OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhh no.
Paradise Lost?
Paradise Lost?
So you're saying that they aren't there by accident, and were specifically paired up with a "soul-mate" who can help them over come the bad parts of themselves? That is an interesting idea.The third episode definitely showed some promise of interesting stuff to come. I originally assumed that any characters 'there by mistake' are not actually meeting their soul-mates, but that may depend upon my meaning to the term soul-mate. In this context, it could just mean an individual who happens to provide a moral balance to his/her 'mate.' For instance, Kristen Bell's character seems to have gone through life without being taught basic morality, and her soul-mate is a teacher who has been so stuck thinking about morality that he never had to put those moral theories into practice. Perhaps each of the pairs are meant to learn from each other.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhh no.
Paradise Lost?
So you're saying that they aren't there by accident, and were specifically paired up with a "soul-mate" who can help them over come the bad parts of themselves? That is an interesting idea.
Monday's 10-10:30 "The Good Place" has grown by +41% in 18-49 (from a 2.57 rating to a 3.62) in 18-49 and more than +3.2 million viewers overall (9.1 million to 12.3 million) going from "live plus same day" Nielsens to "live plus three day" figures. That made it the week's top-rated debut half-hour of a new comedy in 18-49, moving it ahead of CBS's "Kevin Can Wait" (3.30 in L+3), and "The Good Place" is now the top-rated comedy debut in L+3 on the broadcast networks since premiere week last year.
Nah, I still think it's not really the Heaven parallel, and more closely related to Purgatory; their final test to see if which destination they're truly deserving of.I think the show is going to reveal more people are in the good place by accident. It would be funny if everybody was actually there by mistake and they are all hiding it, unaware that everybody else is hiding it too.
One person being there by mistake is something that one can process. Nearly everyone we've met so far?
Especially the show features a super all-knowing Google AI that Michael could have used to learn where his mistake was? That's a bit too hard to accept.
That's what I was saying. And it's closer to three. Tahani is only playing the part, too. Whether she was doing it her whole life or only after arriving there is unknown, but it's pretty clear she's not a 'good person' deep down.Well, we now know of 2 people who are there by mistake. Bell's character is not an isolated mistake. It is not a stretch to think that there might be more.
Which itself is pretty suspicious given what he is. Hence my belief that it's all a test. I don't think he's anywhere near as oblivious as he's portraying. Notice how he keeps giving ample opportunity for Eleanor to admit the mistake?Michael comes across as a nice guy who is not very bright or competent. He could use Janet to find his mistakes but doesn't. He also seems rather oblivious to what is going on around him.
And it's closer to three. Tahani is only playing the part, too. Whether she was doing it her whole life or only after arriving there is unknown, but it's pretty clear she's not a 'good person' deep down.
In the version I watched she actually did say "I told you so!".The look Eleanor gave to Chidi when they were leaving, as if to say non-verbally "I told you they are into swinging" was hilarious.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.