• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Fanzines of Trek -- in situ

Any spacecraft fan art from the zines?
Starlight had a few on what the replacement of the refit might be…

Lots of it, but I've only glanced. I'm going to do a deep dive chronologically, "as they come out" so I can appreciate them all holistically. Thus, only one trekzine has come out as of January 1967. There will be many more... :)

(speaking of in the time, we just watched the first superbowl. I made the mistake of rooting for the Chiefs...)
 
How were fanzines distributed anyway? In the 80s I saw some for sale in my other city science fiction bookshop (Star Trek, Dr Who, Blakes 7 I think) ? This was in Australia though

In the early 80s, every mainland capital city in Australia had its own Star Trek fan club, and each had a (monthly/bimonthly) newsletter and a regular fanzine. The club newsletters hosted ads for new zines, and canvassed contributions. "Doctor Who" was represented by several clubs. "Hitchhikers' Guide", "Blake's 7", "V", and "Star Wars" were also prolific, although for a time George Lucas was vigilant about SW fanzines attempting to be too slick. And, yes, shops such as Galaxy, Space Age, The Land Beyond Beyond and Minotaur were supportive of amateur fanzines, through shop sales and in-store community noticeboards.

The Sydney and Melbourne "Star Trek" Marathons were a monthly venue for co-mingling of creatives.
https://fanlore.org/wiki/Bob_Johnson's_Star_Trek_Marathons
 
Sorry for my ignorance here but how did fan-fiction fit in the fanzine culture? Was it a totally different fan culture?

Fan fiction in its modern sense didn't exist when Trek came out. The term was used generally to denote:

1) Fiction written by fans (as opposed to fiction written by pros)
and
2) Fiction involving fans. (indeed, a one of my favorite sf stories from last year by Tom Disch would qualify, as would an Aldiss story from the year before).

The idea of writing franchise-based fic was not widespread until Trek. And K/S didn't make its first appearance until 1974.

Fan culture, up through Trek, was male-dominated. Fan fiction culture, particularly slash culture, is female-dominated.
 
Fanzine news:

Ratatosk, the SoCal-based newszine (the counterpart to New York's Degler and the South's Rally) is back after a two-month hiatus. Because of the gap, they were rather late to the Save Star Trek party, and editor Bruce Pelz seems rather lukewarm about it (though not the show):

"STAR TREK," apparently having Rating Problems, has gained the somewhat dubious aid of a group of SF authors calling themselves "The Committee." The committee has sent out form letters (one to fans, another to SFWA members) urging recipients to write letters of appreciation and praise for "Star Trek" to TV stations, sponsors, TV columnists, and TV magazines such as TV Guide. Nine names appear on the mast head -- Anderson, Block, Del Rey, Ellison, Farmer, Herbert, Matheson, Sturgeon, and Van Vogt -- but Harlan Ellison seems to be the spearhead for The Committee. (Van Vogt gives the impression that he's letting them use his name and that's all.) [This is probably third-hand by way of Dynatron in Albequerque.] While admitting that the Vox Populai can be quite useful in saving TV shows that might go down the Neilson [sic] drain, I tend to be a bit cynical about The Committee, which obviously has its eye on the $12,000 story money [this amount probably from SFWA or third-hand from Degler], and which is using convention mailing lists for its form letters to fans (my 10-month-old daughter got a copy). If you are in a mood to write letters, by all means do so -- it is an excellent show. You can also write Ellison, at 3484 Coy Drive, Sherman Oaks, Cal 921403, if you want."

So now we know how Ellison was getting the word out -- through con mailing lists. This actually puts an upper cap on the number of people he could have directly reached. Westercon's list would have been 2-300. Worldcon's ~1000. SFWA ~100. I'd be surprised if the intersection of these three sets went much over 1000 though since the community was pretty incestuous (not literally, except, perhaps, in Walter Breen's house).

This does make me revise my thoughts somewhat on the 2nd vs. the 1st campaign. I had though Bjo's raiding of the convention lists was new to her, but obviously it wasn't. This doesn't mean the 2nd campaign still wasn't bigger (the Trek community was bigger and organized by early '68) but the con-list raiding is no longer a differentiating factor.

By the way, the latest Trek review is out at the Journey. :)
 
Last edited:
Fan fiction in its modern sense didn't exist when Trek came out. The term was used generally to denote:

1) Fiction written by fans (as opposed to fiction written by pros)
and
2) Fiction involving fans. (indeed, a one of my favorite sf stories from last year by Tom Disch would qualify, as would an Aldiss story from the year before).

The idea of writing franchise-based fic was not widespread until Trek. And K/S didn't make its first appearance until 1974.

Fan culture, up through Trek, was male-dominated. Fan fiction culture, particularly slash culture, is female-dominated.
And that's because a lot of Science Fiction fans at the time were literary science fiction fans - so if they thought their ideas and writing style were good enough, they were in fact trying to get their own stories actually published (for a fee) it the various science fiction magazines of the day; or actually approaching book agents. You didn't put your best ideas out there for fans to just read for free.
 
And that's because a lot of Science Fiction fans at the time were literary science fiction fans - so if they thought their ideas and writing style were good enough, they were in fact trying to get their own stories actually published (for a fee) it the various science fiction magazines of the day; or actually approaching book agents. You didn't put your best ideas out there for fans to just read for free.

Even literary SF fans today can be avid fanfiction (in the modern sense) writers. Back then, the genre just didn't exist.

Interestingly, a lot of pros in the 60s (and earlier) did publish original stories in fanzines for fans to read for free. I don't know if they were drawerfic or rejected or they did it just because they liked the audience.
 
Even literary SF fans today can be avid fanfiction (in the modern sense) writers. Back then, the genre just didn't exist.

