• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Dark Knight Rises Anticipation Station

Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

My personal pic for Taila would be Emily Blunt but since she was already heavily rumored earlier in the year for Selena I doubt she'll be considered. She's also passed on previous comic book role offers so it's possible she's not interested in doing a comic book movie.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

My personal pic for Taila would be Emily Blunt but since she was already heavily rumored earlier in the year for Selena I doubt she'll be considered. She's also passed on previous comic book role offers so it's possible she's not interested in doing a comic book movie.

I honestly have trouble imagining an actor who would turn down a role from Chris Nolan in his sequel to The Dark Knight. Not after the money and buzz and awards and all that it won.

Short of Bob Redford or some such.

Certainly no young non-40 year veteran actor would be dumb enough, not post-TDK. Pre TDK? OK, sure. Post? You'd have to be brain-dead.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

Nolan is probably too polite to say that Riddler is an exceedingly lame and unthreatening villain.

Not if Nolan did him.

Play him in the same vein as Joker, only less chaotic and more conspiratorial and smarter. He's less about violence and shock and more about secrets and lies and knowledge = power. He's the only man in the world who sees that something is wrong with the story of Batman killing people and Harvey Dent as a martyr. He sees puzzles and riddles and encryption on a genius scale, and two and two equal five for this story.

Make him about knowing the truth to blackmail the Bat, or exposing it out of a twisted sense of justice; but born of his megalomania and arrogance that he's smarter than the world and Batman.

It's a moot point. But it could be done properly. He could re-invent the guy from a silly trickster with a green suit and question marks and word puzzles, to a real super-intellect conspiracy nut.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

I don't think she'd refuse a role in a Nolan movie either. Just saying though that she has turned down previous big roles.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

I agree that Shadow of the Bat would be a much better name, though.

Well, in B:TAS that was the name of the story that introduced Batgirl, so it seems weird to me if applied to a solo Batman story with no sidekick involved.

Yes, but it was also the title of a comic series that ran from 1992 to 2000.

I think the film needs something more than Batman vs. villain. Riddler is too similar in the public consciousness to the Joker...
I can testify from personal experience that this is true. I dressed up as the Riddler last Halloween (photo link), and a good 30% of the people who called out to me when I was marching in the NYC Village Halloween parade called me the Joker.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

I can testify from personal experience that this is true. I dressed up as the Riddler last Halloween (photo link), and a good 30% of the people who called out to me when I was marching in the NYC Village Halloween parade called me the Joker.

Wow, what a bunch of idiots.:o
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

I can testify from personal experience that this is true. I dressed up as the Riddler last Halloween (photo link), and a good 30% of the people who called out to me when I was marching in the NYC Village Halloween parade called me the Joker.

Wow, what a bunch of idiots.:o

Well, it WAS fun to berate them when they got it wrong... :devil:
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

Either way, that's a pretty awesome Riddler costume. Well done.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

Bleh, I'll join the chorus of those not caring for the title. Bland and cheesy, IMO. Yeah, it gets the theme of the movie across and it works, but if feels cheap, or at least pedestrian. "Rise of the Dark Knight" would work better, IMO. If you absolutely have to have The Dark Knight in there (and you're not willing to use The Dark Knight Returns, which is the best name for the theme I assume Nolan's going for), how about The Dark Knight Triumphant? (The) Dark Knight Victorious? If he's not going to be publicly accepted till the end, how about Knightfall?

But these are quibbles; "Batman Begins" is no great shakes either, and it's certainly not "Attack of the Clones."

The Riddler would've been fun, but it'll be interesting to see who else Nolan brings in. What are the chances do you think this one will have a female character that is both significant to the plot and survives? Or maybe even more than one significant, just for kicks? ;)
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

Either way, that's a pretty awesome Riddler costume. Well done.

