^^^ Exactly.
Actually, yes it was, twice (no specific "quadrant" text, but even worse, a generic we're the only ship...period).
The first, with Scotty grousing about sending out an untested ship, Kirk responds:
"Mr. Scott, there's an alien object with unbelievable destructive power less than three days away from this planet. The only Starship in interception range is the Enterprise! Ready, or not, she launches in twelve hours!"
Also, during the main briefing in the dimensionally transcendental rec-dec:
"That's all we know about it; except that it's now 2.2 days from Earth. Enterprise is the only Federation starship that stands in its way."
No mention of the more advanced nature of the Enterprise as a reason to send her out early. No mention of the seniority of a tested crew. Nothing. Just the only ship. From Earth to Qo'Nos. Pffft!

I don't quite get this statement. Is this to imply that Trek literature makes more sense than what is shown on screen? Should we settle for less on screen than in a book? Please explain.
No, while all the movies possess their share of problems, none of the previous movie contain the shear volume of plot holes and inconsistency as Star Trek Eleven.all of the movies suffered from similar issues
TMP - Enterprise is the only ship in the quadrant. Really?
Not really, this was never stated.
Actually, yes it was, twice (no specific "quadrant" text, but even worse, a generic we're the only ship...period).
The first, with Scotty grousing about sending out an untested ship, Kirk responds:
"Mr. Scott, there's an alien object with unbelievable destructive power less than three days away from this planet. The only Starship in interception range is the Enterprise! Ready, or not, she launches in twelve hours!"
Also, during the main briefing in the dimensionally transcendental rec-dec:
"That's all we know about it; except that it's now 2.2 days from Earth. Enterprise is the only Federation starship that stands in its way."
No mention of the more advanced nature of the Enterprise as a reason to send her out early. No mention of the seniority of a tested crew. Nothing. Just the only ship. From Earth to Qo'Nos. Pffft!

This already explained by previous poster.TWOK - They used that one [only ship in the quadrant] for this too
How so?
I'll concede this one. Those pesky Tal Shiar...When exactly did the Romulans get Picard's DNA to make Shinzon?
Likely when Picard was a younger man, how did the Romulans actual get and transport his "genetic matter," in the words of Robert Heinlein, the Romulans probably wrapped a woman around it.

The "I never forget a face" bit and the fact that none of Khan's original followers seem to have been represented by many appropriately-aged actors. they were all extremely young, coupled with the mentioning of a character by the same name as in "Space Seed". ALL the statements about different spellings, or the younger Joachim being Khan's son named after his Lieutenant are all non-canonical speculation.TWOK - They used that one for this too, but there's also the Chekov thing, Khan's insignia badge, Joachim, Khan's quickly-obtained knowledge of late 23rd century starship systems, etc.
What "Chekov thing?" And what exactly is wrong with Joachim?
Because this isn't Trek Literature.Another single Borg cube going into the Federation on its own? Why not a fleet or a bunch of tactical cubes and finish them off once and for all?
I don't quite get this statement. Is this to imply that Trek literature makes more sense than what is shown on screen? Should we settle for less on screen than in a book? Please explain.
Last edited: