• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Next Big Hollywood Remake

Columbo, starring Harrison Ford

Nah... He's not genial enough. I could see Jeff Bridges doing it though

Jeff Bridges as Columbo with the right script would actually be pretty awesome.
Yes it would. He's got the right demeanor

Also, resurrect Dirty Harry with Josh Brolin

This, not so much.

Personally, I think Harry is too tied to Eastwood to ever successfully remake the character. But if they did, Hugh Jackman. He kind of looks like he could be Eastwood's son.
They'd have to wait until Clint is long dead, & I did consider Hugh Jackman, because he looks so much like a young Clint, but Hugh really hasn't got the innate grit of Clint Eastwood, that is necessary for Dirty Harry, Wolverine aside. Whenever Hugh plays tough & gritty, it tends to read a bit phony to me, It's pretty tough to be as gritty as Clint, which is why no one would dare try it until he's gone

Josh Brolin's grittiness is a bit more like Nick Nolte in 48 Hours than like Dirty Harry, but it's close



As movies:
  • Xena: Warrior Princess
I actually thought that could easily have been made into a movie
 
The more I hear about remakes, the more I think it's all about people desperately clinging on the past, not being able to let go and move on. Perhaps they have been left unsatisfied for some reason and desperately look for that missing piece they never received. Hugh Jackman as Dirty Harry just because he looks a bit like a young Clint Eastwood? Just what on earth would you gain from that? Except for a TINY visual similarity, he is nothing like Eastwood. So what's the point of doing a cop movie with him calling it Dirty Harry?

I understand the producer's POV on remakes. Name recognition, new generation, bla bla. The writer's and director's POV already becomes fuzzy to me. Just why do you feel the need to make a remake of something else and not make something original instead. But the audience's POV? It's a mystery!
 
I keep waiting for DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS, FANTASTIC VOYAGE, and LOGAN'S RUN, all of which strike me as prime remake material. Maybe SOYLENT GREEN, too, if only because it would be a good excuse to reissue the original novel. (Although, sadly, Harry Harrison is no longer around to benefit from a remake.)
 
^^^
The Day of the Triffids was remade as a BBC miniseries in 2009. A Fantastic Voyage remake is in development with James Cameron as producer and Shawn Levy attached as director. A remake of Logan's Run is likewise in development. Nicolas Winding Refn was attached to direct from a script by Andrew Baldwin, but Refn has left the project and Ken Levine, who created BioShock, has been hired to write a new script. When, or if, the latter projects escape from development and actually get made of course remains to be seen.
 
This, not so much.

Personally, I think Harry is too tied to Eastwood to ever successfully remake the character. But if they did, Hugh Jackman. He kind of looks like he could be Eastwood's son.
They'd have to wait until Clint is long dead, & I did consider Hugh Jackman, because he looks so much like a young Clint, but Hugh really hasn't got the innate grit of Clint Eastwood, that is necessary for Dirty Harry, Wolverine aside. Whenever Hugh plays tough & gritty, it tends to read a bit phony to me, It's pretty tough to be as gritty as Clint, which is why no one would dare try it until he's gone

Josh Brolin's grittiness is a bit more like Nick Nolte in 48 Hours than like Dirty Harry, but it's close



As movies:
  • Xena: Warrior Princess
I actually thought that could easily have been made into a movie


I agree with you on both points. I'd cast Brolin over Jackman as Dirty Harry and I like Jackman (though he might do better box office...).
 
I keep waiting for DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS, FANTASTIC VOYAGE, and LOGAN'S RUN, all of which strike me as prime remake material. Maybe SOYLENT GREEN, too, if only because it would be a good excuse to reissue the original novel. (Although, sadly, Harry Harrison is no longer around to benefit from a remake.)

It wasn't exactly a remake but Innerspace played heavily on the Fantastic Voyage premise. And I know you like B-movies, so if you ever chance upon Lance Henriksen's Antibody you can see a real low-rent riff on the idea.
 
The more I hear about remakes, the more I think it's all about people desperately clinging on the past, not being able to let go and move on. Perhaps they have been left unsatisfied for some reason and desperately look for that missing piece they never received. Hugh Jackman as Dirty Harry just because he looks a bit like a young Clint Eastwood? Just what on earth would you gain from that? Except for a TINY visual similarity, he is nothing like Eastwood. So what's the point of doing a cop movie with him calling it Dirty Harry?

I understand the producer's POV on remakes. Name recognition, new generation, bla bla. The writer's and director's POV already becomes fuzzy to me. Just why do you feel the need to make a remake of something else and not make something original instead. But the audience's POV? It's a mystery!
Yeah, I know. I too would much rather go see something new & inventive than a remake, but remakes & sequel franchises aren't going anywhere. Batman, Superman, Bond, Star Trek. The list is endless. So they should at least pick worthy things to do it with
 
WKRP, though I think they've already tried twice without much success. The problem was the lack of a personality like Johnny Fever.

