ROTJ has the Luke/Vader/Emperor content so it's gained in appreciation over the years. But at the time of release the Ewoks didn't go over particularly well.
What? He's hardly one dimensional.I was a bit horrified how increasingly one-dimensional Disney has transformed the character.
It's considered quite childish, with all the puppets in Jabba's palace and then the Ewoks. It was the subject of many jokes for a while.ROTJ has the Luke/Vader/Emperor content so it's gained in appreciation over the years. But at the time of release the Ewoks didn't go over particularly well.
Nope. Feels the same as he always had.What? He's hardly one dimensional
What video is this and what does it say about his backstory?I had stumbled across a video that revealed Anakin's backstory between "The Phantom Menace" and "Attack of the Clones", created by Disney Lucasfilm.
Less controversial now. Liking the Sequels is more controversial now. You speak against the PT you invite ire.This is probably even more controversial than Alien Exodus, but what the hell...
I liked the prequel trilogy.
There. How's THAT foring controversy, eh? The SW prequels get a bad rap, and people sure love to shit all over them. But I enjoyed them.
Hell, before Rogue One came along, the prequel trilogy were my favorite SW films!
Rant over.
I like the sequels.Less controversial now. Liking the Sequels is more controversial now. You speak against the PT you invite ire.
I personally prefer the books of the PT films, to the films themselves.
The duel between Dooku vs. Obi-Wan/Anakin is one of my favorite parts of that book. It also has an excellent description of why the Jedi Order failed, and the nature of the Dark Side and in contrast to the Jedi's view of the Force. Really enjoyable and made the film a little better.Legit the lightsaber duel in Revenge of the Sith with Dooku in the novel is way more interesting than the film. But that's because it is told from Dooku's point of view and is allowed to point out dueling style changes when Obi-wan and Anakin step up their game and became an actual threat to Dooku.
Yes, in a way. He basically doesn't know how to be a friend, but puts people into categories: allies and enemies.All I remember from that part of the book is the bit where it seems to be saying that Dooku has somehow been a lifelong psychopath.
He only directed four: ANH, TPM, AOTC, ROTS.
I personally prefer the books of the PT films, to the films themselves.
Different strokes and all that. Attack of the Clones was not as enjoyable as The Phantom Menace or Revenge of the Sith. As for ham fisted and over the top, well the film was equally so. It's easier for me to take in prose than in film. I cringe at the film. I can stomach the book.I don't. Mind you, I read the book version of "The Phantom Menace" and had no problems with the novelization for "Attack of the Clones". I thought the latter was okay, but I didn't feel the same about it as I do for the movie. But I don't like the novelization for "Revenge of the Sith". I didn't care for Matthew Stover's style of writing. I found it ham-fisted and over-the-top.
Different strokes and all that. Attack of the Clones was not as enjoyable as The Phantom Menace or Revenge of the Sith. As for ham fisted and over the top, well the film was equally so. It's easier for me to take in prose than in film. I cringe at the film. I can stomach the book.
Mileage will vary.
I only talked about the novel for Attack of the Clones. The film is my favorite PT film. Easily rewatchable, very fun, and enjoyable. Easily my favorite over the other two."Attack of the Clones" may not have been favorable for you, but it's my favorite PT movie. And it's one of my two favorite SW movies overall. Then again, that's just me. And I still loathe Matthew Stover's writing style for ROTS.
And Obi-Wan playing detective.AotC... the one with Padme in a bodice telling Ani to go away?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.