Photon torpedoes on the other hand have explosive yields more comparable to a city-busting thermonuclear weapon.
When the hell have we ever seen this? All the photon torpedo blasts I can recall looked less powerful than the Narada's missiles.
Photon torpedoes on the other hand have explosive yields more comparable to a city-busting thermonuclear weapon.
In Star Trek XI alone we see single photon torpedoes cracking Klingon battlecruisers to splinters, and the brilliant blue-white flashes as several detonate within the Narada's arms.Photon torpedoes on the other hand have explosive yields more comparable to a city-busting thermonuclear weapon.
When the hell have we ever seen this? All the photon torpedo blasts I can recall looked less powerful than the Narada's missiles.
What exactly made the Narada's torpedoes look "powerful" to you? Was it the nifty cluster bomb effect, the wimpy explosions that looked as though they could be produced by modern artillery shells, or the surprisingly small holes and scorch marks they left of the hulls of the Kelvin and the Enterprise?
[
Anyway, I think we would have to take into account that torpedo yields themselves have been pretty inconsistent. We have good examples of torpedoes churning out giganto-huge explosions, but on the other hand, we've seen plenty of torpedoes in DS9, VOY, TWOK, TUC, and FC that look comparable to the Narada's explosions, in that they were pretty small and far from thermonuclear. Even quantum torpedoes, for some reason, don't produce the same yield as the TOS photon torpedoes.
There's really no way to contain or focus an explosion like that - you kind of want it to explode. Especially in space where you might miss your target by a kilometer or two, but still want that shot to be effective.So maybe the power isn't in the explosion, but perhaps focused (concentrated) into a smaller area? It could explain why torpedoes could be used in an atmosphere without igniting the planet. *shrug*
Well, we know photons have a variable yield, and Kirk did say "Listen carefully". Perhaps that particular torpedo had no reactants in it, and was set for a simple kinetic energy strike. After all, Kirk and co. wanted to live.And let's not forget Star trek V, where a torpedo knocks over a couple of rocks. When they're, y'know, trying to kill God.
not to mention the interrogation chamber where Nero tortures Pike
Simply the bowels of the ship, complete with water ballast. Not too different to the bowels of any pirate ship.
There's really no way to contain or focus an explosion like that - you kind of want it to explode. Especially in space where you might miss your target by a kilometer or two, but still want that shot to be effective.So maybe the power isn't in the explosion, but perhaps focused (concentrated) into a smaller area? It could explain why torpedoes could be used in an atmosphere without igniting the planet. *shrug*
You mean it wouldn't make sense.Simply the bowels of the ship, complete with water ballast. Not too different to the bowels of any pirate ship.
And that would make sense because.......the ship is in space.....
i wondered if the4 water was some type of by product of the mining process.
especially if they just didnt mine but procrssed the ore.
Romulan males always miss the bowl.i wondered if the4 water was some type of by product of the mining process.
especially if they just didnt mine but procrssed the ore.
Take the water (and thus an orientation dictated by gravity) away and the need for ballast goes away, as well.
Romulan males always miss the bowl.i wondered if the4 water was some type of by product of the mining process.
especially if they just didnt mine but procrssed the ore.
You mean it wouldn't make sense.Simply the bowels of the ship, complete with water ballast. Not too different to the bowels of any pirate ship.
And that would make sense because.......the ship is in space.....
Ballast in a sailing ship serves two purposes:
1) It creates a low center of gravity, keeping the ship upright in the water and making it more resistant to rollover.
2) It causes a ship sailing empty (without cargo) to ride low enough in the water that it can be steered effectively.
Take the water (and thus an orientation dictated by gravity) away and the need for ballast goes away, as well.
As far as the pools of water, you might be onto something. The Narada presumably sat around for 25 years, with the Klingons for some reason unable to strip it down and learn its secrets. I imagine it might've gotten very cold in there, and all that water might simply be condensation.The more I think about this movie the less I like it. Pools of liquid inside a starship, beaming people halfway across the solar system, Nero lurking around the galaxy for 20+ years waiting for Spock Prime to arrive, and Kirk's experience as a starfleet officer wiped out just to name a few problems with this movie.
And don't get me started on the Narada. I agree with a earlier post that it would have been more interesting if the Jellyfish was Nero's ship and it wiped out entire fleets with it's late 24th/early 25th century technology.
What do you need a drilling rig for when the Enterprise-D used it's phasers to drill into a planets crust. You don't need that big of a hole to drop that small container of red matter into.
As far as the pools of water, you might be onto something. The Narada presumably sat around for 25 years, with the Klingons for some reason unable to strip it down and learn its secrets. I imagine it might've gotten very cold in there, and all that water might simply be condensation.The more I think about this movie the less I like it. Pools of liquid inside a starship, beaming people halfway across the solar system, Nero lurking around the galaxy for 20+ years waiting for Spock Prime to arrive, and Kirk's experience as a starfleet officer wiped out just to name a few problems with this movie.
And don't get me started on the Narada. I agree with a earlier post that it would have been more interesting if the Jellyfish was Nero's ship and it wiped out entire fleets with it's late 24th/early 25th century technology.
What do you need a drilling rig for when the Enterprise-D used it's phasers to drill into a planets crust. You don't need that big of a hole to drop that small container of red matter into.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.