I think at the time, I took the all caps as being like a telegram or teletype from the Source.
The idea of using suspended animation in conjunction with a hyperdrive isn't that wacky if one assumes the FTL capability isn't that much faster than light. If you can travel only two or three times the speed of light it could still take you an extended period of time to cover any significant distance.
The idea of using suspended animation in conjunction with a hyperdrive isn't that wacky if one assumes the FTL capability isn't that much faster than light. If you can travel only two or three times the speed of light it could still take you an extended period of time to cover any significant distance.
The idea of using suspended animation in conjunction with a hyperdrive isn't that wacky if one assumes the FTL capability isn't that much faster than light. If you can travel only two or three times the speed of light it could still take you an extended period of time to cover any significant distance.
Yep. They did it in Alien.
They did it in Lost In Space (1965-1968) with the Jupiter 2 too.![]()
They did it in Lost In Space (1965-1968) with the Jupiter 2 too.![]()
Well, not exactly. In the original pilot, the Jupiter 2 was a slower-than-light ship expected to take years to reach its destination, and it drifted for years when thrown off-course. Whe they retooled it for the series and added Dr. Smith as a stowaway, he didn't have a cryochamber to preserve him for years, so they retconned in a hyperdrive so that the J2 could make the interstellar journey in hours.
For that matter, I'm unclear on whether Alien is a retcon in this regard. I had the impression in the first movie that they didn't have FTL at all, that it was only later movies that added it as a retcon (or as an advance invented while Ripley was away).
In the film "Alien" the Navigator, Lambert, said they were just short of Zeta II Reticuli. So they were about 39 light-years away from Earth. Later in the film she states it was going to take 10 months to reach Earth. So they would have to be traveling faster than light in order to travel 39 light-years in 10 months.
In the film "Alien" the Navigator, Lambert, said they were just short of Zeta II Reticuli. So they were about 39 light-years away from Earth. Later in the film she states it was going to take 10 months to reach Earth. So they would have to be traveling faster than light in order to travel 39 light-years in 10 months.
Or traveling at about 99.977% of the speed of light, so that the time-dilated shipboard time would be 10 months while 39 years passed outside. Although the difficulty of accelerating to that velocity, not to mention the radiation and debris hazards, make it almost as unlikely as FTL.
In the film "Alien" the Navigator, Lambert, said they were just short of Zeta II Reticuli. So they were about 39 light-years away from Earth. Later in the film she states it was going to take 10 months to reach Earth. So they would have to be traveling faster than light in order to travel 39 light-years in 10 months.
^^^
That's fascinating. What is the significance of "The Outer" being 108 ly in diameter?
--Alex
"EARTH VICINITY" is 10 parsecs, or 32.6(156) ly, and the "OUTER" is 108 ly, which would be 33.113 parsecs. Why? Dunno, but it seems to be parsec based.
In the film "Alien" the Navigator, Lambert, said they were just short of Zeta II Reticuli. So they were about 39 light-years away from Earth. Later in the film she states it was going to take 10 months to reach Earth. So they would have to be traveling faster than light in order to travel 39 light-years in 10 months.
Or traveling at about 99.977% of the speed of light, so that the time-dilated shipboard time would be 10 months while 39 years passed outside. Although the difficulty of accelerating to that velocity, not to mention the radiation and debris hazards, make it almost as unlikely as FTL.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.