the-next-level-on-blu-ray/

http://tng.trekcore.com/bluray/index.html#sfin_ex
 
OK folks! The second of our TrekCore exclusives is up,

Wow this was nice:
HD SCREENSHOTS OF SEASON ONE BONUS FEATURE
a preview to the Season One Blu-Ray set out later this year.
includes a number of behind-the-scenes shots showing blue-screen filming from the pilot. The inclusion of this footage in the trailer may well be an indication of new special-features to be included on the Season One collection.
The fact that they not only have HD behind-the-scenes footage but that it is from the Visual Effects of the Ent-D various passes from motion control is cool. I hope they are able to get a lot of behind-the-scenes footage from Viacom-owned "Entertainment Tonight" visits to the set during season 1 as well as vintage interviews from the Electronic Press Kit (EPK's) Paramount made at that time.

And this inclusion of VFX footage shows how the compositing was done from the camera negatives. Each pass was composited using modern state-of-the-art digital compositing.
 
anyway so are they gonna remaster this TNG or not? whats that goofy pic of the energy beam from farpoint thats posted previously. it looks awful. tell me please thats not remastered.

Yes, it's being remastered, the sampler set comes out next Tuesday. The picture of the energy beam going to Farpiont is apparently from the new effects and the flaws on the saucer rim aside the shot looks perfect and beautiful compared to what's on the DVD now from the original show. (The color timing of the original show was very green.)

Not to mention the shot fixes the "problem" with the energy beam coming from the ship's Captain's Yacht Calypso in the original version to it now coming (more appropriately) from the phaser bank.

The shot does look odd, the smooth edge of the saucer rim and the the lighting from the beam looks over done. Is that, for sure, the real thing in the finished disc or is this possibly an "early draft" of what is on the final DVD?

Eitherway, it still looks nice compared to what we've had forever now.

TNGCOMPARE.jpg

Looking at those 2 shots side by side, I'm leaning more towards it being 100% CGI or at least a different model shot. The window light pattern on the saucer is different between the shots.
 
The new shot imho looks like someone had a go at painting over the original (1st) image and the result is frankly very poor. If ever something needed an incy wincy bit of CGI it is the energy beam shot posted above. The new shot is worse than the old!

I don't think it is the 2ft model, I think someone has gone over the original image with photoshop or something.
 
TNGCOMPARE.jpg


Looking at those 2 shots side by side, I'm leaning more towards it being 100% CGI or at least a different model shot. The window light pattern on the saucer is different between the shots.

New shot is definitely worse than the old one and is almost certainly CGI. The windows have an almost warped pattern on the neck and much of the detail around the neck is drowned out by overshadowing.

Looks like they're making the same mistakes they did with TOS-R. Overlighting the models which causes dark shadows that drown out some of the details.
 
TNGCOMPARE.jpg


Looking at those 2 shots side by side, I'm leaning more towards it being 100% CGI or at least a different model shot. The window light pattern on the saucer is different between the shots.

New shot is definitely worse than the old one and is almost certainly CGI. The windows have an almost warped pattern on the neck and much of the detail around the neck is drowned out by overshadowing.

Looks like they're making the same mistakes they did with TOS-R. Overlighting the models which causes dark shadows that drown out some of the details.

I like the newer shot overall, the beam is correctly placed, and it's lit better, reflecting on the hull like they did in TOS-R. What I disagree with is the model itself and its look, which could be done better in my opinion with a CG replacement.

What I do like is the ship isn't 100% illuminated at all conceivable angles. Somehow that looks better with at least some shadows.
 
Ya, the new one is 'better' but I still wouldn't call it 'good'. It amazes me how great the D can look at some angles and how bad it looks from others. I guess i should be used to it, it has felt that way for 25 years now.

IMO anything that makes the primary hull look thinner, the better, and conversely anything that accentuates the big oval nature of it, detracts from it. This one is about the worst angle possible.
 
I like the newer shot overall, the beam is correctly placed...

Taste is up to the individual consumer. But who actually gives a shit about the beam placement? Does the beam placement make or break your enjoyment of Encounter at Farpoint?

...and it's lit better, reflecting on the hull like they did in TOS-R. What I disagree with is the model itself and its look, which could be done better in my opinion with a CG replacement.

But it drowns out ninety percent of the detail. The Enterprise is one of the stars of the show and it doesn't make me think highly of their collective competence when they use a cheap CG model and then try to hide it in shadows.

What I do like is the ship isn't 100% illuminated at all conceivable angles. Somehow that looks better with at least some shadows.

Personally, I miss all the detail that was discernible at 480i but is now lost with the move to 1080p. :shrug:
 
TNGCOMPARE.jpg


Looking at those 2 shots side by side, I'm leaning more towards it being 100% CGI or at least a different model shot. The window light pattern on the saucer is different between the shots.

New shot is definitely worse than the old one and is almost certainly CGI. The windows have an almost warped pattern on the neck and much of the detail around the neck is drowned out by overshadowing.

Looks like they're making the same mistakes they did with TOS-R. Overlighting the models which causes dark shadows that drown out some of the details.

No, it's the original shot. I overlaid them and they match up. They did some rather heavy editing on the lighting though...perhaps a bit too much 'image manipulation' considering how smooth the rim of the saucer looks. They need to restrain themselves and not scrub things until the details are lost.
 
No, it's the original shot. I overlaid them and they match up. They did some rather heavy editing on the lighting though...perhaps a bit too much 'image manipulation' considering how smooth the rim of the saucer looks. They need to restrain themselves and not scrub things until the details are lost.

No way that's the same model. Go look and compare the other screen caps with the DVD screen shots.

Out of everything that is there, why would you take one scene and scrub the life out of it to where it looks so much different from the rest of the footage?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top