Thanks! It won me an iPod Shuffle for Best Costume at that party, and that was before I added more question marks to the jacket and finally got my purple Frank Gorshin-style mask in the mail (It was shipping from Argentina, so it took longer than anticipated). So now I want to wear it again... :lol:
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

Ah, and I didn't mention my thought on villain. If this is Nolan's final movie, I think he'll bring in Talia in order to take things full circle. Hugo Strange also seems like a safe bet given the Gotham PD trying to hunt down Batman.

The film really needs a headliner, flashy villain though; even Begins had Scarecrow after all. I halfway expect Nolan to try and combine Talia and Catwoman similar to the way he combined Ducard and Ra's al Ghul.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

^ This is along the lines of my own thinking. Talia will introduce herself to Bruce and then at some point during the movie will reveal her true identify to which their conflicting relationship will kick in.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

Bit of a meh title. It's kind of a reworking of the old Batman Triumphant title (which I think is actually superior - although it has more of a pulpy vibe than would be suitable for Nolan's films).

I'm glad they're not using the Riddler. I'm hoping for villains we haven't seen on screen before. Talia, Deadshot, Killer Croc, and Hugo Strange would all fit nicely into Nolan's Batverse.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

I think that going on previous traits that there will be a trio of antagonists in "The Dark Knight Rises" just as there have been in the previous two films. I think there will be a main villain...possibly Talia manipulating and controlling events until she reveals herself to Bruce, such as her father did. Then a secondary villain (like Scaregrow in the first film) possibly Black Mask or Hugo Strange that is the actual physical challenge for Batman. Perhaps it could be someone entirely new sent by Talia to test "The Detective" (of course I'm still even speculating that Talia will be in the film, she's just an example) then a third Two-Face character that tests Bruce's psychological make up. Hugo Strange seems like a good candidate for that type of character. I could see Bruce possibly seeing a psychiatrist or ordered by Lucius Fox to see one and Hugo becomes fascinated with Bruce to the degree of obession. Perhaps Hugo even uncovers the documents that one blackmailer from "The Dark Knight" possessed who threatened to expose Bruce if he wasn't paid off. The possibilities are endless, but knowing Nolan probably nothing of the sort lol.
 
Re: Third Nolan Batman film title announced!

The problem isn't that The Caped Crusader would make people think of Adam West -- the problem is that it wouldn't make people think of Christian Bale. Remember, films have to be targeted at a mass audience, not just the people who are already familiar with the concept. The Dark Knight was one of the most successful superhero movies ever made -- of course they're going to include The Dark Knight in the title to its sequel.

The Caped Crusader makes me think Batman...period. :shrug:

Yes, but you're a Batman fan. As I said, movie studios cannot base their marketing solely on the existing fanbase. Not only does a movie need to draw in a larger, mass audience to succeed, but the existing fanbase will come anyway, so they don't need to be marketed to. Hence, the title needs to be something that will draw in the people out there who aren't already Batman fans. People who may have never seen a Batman story before BB or even before TDK. People who came to the movie not because it was a Batman story but because they wanted to see Christian Bale or Heath Ledger or Morgan Freeman or Gary Oldman or whoever, or who were there with a date, or who wanted to see what all the hype was about, or whatever. People like that constitute the bulk of a successful motion picture's audience.

So the people in charge of marketing this film have to market it the way they'd market any other sequel to a hugely successful film, and that means they'll give it a title that reflects the title of that film, so that moviegoers in general, even those who don't know a blessed thing about Batman's history or lore, will look at the title and realize, "Hey, this is a sequel to that movie Heath Ledger made before he died!" or "Hey, this is another Christopher Nolan/Christian Bale movie!" Or even, "Hmm, I didn't see that Dark Knight picture, but I heard it was really impressive, and this must be a sequel to it, so maybe I'll try it out."

It's the same reason the third Rambo movie was called Rambo III instead of First Blood Part III -- because Rambo: First Blood Part II was a far more successful movie than First Blood. It was a more familiar, recognizable name to mass audiences. Marketing is about drawing in the people who aren't already familiar with the property. And those people wouldn't recognize that The Caped Crusader refers to Batman.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top