It appears the movie is going to be 2 hours 45 minutes long.
Thus making it the longest film in the trilogy by a good 10 to 15 minutes, which is cool with me. It needs to be long so that no element of the story gets shortchanged.
It appears the movie is going to be 2 hours 45 minutes long.
There's more TV spots.
Looks like Morgan Freeman has nailed this role again!
It's like even bale brought up his acting game for this film.. and they all are so much better than Hathaway.. who, if anyone, will sink the film.
Edward???? Does anyone really call him "Edward". Why not just say call him Riddler? The whole E. Nigma thing sound phony anyway. Almost as bad as Jack Napier or Joe Kerr.I don't think Leo would have been a bad choice...Nolan was able to get an amazing performance out of him in "Inception", I just don't really see him as Edward. He very well could have been epic in the role had it happened. What I find most interesting about the comments is that WB wanted the Riddler as the villain. Nolan and WB/DC Ent must have had some very fascinating back and forth discussions when it came time to talk about what villains Nolan and Goyer wanted to use.
Edward???? Does anyone really call him "Edward". Why not just say call him Riddler?I don't think Leo would have been a bad choice...Nolan was able to get an amazing performance out of him in "Inception", I just don't really see him as Edward. He very well could have been epic in the role had it happened. What I find most interesting about the comments is that WB wanted the Riddler as the villain. Nolan and WB/DC Ent must have had some very fascinating back and forth discussions when it came time to talk about what villains Nolan and Goyer wanted to use.
It appears the movie is going to be 2 hours 45 minutes long.
Thus making it the longest film in the trilogy by a good 10 to 15 minutes, which is cool with me. It needs to be long so that no element of the story gets shortchanged.
Edward???? Does anyone really call him "Edward". Why not just say call him Riddler?I don't think Leo would have been a bad choice...Nolan was able to get an amazing performance out of him in "Inception", I just don't really see him as Edward. He very well could have been epic in the role had it happened. What I find most interesting about the comments is that WB wanted the Riddler as the villain. Nolan and WB/DC Ent must have had some very fascinating back and forth discussions when it came time to talk about what villains Nolan and Goyer wanted to use.
Admiral_Young has a thing about referring to people by their first names.
It appears the movie is going to be 2 hours 45 minutes long.
Thus making it the longest film in the trilogy by a good 10 to 15 minutes, which is cool with me. It needs to be long so that no element of the story gets shortchanged.
It should be however as long as the story dictates; saying that a movie should be a certain length prior to its release strikes me as madness. Let the film speak for itself.
The Dark Knight crawled a little too far up its own ass at certain points for my taste, and a nearly three-hour run time for The Dark Knight Rises gives me some -- just a little, mind you -- trepidation. In any event, I'll just wait and see ... which I suppose is all we can do.
Seems silly when applied to fictional character. They should be called by the name that made them "famous". Edward is a sparkly, sensitive vampire, not a guy who like puzzles ( and crime)Edward???? Does anyone really call him "Edward". Why not just say call him Riddler?I don't think Leo would have been a bad choice...Nolan was able to get an amazing performance out of him in "Inception", I just don't really see him as Edward. He very well could have been epic in the role had it happened. What I find most interesting about the comments is that WB wanted the Riddler as the villain. Nolan and WB/DC Ent must have had some very fascinating back and forth discussions when it came time to talk about what villains Nolan and Goyer wanted to use.
Admiral_Young has a thing about referring to people by their first names.
Edward is a sparkly, sensitive vampire, not a guy who like puzzles ( and crime)
They probably would have been happy with Penguin too, or anbody very familiar to the public. A fly on the wall in that meeting could probably supply you with quotes like, "Bane? Who the fuck is Bane? How are we supposed to market him?"What I find most interesting about the comments is that WB wanted the Riddler as the villain. Nolan and WB/DC Ent must have had some very fascinating back and forth discussions when it came time to talk about what villains Nolan and Goyer wanted to use.
Like Victor Fries, its a little too on the nose for my tastes.Tossing my card in for Harley Quinn.
Except that's not her real name, it's Harleen Quinzel. Sorry to be nitpicky, but she's one of my favorite Batman characters.Tossing my card in for Harley Quinn.
Except that's not her real name, it's Harleen Quinzel. Sorry to be nitpicky, but she's one of my favorite Batman characters.Tossing my card in for Harley Quinn.
Except that's not her real name, it's Harleen Quinzel. Sorry to be nitpicky, but she's one of my favorite Batman characters.Tossing my card in for Harley Quinn.
True, but "Harley Quinn" is a logical "nick-name" for Harleen Quinzel.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.