I thought it was only with a £75 a month contract, or am I mistaken?It IS free on a contract. See O2's website for details. And wait till the third-party apps take off, that's what will make the iPhone.
Reading this on a Star Trek BBS is pretty damn funny. What font is the ship's registry supposed to be again?
Find a post of mine where I argue the toss over something so trivial and you'll have a point.
I'll decide when I have a point, thanks all the same.
I don't give a damn whether you posted that or not, any more than I give a damn about your trolling or your blanket derision of Apple customers.
I'm annoyed at paying £20pm for my contract, when if I'd have gone for a non-smartphone it would have been £15pm. £75 a month is just ridiculous.I thought it was only with a £75 a month contract, or am I mistaken?It IS free on a contract. See O2's website for details. And wait till the third-party apps take off, that's what will make the iPhone.
I *think* it's free on the top two contracts, but I could be wrong. It's certainly free on the £75 one, as you say.
I'll decide when I have a point, thanks all the same.
No no, you really have to make one first.
Yes, your seething, bilesome nonchalance in this matter is quite evident.
I'm annoyed at paying £20pm for my contract, when if I'd have gone for a non-smartphone it would have been £15pm. £75 a month is just ridiculous.
So how long until Apple's contract with the lousy (at least in Florida and Alabama) AT&T expires and you can pick this phone up with another provider in the US?
My contract with 3 is up a year from now; by then O2 exclusivity will dry up, so maybe my next upgrade will be to the iPhone...
My contract with 3 is up a year from now; by then O2 exclusivity will dry up, so maybe my next upgrade will be to the iPhone...
I agree; as long as I can get a pay-as-you-go one, or get one to slot my Tesco Mobile SIM card into. I think O2's PAYG prices are going to be expensive.
I'm paying £15/mo. with 3 now for 100 texts and 200min.; the cheapest O2 iPhone plan is complete rubbish by comparison -- free data? Who cares? I'm interested because of the combination of iPod and Phone that has a better UI than my Nokia 6288 slider, so it'll either be under my existing plan or PAYG. Otherwise my new 3G Nano will still be working I'm sure...
What's a gadget lover to do?![]()
- Application processor by Apple: 65nm (vs 90nm), Higher-Clocked ARM11, PowerVR SGX 3D core (likely SGX 520) with OpenGL ES 2.0 support, PowerVR VXD (likely VXD 330 with plain VGA support; less likely VXD 370 with 1080p support). In-house System-on-Chip logic, music playback logic, etc.
- 3G Baseband: Likely HSDPA from Infineon (as for the 2G-capable model) on 65nm; possibly a custom chip with no redundant multimedia functionality. Too early for 45nm given certification. Plausible alternatives include Icera, Qualcomm, Broadcom, and InterDigital, all of which are more likely to be the case if HSUPA is supported (because their solutions offer higher upload speeds). Qualcomm and Broadcom are much less likely if the latest leak from engadget implying Infineon RF is correct, but others still plausible.
- 'Connectivity' Wireless: Bluetooth is very likely Bluecore6 from CSR (was Bluecore4); GPS from Broadcom is very plausible given their claimed power numbers are the lowest we could find, if the 3G does have GPS; WiFi is unlikely to receive a significant upgrade, likely still Marvell or CSR or Broadcom, as Atheros’ disruptive solution came too late.
- Analogue: Wolfson’s audio chip design loss seems to be aimed at iPods, not iPhones, so it’s relatively likely to still be in the 3G-capable model and deliver the exact same sound quality as the original. If so, power management and touchscreen is unlikely to be integrated in a single chip.
- Other things to watch for: OLED screen (significant battery life boost but no reliable indication it’ll be used however), whether the OpenGL ES 2.0 functionality is exposed on launch, and obviously potential software upgrades.
- Costs: Nothing fundamental that would make the 3G iPhone significantly more expensive to manufacture than the 2G on first sight.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.