I had to watch the latest episode online instead of on the SyFy broadcast. Am I imagining it or was there an expanded title sequence this time? I don't remember the seeing the detail of Deimos breaking up around Mars before. Either way, cool!
Netflix are showing The Expanse in the UK as no TV network chose to pick it up. It makes me wonder if Netflix could partly or wholly finance the series if there is enough proven demand outside the US and Canada. Grasping at straws time again...
Besides, I think sci-fi is watching the numbers on streaming services too. ALOT of people aren't catching the broadcast live and are instead time-shifting it on Amazon or Comcast on-demand. "Broadcast night" ratings just don't mean that much anymore in an era where half your audience is working two jobs and the other half would rather watch the show in the morning when the kids are at school and there are no commercial interruptions.It depends on how much SyFy likes having their first prestige show since Battlestar Galactica. There was a lot of crap between Galactica and The Expanse which really did a number on their image.
I had to watch the latest episode online instead of on the SyFy broadcast. Am I imagining it or was there an expanded title sequence this time? I don't remember the seeing the detail of Deimos breaking up around Mars before. Either way, cool!
Wait, am I understanding this? You guys aren't getting the title sequence in the US? Very strange, we get it on every season 2 episode in Canada.The TV broadcasts only show the full title sequence in the season premiere (and finale, maybe?), but I wouldn't be surprised if the online versions got the full sequence every week.
A lot of decisions are still being made based on broadcast night ratings, despite their decreased relevance in the modern world.Besides, I think sci-fi is watching the numbers on streaming services too. ALOT of people aren't catching the broadcast live and are instead time-shifting it on Amazon or Comcast on-demand. "Broadcast night" ratings just don't mean that much anymore in an era where half your audience is working two jobs and the other half would rather watch the show in the morning when the kids are at school and there are no commercial interruptions.
I feel like that would be massively skewing viewership data to heavily favor everyone in America who is too old or too slow to figure out how to use a streaming service.A lot of decisions are still being made based on broadcast night ratings, despite their decreased relevance in the modern world.
Wait, am I understanding this? You guys aren't getting the title sequence in the US? Very strange, we get it on every season 2 episode in Canada.
It wouldn't be that big a deal to me if it did get cancelled. I prefer the structure and pacing in the novel to the TV series for season 1 at least (season 2 isn't available in the UK yet). I thought some of the story changes were unnecessary and they didn't work for me. However, I'm not a seasoned TV producer so what the hell do I know? (rhetorical question)Netflix normally only picks shows up if they can get exclusive distribution rights. If they can secure those there is a (small) chance that they could step in and save the show.
Oh, you're preaching to the choir on this matter. Unfortunately, that's now the world works at the moment.I feel like that would be massively skewing viewership data to heavily favor everyone in America who is too old or too slow to figure out how to use a streaming service.
Actually, that would explain quite a lot. No wonder network TV is inundated with cop shows, hospital dramas and dumbass sitcoms.
Oh, I know about commercials and the fact that most shows don't bother with title sequences. It just surprises me there is a title sequence made for this show that isn't included with the US broadcast. Especially since the title sequence gets updated every week to reflect changes that happen in the previous episode, for example in last week's title sequence the shot of Tycho Station no longer has the Nauvoo hovering nearby.The number of commercials per hour in the US has continued to increase, so most US shows these days don't bother with main title sequences longer than maybe 10 seconds. Although it's odd, since so many shows have opening sequences that establish the premise and backstory in a way that main title sequences used to do, but without actual credits being shown over them. Instead of a single sequence with the premise explanation, series title, and regular cast credits, we get an opening premise explanation, then a separate title card, then the cast credits shown over the first act. It's weirdly inefficient.
Oh, I know about commercials and the fact that most shows don't bother with title sequences. It just surprises me there is a title sequence made for this show that isn't included with the US broadcast. Especially since the title sequence gets updated every week to reflect changes that happen in the previous episode, for example in last week's title sequence the shot of Tycho Station no longer has the Nauvoo hovering nearby.
I feel like that would be massively skewing viewership data to heavily favor everyone in America who is too old or too slow to figure out how to use a streaming service.
Actually, that would explain quite a lot. No wonder network TV is inundated with cop shows, hospital dramas and dumbass sitcoms.
No, just their cop shows, hospital dramas and dumbass sitcoms.So, you'll be happy when we 60-or-so folks finally die and get out of your way?
I've seen it happen before -- a show without full titles in broadcast but with them on home video. Too bad we're missing the individualized titles, though.
But it's pretty much routine for end titles -- for a couple of decades now, TV shows have routinely just run the end credits at the bottom of the screen or in a box while a promo for the next show ran, so it was only in the syndicated reruns or home video that you could see the end title sequence or hear the closing theme music, even in shows that did individualized theme music for each episode.
That's one more way in which titles have "eroded" under the relentless pressure of more advertising. In the '70s and '80s, they'd just show the end title sequence with an announcer's voiceover saying what came next. Then they started running it in a box while a preview showed in another box. Then most networks just stopped showing the proper end title sequences altogether, just running the retyped credits in Chyron under a network preview.
It's just ridiculous how much commercials keep metastasizing in US television. Once, there were no more than 5-7 minutes of commercials in an hour; now they fill nearly a third of the time slot, and even get superimposed on the bottom of the screen during the show, if they're not just written into the show as blatant product placement. I wish advertisers would understand that the more they inundate us with ads, the more we tune them out as white noise. I wish they'd try a "less is more" policy for a change.
Netflix (and other streaming services) has really been an eye opener on the erosion of actual content time. It's interesting to go watch TOS and see how long the show is, then go watch a modern hour show and see how much less minutes the show is.
With 8 novels scheduled and each novel taking 1.5 seasons to show, it seems EXTREMELY unlikely (impossible actually) for us to see all the novels filmed. I'd be surprised with season 3 being green lit at this point, let alone having this show go 12-13 seasons.
Also a good point. At the pace they're going, they'll probably wrap up "Caliban's War" by the end of Season 2. I kind of disagree with those who are looking for a half-season treatment of Abbadon's Gate: that's a very complex story with multiple converging character arks and introduces people whose backgrounds and characters have to be established for the first time in the beginning of the season. I'd be amazed (and kind of disappointed) if "Gate" took less than an entire season to wrap up:The showrunners have been in the business a long time, so I assume that they're aware that more than 10 seasons is totally unrealistic. Even if the network wanted to renew that long, it's a reach to expect to be able to hang onto actors for such a lengthy run. My *guess* is that they have at least some kind of vague notion of how to do the story in something like 7 or 8 seasons, even if it means making big changes down the line to make it all fit. But this is really a question that someone needs to ask them at their next convention appearance.
Also, the first season was only 10 episodes, and it took 15 episodes to get through the first novel. But Season 2 is 13 episodes. If 13 episodes per season is going to be the norm from now on, then I don't see why it would take "1.5 seasons per novel" going forward.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.