Happy Days. Honestly surprised they haven't done it yet.

Magnum P.I, though Hollywood would likely turn it into a parody of sorts, much like they did with Starsky & Hutch rather than an honest interpretation like Miami Vice.
 
The Incredible Shrinking Man is overdue for a remake, too.

(The Lily Tomlin version doesn't count!)
 
The Bruce Lee thread got me thinking that it's surprising Enter The Dragon hasn't been done yet.

The Last Starfighter has potential, especially since videogames are a lot more ubiquitous than they were in 1984.

I don't particularly like Cameron, but I'd like to see what he could do with Metropolis.

I know there's on-again/off-again talk about a Top Gun sequel, but I think they'd be better served to just reboot at this point. There's a lot of potential intrigue there involving the school's relevancy and the future of aviation and UAVs. I'd love to see Ridley do this.

Also, I expect a true reboot of Jaws any day now.

Yeah, I know. I too would much rather go see something new & inventive than a remake, but remakes & sequel franchises aren't going anywhere. Batman, Superman, Bond, Star Trek. The list is endless. So they should at least pick worthy things to do it with
How do you classify "new" and "innovative?" Both terms are ultimately arbitrary in nature. And just because a story is an old one, doesn't mean it can't be made new again, nor does it imply the filmmaker can't innovate with it.

People act like remakes and reboots are a new trend. They aren't.

If you look at the 120 years (or so) of filmmaking and exclude everything that's a remake, reboot, retelling, sequel, adaption, etc., you're not left with much.

And, never mind the last few millennia of storytelling...

How about recasting The Princess Bride?
Inconceivable!

Paul Wright is the obvious choice fro Fezzik. Also, it would be a nice touch to have Elwes as Grandpa.*

*Savage might not be old enough.
 
The Bruce Lee thread got me thinking that it's surprising Enter The Dragon hasn't been done yet.

The Last Starfighter has potential, especially since videogames are a lot more ubiquitous than they were in 1984.

I don't particularly like Cameron, but I'd like to see what he could do with Metropolis.

I know there's on-again/off-again talk about a Top Gun sequel, but I think they'd be better served to just reboot at this point. There's a lot of potential intrigue there involving the school's relevancy and the future of aviation and UAVs. I'd love to see Ridley do this.

Also, I expect a true reboot of Jaws any day now.

Yeah, I know. I too would much rather go see something new & inventive than a remake, but remakes & sequel franchises aren't going anywhere. Batman, Superman, Bond, Star Trek. The list is endless. So they should at least pick worthy things to do it with
How do you classify "new" and "innovative?" Both terms are ultimately arbitrary in nature. And just because a story is an old one, doesn't mean it can't be made new again, nor does it imply the filmmaker can't innovate with it.

People act like remakes and reboots are a new trend. They aren't.

If you look at the 120 years (or so) of filmmaking and exclude everything that's a remake, reboot, retelling, sequel, adaption, etc., you're not left with much.

And, never mind the last few millennia of storytelling...

How about recasting The Princess Bride?
Inconceivable!

Paul Wright is the obvious choice fro Fezzik. Also, it would be a nice touch to have Elwes as Grandpa.*

*Savage might not be old enough.
I read that there was recently(?) a reading with Rob Reiner as Grandpa, Fred Savage reprising his role, and Cary Elwes as Humperdinck. I bet that was fun.
 
WKRP, though I think they've already tried twice without much success. The problem was the lack of a personality like Johnny Fever.

Pirate Radio hit a lot of the same notes. I keep posting these things, I need to make a thread about spiritual successors. :)

Ohh, good point. Yeah, I guess it did. I could kind of see Philip Seymour Hoffman as a good Johnny Fever :)


Happy Days. Honestly surprised they haven't done it yet.
That 70s Show was sort of a take on Happy Days, wasn't it?

I wouldn't really say so. It felt more like a parody of the 70's, plus different decade.
 
HAPPY DAYS would be tricky. The original was a 1970s exercise in 1950s nostalgia. So would a 21st century version be all about nostalgia for the Seventies or the Fifties?

You'd be two steps removed from the era you're celebrating, like a photocopy of a photocopy . . . .
 
^As mentioned above, That 70's show pretty much fills that criteria.

Enter the Dragon
was remade, as Mortal Kombat.

Regarding "original" stuff, Pacific Rim is a blockbuster category movie that's not a sequel. It doesn't seem to be lighting up the box office though.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top