Yeah, I was half-joking about that, I'm not that old (I just have a old soulIf you thought of Picardo as the Doctor as a young geek, then you are still many years from being an old geek...

Yeah, I was half-joking about that, I'm not that old (I just have a old soulIf you thought of Picardo as the Doctor as a young geek, then you are still many years from being an old geek...
KRAD, I just have to tell you that I'd trade an arm and a leg to read a Ninth Doctor story written by your good self. Too bad nobody's currently publishing those...Well, if I was picking a Doctor to write on general principle, it'd be either Four or Nine, simply because they're my two favorites.This is something I've been wondering for some time, and this thread has really made me curious, but a question for KRAD...since you are a connoisseur and writer of both...in an ultimate fan-boy crossover, if you could pick any of the various incarnations/regenerations, which Doctor (Who) would you team up with which Trek series and crew???
As for which flavor of Trek, that's tougher. See, the Doctor has the ability (as, I believe, Stephen Moffat his own self once put it, though I may be misattributing) to go from being in the brig/dungeon to being on the bridge/in total control of the situation in 20 minutes or less. The nature of a great deal of Who fiction (and a Trek crossover would fall into this category) is that he tends to take over from whoever's nominally in charge. That's harder to do in Trek fiction, because the captain really is in charge, and it's tough to supersede Kirk or Picard or Sisko or Janeway or Calhoun or Gold or whoever.
So I guess I'd do it with Enterprise.![]()
I don't know, I think it'd be fun to see Picard having to deal with the antics of the Fourth or Tenth Doctor, and being just as frustrated as he gets with Q. Conversely, if you preferred having the Trek captain retain his or her authority, you could go for one of the more "vulnerable" Doctors, Two or Five.
Oh, believe me, I'd give both legs to write a Nine story. (Not an arm and a leg. I need both arms to type efficiently.)KRAD, I just have to tell you that I'd trade an arm and a leg to read a Ninth Doctor story written by your good self. Too bad nobody's currently publishing those...![]()
Well, if I was picking a Doctor to write on general principle, it'd be either Four or Nine, simply because they're my two favorites.This is something I've been wondering for some time, and this thread has really made me curious, but a question for KRAD...since you are a connoisseur and writer of both...in an ultimate fan-boy crossover, if you could pick any of the various incarnations/regenerations, which Doctor (Who) would you team up with which Trek series and crew???
As for which flavor of Trek, that's tougher. See, the Doctor has the ability (as, I believe, Stephen Moffat his own self once put it, though I may be misattributing) to go from being in the brig/dungeon to being on the bridge/in total control of the situation in 20 minutes or less. The nature of a great deal of Who fiction (and a Trek crossover would fall into this category) is that he tends to take over from whoever's nominally in charge. That's harder to do in Trek fiction, because the captain really is in charge, and it's tough to supersede Kirk or Picard or Sisko or Janeway or Calhoun or Gold or whoever.
So I guess I'd do it with Enterprise.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.