• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

the Defenseless Earth

The thing is, usually we simply aren't in a position to see the defensive arrangements - that is, we cannot see that they wouldn't be there.

In the two TOS movies where Earth is attacked, the invader is a supercreature that simply shuts down the defenses. Verbal mention is made of their existence, though, so we can't really claim Earth would have been undefended. In "BoBW", the invader is again a supercreature, but this time we get to see some of the carnage. But while we see the dead starships, we never get a chance to see or not see the fixed fortifications. They probably are there, and they probably valiantly fought the Borg, but the episode didnt' show this because the VFX would have been too expensive and the drama could be written to exclude this.

In DS9, Earth is again attacked, and defenses react, and the enemy is defeated, but once again we don't see the action. That's cheap and effective, dramatically speaking.

The only time we actually see that Earth is undefended against a predictable attack is this ENT thing. We don't see it in "Twilight", as the camera doesn't dwell on the events long enough. We only see it at the end of the third season - and while it appears to fit a pattern, it's actually a unique event.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Even in TMP(set a whole 120 years after much of ENT)the planet is almost totally defenseless against V'Ger and only---conveniently---the newly refitted Enterprise is able to go out and save the day.:p You'd think by the 2270s that Starfleet would have enough starships, cruisers, et. al. in Earth orbit and around nearby planets and asteroids to provide an adequate defense ring about the planet.
They didn't arrive until the Tuesday after.

You mean with the photon torpedoes, medical team, tractor beam, and all that? :p
 
Even in TMP(set a whole 120 years after much of ENT)the planet is almost totally defenseless against V'Ger and only---conveniently---the newly refitted Enterprise is able to go out and save the day.:p You'd think by the 2270s that Starfleet would have enough starships, cruisers, et. al. in Earth orbit and around nearby planets and asteroids to provide an adequate defense ring about the planet.
They didn't arrive until the Tuesday after.

You mean with the photon torpedoes, medical team, tractor beam, and all that? :p

Damn Harriman family.

Generations of screwing up Starfleet delivery service.
 
This isn't a problem of just Enterprise. After all, in every series and movie Earth seems weirdly undefended for being the capital of the Federation. Bajor at times seems better defended than Earth.
 
Starfleet must have a LOTTA down time and shore leave for her officers, crew and ships to save credits and maintainance.:lol:
 
CINC STARFLEET: So I sent every ship in the quadrant on missions away from Earth. Whats the worst that could happen?
 
Indeed, I was just watching Generations again the other day, and its infuriatingly dumb when Enterprise-B is cruising through the Sol System, and yet are "the only ship in range"

What, there isn't a single ship around Earth, in Spacedock, Lunar, around Mars, at Utopia Planetia, anywhere???
 
On the bright side and in Starfleet's defense, when they DO scramble starships and defense craft to counter invaders of the Sol system(STAR TREK IV, "The Best of Both Worlds(TNG)")they are often bitchsmacked and wiped out with ease.:p So maybe its a double-edged bat'leth.
 
On the bright side and in Starfleet's defense, when they DO scramble starships and defense craft to counter invaders of the Sol system(STAR TREK IV, "The Best of Both Worlds(TNG)")they are often bitchsmacked and wiped out with ease.:p So maybe its a double-edged bat'leth.
Ah the Estaban family. They are everywhere.
 
and who came up with the bloody stupid name Utopia Planetia anyway?
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, presumably.
The name 'Utopia' appears on Percival Lowell's map of Martian features. I don't notice it on Giovanni Schiaparelli's maps, but I don't assert that Schiaparelli or William Rutter Dawes didn't put the name there.

The 'Planitia' means, simply, 'plain'. Most of the Martian features picked up vaguely Latin names as these were more stylish in the 19th century when the major features got their names.
 
The name 'Utopia' appears on Percival Lowell's map of Martian features. I don't notice it on Giovanni Schiaparelli's maps, but I don't assert that Schiaparelli or William Rutter Dawes didn't put the name there.

The Lunar and Planetary Institute website credits the naming of "Utopia Planitia" to Schiaparelli circa 1882.

TGT
 
and who came up with the bloody stupid name Utopia Planetia anyway?

According to TGT's link it was Thomas More, which I had forgotten. I think it's fairly safe to bet that if anyone does settle on Mars, they will come up with their own names for settlements.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top