Yeah, it is. Trek has been different things to different people spanning decades. This is just the latest iteration. TNG wasn't TOS. DS9 wasn't TNG. ST09 wasn't ENT.My first reaction: this is not Star Trek.
Anniversaries mean dick in Hollywood. Bond had it's 50th in 2012 and had about 3 seconds of the original riff in Skyfall. That's about it.It didn't give me any Star Trek feeling at all and that for a franchise that celebrates its 50th anniversary next year.
Probably because they cast the 1977 cast. It's built in.I'm not a big Star Wars fan, but the trailer for The Force Awakens left me wanting for more and left me with feelings of nostalgia.
That's fine. Not everything is going to be for everyone.The trailer for Star Trek Beyond left me feeling empty.
Does that why it doesn't feel like Star Trek? Earth was in danger in TMP, TVH, FC, and NEM (and yes, 09 and ID). So it's not like the numovies are the only ones who beat that into the ground.One or two good things: Karl Urban of course and it seems earth finally isn't in danger.
And there was only Excelsior in Spacedock in SFS and Enterprise was the only starship at Earth in TFF.
There are lots of tired themes in original Trek.
The themes are the same. The visuals are modern.The rest, meh. Anyone claiming this trailer feels like TOS should have their heads examined.
Movie that "feel" the way Star Trek felt aren't popular today. If you're waiting for sitting around a table and talking about evil empires needing our help then you're going to be waiting for all these action packed movies to fall out of style - and that'll be a while.And I'm all for change btw. Star Trek Beyond shouldn't be The Voyage Home or First Contact, but should feel like Star Trek and it really doesn't.