Political correctness? Seriously, you're gonna go there?
It's a reflex.

Political correctness? Seriously, you're gonna go there?
There were plenty of non-forehead aliens shown in the trek films; check out the memory alpha page of federation members for some choice examples from TMP and TVH.
I'd say speculation, rather than a clear statement,There's a very good reason to conclude that there wouldn't be a Horta anywhere on the 1701-D.
It's clearly stated in "Devil in the Dark" that the Horta can exist in "our atmosphere" for only a short period of time. This is a logical statement, based upon the best ideas about how silicon-based life might work... an atmosphere high in oxygen would be poisonous to silicon-based life.
http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/26.htmMCCOY: Silicon-based life is physiologically impossible, especially in an oxygen atmosphere.
SPOCK: It may be, Doctor, that the creature can exist for brief periods in such an atmosphere before returning to its own environment.
Care to comment on any OTHER aspect of the post?Political correctness? Seriously, you're gonna go there?
Care to comment on any OTHER aspect of the post?Political correctness? Seriously, you're gonna go there?
I thought that this was the question posed in the thread:Care to comment on any OTHER aspect of the post?Political correctness? Seriously, you're gonna go there?
Why? It didn't address the question I posed in the thread, so I chose not to reply.
And that's exactly what my post was addressing. That there IS good reason to say that there isn't a Horta below decks somewhere on the Enterprise-D.This brings up, then, who exactly are the people who believe that most Trek aliens should follow in the traditions of TNG and the subsequent shows, and be humanoid with bumps on their heads? I've personally always followed what Orci states here — e.g., there's nothing to say that there isn't a Horta below decks somewhere on the Enterprise-D — and don't know if Anthony was overstating this in his question or not. Are there really people who believe this?
I thought Tholians always looked cool. The ENT version, not the TOS one.
I thought that this was the question posed in the thread:Care to comment on any OTHER aspect of the post?
Why? It didn't address the question I posed in the thread, so I chose not to reply.And that's exactly what my post was addressing. That there IS good reason to say that there isn't a Horta below decks somewhere on the Enterprise-D.This brings up, then, who exactly are the people who believe that most Trek aliens should follow in the traditions of TNG and the subsequent shows, and be humanoid with bumps on their heads? I've personally always followed what Orci states here — e.g., there's nothing to say that there isn't a Horta below decks somewhere on the Enterprise-D — and don't know if Anthony was overstating this in his question or not. Are there really people who believe this?
I thought Tholians always looked cool. The ENT version, not the TOS one.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.