No offense taken.In his most confused way, I think think is trying to start a conversation on the evolution of consciousness. It's a subject that has fascinated Trek (ST:TMP, the TNG episode "Tin Man", Sisko as the Emissary, Kes on Voyager) so it is on topic for the board. It's just hard to discuss metaphysical subjects in a physical way.
It also helps if you don't try to write high. Not to say that I necessarily think think is high (he may be) but he is writing in that style. It makes it tough for us mere grounded mortals to relate.
But then, as I was writing this post, I got into using the structure "think think" so much I was able to use it twice. Who am I to criticize another poster for their writing style?
EDIT: On the other hand, after seeing his last post, I think think may be just spamming the board.
Make that now three times.
Yes I have been called these things and more but have grown weary of the spam meals they make us eat in the future past., where have my manners gone?
Greetings for yes High: but only as the actual effects of the airborne argots effect me less then you or more or less and once your mind expands into the new openings of real and unreal illusions that are where everything "grows" the use of the word "grass" was meant for the effect in that to stay off of... not that I was on or that Bill Clinton did not breath it in but that given a read of this thread while there would cause a possible sick feeling in ones stomach and a way to painful ache in one's head .,,
for, as well, written in the aloft state -(high)- of greater then the reader is not the intent either.., thank you for the exact interpretation of the poetics of the fire of evolution and thinking like a box of boxes being both inside and outside the box that is not and that is also of., the box
symbolically of course (no offense)
In my younger years, I greatly enjoyed the journey you are now on. Particularly, I found insight from Baba Ram Dass, Andrew Weil and various writings from Ken Kesey. Also popular but less meaningful to me were works by Carolos Casteneda and Timothy Leary. May I also recommend, highly (pun intended), LSD, ingested often, in large doses, done with friends you trust and in situations in which you absolutely feel comfortable. Also stay away from traffic, tightly enclosed spaces and mirrors. Kesey described LSD as a door leading into a room you've never seen before. With time, you will find you can open that door yourself, without the drug, although I found it a useful tool along the way. LSD is also a tremendous way to get a third person view of yourself, something that is tough in the real world.
Gurus often have described LSD as "good, but not as good as meditation." I like that description, too.
While these were the journeys of a younger me, even now, Daniel Pinchbeck's popular book 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl is on my "Must Read" list.
think, just understand trying to have this conversation with straight people is usually a waste of time.
After simply staring at think's last post, jaw agape, drinking it all in, I think I have a new favorite poster here at the TrekBBS.
AAAaaa, are you both ready for this attempt to reply at twice the normal cargo load - the doublethink in mint print as it is., =+what effect should we want for the future or of the past when the future is past .., there is nothing and no thing worth the effort in the causes of life more so then in the works of lifetime of knowing what is and is never known inside the further efforts of some vital dialog between equals at a round table or even the roundness of earth herself being bombarded by tachyons forming the auraborialis dialated motion making the moving motion of the chemicals between everythings gain a brightning in virtual light of my/our minds where beginnings were.,, ., or where what we know knows what we want and what we want we knows not now and was what when in the how of to find the frequency of living systems in our revolving doors at evolving scores of music and art so mused upon that everything means the same esle not.
