Truthfully Batman and Superman were never my favorite DC characters. Or Wonder Woman. I liked the other ones better.
WHAT other ones?

Truthfully Batman and Superman were never my favorite DC characters. Or Wonder Woman. I liked the other ones better.
That wasn't Tom Berenger, rather it was Eric Roberts.And a LOT of the mob stuff could have been cut without losing much (except Tom Berenger.) The mob stuff was okay in Begins, but it just didn't do much here.
That wasn't Tom Berenger, rather it was Eric Roberts.And a LOT of the mob stuff could have been cut without losing much (except Tom Berenger.) The mob stuff was okay in Begins, but it just didn't do much here.
That wasn't Tom Berenger, rather it was Eric Roberts.And a LOT of the mob stuff could have been cut without losing much (except Tom Berenger.) The mob stuff was okay in Begins, but it just didn't do much here.
CRAP! I always get those two mixed up. Sorry.![]()
You complain about a subplot that adds nothing to the movie, and then turn around and say you want the movie to waste time on Gordon chasing petty crooks, which in turn would ... add nothing of substantive value to the movie.
I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
I wanted more character development out of the characters. It was nearly devoid of any in the movie.
There was plenty of that.
I thought Gordon had plenty of development, at least plenty in terms of what was needed in the film.
It wasn't rapid. He didn't get promoted til at least midway through the film, and even before that he was on the ground doing everything he could to catch the Joker -- which he eventually ended up aiding in doing.
So despite the objective quality of the film, your subjective opinion has already marred it. Gotcha.Truthfully Batman and Superman were never my favorite DC characters. Or Wonder Woman. I liked the other ones better.
Relevance?There were a few Batman comics I did enjoy (Long Halloween being one of them). I enjoyed the TAS and Beyond immensely and Justice League but those are another medium.
WHAT other ones?Truthfully Batman and Superman were never my favorite DC characters. Or Wonder Woman. I liked the other ones better.Green Arrow?
I loved the movie, though some of the dialogue was a bit too pointed.
I think the best thing about the film is that filmmakers are going to realize that the story is what epople see not anything flashy. The action in the film was very authentic, without any standout CGI or anything like that. It was 't a lot of action and it didn't take away from the story, instead it added to the investment people had into the characters. Hopefully this will start a trend away from the overuse of CGI... it should only be a tool, not the reason to see a film
I don't. I love The Killing Joke, I really do, but I prefer the idea that nobody knows who the Joker used to be, or where he came from. It doesn't matter how he became the Joker, or why. The Joker simply is.There wasn't a lot of character development. Dent? Joker even had not enough character development. In fact one of my favorite things about the Joker was his origin story. I really wish they had tied that into Batman.
They didn't have to. Honestly, I was expecting Gordon to be a Captain (or whatever comes after Lieutenant in police ranks) in this one, and become Commissioner either at the end or in the third movie. But his promotion here didn't feel tacked on; with Commissioner Loeb gone, Gordon was the best, cleanest, and most qualified officer the GCPD had left.Gordon didn't have a lot of development. So catching Joker promoted him to commish? Hmm. I wish there was more to that, then here ya go, here's the commish part. That felt rushed and latched on, that they had to do it.
Same here. The voice, and to some degree the whole Batman look when we get too good a look at him, just takes me right out of the movie. Visually and aurally, he's just a little too...unsubtle for the otherwise-realistic world around him.My only problem, still, is that I don't like Bale's Batman voice and I don't think it is entirely his fault it sounds like it's being heavly tweaked in post.
It's just too much, too strong, and too intense. It's something that really, really, REALLY needs to be fixed. I will agree, though, that Bale is a very good Batman/Bruce otherwise.
Lord of the Rings.Look at Indiana Jones
1980s.
Superman
1970s.
James Bond
1960s.
but a great, grand, theme is needed for Batman.
Why?
Much like cinematography, directing, acting and just about everything else associated with filmmaking, scoring has evolved with the times. Operatic scores such as John Williams' Star Wars and Indiana Jones, Jerry Goldsmith's Star Trek: The Motion Picture and even Danny Elfman's own Batman (which is quality music but an absolutely terrible score), are elements of a filmmaking age that has passed by.
And...that's a good thing...?Whereas those two notes in Zimmer and Howard's theme evoke Batman perched on top of a building, looking down at Gotham City by night, contemplating his next move, or perhaps just brooding about how tortured and emo he is.
I just saw it on a second-weekend Sunday afternoon, and the theater was I'd say 70-80% full...enough to make me sit in the fifth row not to have to stumble over people to find a center seat.I loved the movie...but walked out feeling just thoroughly depressed! Was surprised that the theater was only about 20% full for a Friday 11 AM screening...and this is a theater in suburban NY that I've seen PACKED.
I have to say, the pacing was excellent. I never looked at my watch (cell phone, actually, I stopped wearing a watch...and yes, the ringer was off), and the movie surprised me more than once when I thought things were due to wind down and out popped the next phase of the Joker's scheme.but for a movie over two and half hours long, the pacing was good enough to keep you from looking at your watch.
Not necessarily. A girl can't have the same name as her daughter?Actually, his wife's name is Barbara. Meaning his daughter's name isn't.
And...that's a good thing...?
I think that was meant to add a bit of pathos--Dent wouldn't have killed the kid, but Batman couldn't have known that.Also, the fact that the coin landed on the "live" side when he fell down hinted that Two-Face may have survived.
"Always"? Haven't read much '50s/'60s Batman, have we...?Batman was always the darkest, most somber, on the edge character.
Because you can't simply separate the mediums, which portray the characters.
And...that's a good thing...?
Actually...yes.
When I saw TDK for the second time on Saturday, I was paying more attention to the music, and I was struck by the soundtrack's effective use of this two-note motif. It generally played right when the action was about to ramp up, or when the Batman was about to do something particularly spectacular or dangerous--when he was about to drop onto the Scarecrow's car, for example. I found it quite effective.
I also realized that the Joker's "theme" consisted of just one prolonged, discordant note, which I also found quite effective. It generally played as the Joker began to put one of his evil schemes into motion, as a way of putting you on edge and building suspense.
The same can be said about a lot of movies. Don't gang up Indy alone, okay?Wow.
TDK made more money in 10 days than Indie made in 9 weeks.
LOL!
Wow.
TDK made more money in 10 days than Indie made in 9 weeks.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.