"Beam Me Home" by James Tiptree, Jr, dates from (I think) 1969, and was collected (ditto) 1973.
  • I keep seeing this referenced as "Beam Us Home", but I'm fairly certain that "Beam Me Home" is correct.
  • Tiptree's/Sheldon's life was fascinating. She deserves a movie.
Nonetheless, your point is taken that it was a very rare occurrence.
 
"Beam Me Home" by James Tiptree, Jr, dates from (I think) 1969, and was collected (ditto) 1973.
  • I keep seeing this referenced as "Beam Us Home", but I'm fairly certain that "Beam Me Home" is correct.
  • Tiptree's/Sheldon's life was fascinating. She deserves a movie.
Nonetheless, your point is taken that it was a very rare occurrence.

Tiptree's is actually one of the very first fanfic (in the modern sense) and, naturally, a Trek story. :)

Trek really was a revolution. As I go along, I'll be seeing how much Trek was a gateway for women into SF fandom. It must be significant, though of course, it won't be the only gateway.
 
Belatedly discovered this thread and am enjoying the peek back into the past. I'm particularly amused by the pronouncements that "SF has no place on television" and is just "a fad." :)

Speaking of pros writing fanfic, I remember attending a reading in Seattle back in 1984 where Joanna Russ read one of her old K/S stories.
 
Belatedly discovered this thread and am enjoying the peek back into the past. I'm particularly amused by the pronouncements that "SF has no place on television" and is just "a fad." :)

Speaking of pros writing fanfic, I remember attending a reading in Seattle back in 1984 where Joanna Russ read one of her old K/S stories.

Thanks, Greg! :) It's a pleasure to meet you. My writing credits look like a short shopping list compared to yours...
 
These might be useful:
https://www.adastrasf.com/worldcon-membership-demographics-1939-1960/
https://www.adastrasf.com/report-worldcon-membership-demographics-1961-1980/

(Found them before the walnut shrimp and my molar performed their joint physics experiment on Sat. The molar lost.)

Oh, I love it! The data, I mean. That's terrible about your tooth. I hope everything will be okay.

The attendance info I knew, but not the gender ratio (looks like they made similar extrapolations on gender as Marie Vibbert did when she broke down author gender in Analog; I got to help a leetle bit with that project). 3 to 1 sounds right. Women were about 10% of the published authors but 25% of the fans as of 1966.

When I get to 1980, it'll be interesting to compare the 60/40 fandom split to the published authors split.

Thanks again. Great stuff!
 
Tiptree's is actually one of the very first fanfic (in the modern sense) and, naturally, a Trek story. :)

Trek really was a revolution. As I go along, I'll be seeing how much Trek was a gateway for women into SF fandom. It must be significant, though of course, it won't be the only gateway.

I guess I might mention, for those who are younger than us, that there were already some female science fiction fans by 1966, which I know bcause some of them were already published science fiction authors by 1966.

E. Mayne Hull (1908-1975) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edna_Mayne_Hull

C.L. Moore (1911-1987). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._L._Moore

Margaret St.Clair (1911-1995) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_St._Clair

Andre Norton (1912-2005). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Norton

Leigh Brackett (1915-1978) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leigh_Brackett

Zenna Henderson (1917-1983) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenna_Henderson

Evelyn E. Smith (1922-2000) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_E._Smith (not to be confused with the more famous E.E. Smith in science fiction, Edward Elmer "Doc" Smith 1890-1965 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._E._Smith)

Judith Merrill (1923-1997) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Merril

And those are the ones I can think of at the moment.
 
Ratatosk #47 (5/27/67 -- apparently the final issue) has a brief report from Lunacon: "Jim Blish's GoH speech was mostly about Star Trek, both the series and the book. Why he agreed to do the first book, (mainly he needed money at the time) and why he agreed to do the second in spite of getting a flat fee and no royalties (because it is, he feels, opening up a whole new audience for science fiction)."

I wonder if that speech was published anywhere. I'd love to read the whole thing.
 
I guess I might mention, for those who are younger than us, that there were already some female science fiction fans by 1966, which I know bcause some of them were already published science fiction authors by 1966.

E. Mayne Hull (1908-1975) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edna_Mayne_Hull

C.L. Moore (1911-1987). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._L._Moore

Margaret St.Clair (1911-1995) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_St._Clair

Andre Norton (1912-2005). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Norton

Leigh Brackett (1915-1978) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leigh_Brackett

Zenna Henderson (1917-1983) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenna_Henderson

Evelyn E. Smith (1922-2000) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_E._Smith (not to be confused with the more famous E.E. Smith in science fiction, Edward Elmer "Doc" Smith 1890-1965 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._E._Smith)

Judith Merrill (1923-1997) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Merril

And those are the ones I can think of at the moment.

Absolutely. I often say that women published 10% of what was written...but 25% of what was worth reading. :)

What changed after, but not necessarily because of, Star Trek was the trend toward parity in male/female representation in fandom. Although, women did have a surge of presence in fandom and in print in the early 50s. This corresponds with, but is not entirely related to, the surge in SF markets in general--the magazine "boom" which peaked in '53.

1965 and 1966 were particularly bad for female representation in SF. It only gets better from here, I think.
 
The newest Science Fiction Times has arrived, mailed out January 12, 1967. Like Ratatosk, it is coming back after a hiatus (and this one under new management). Thus, it is also late to the Save Star Trek party, but significantly more enthusiastic. The most interesting bit in this one is that editor James Ashe has already talked to Harlan, who told him the fate of Trek has already been decided, stay tuned next issue for the final word.

The most interesting part of the issue is the SFnal activities calendar, which may be a good snapshot of fanac for '67. We also get attendance numbers for Boskone '66 (68) and an approximation of LASFS' membership (Bradbury's speech filled a "meeting room").
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top