• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Case of the Colonist's Corpse by Bob Ingersoll & Tony Isabella

Damian

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
I read this book while on vacation. It's a different style of Star Trek novel that I never heard much about. I saw it at a used bookstore and decided to pick it up a few years back. It's a Perry Mason type story (right down to the red tinted pages) that features Kirk's defense attorney in 'Court Martial' and Areel Shaw from the same episode is the prosecutor. The Klingons and Federation are trying to develop a planet, Anehar II, to prove to the Organians they are better able to develop it. In the story, the Federation's administrator, Daniel Latham, is found murdered and the Klingon Commander, Mak'tor, is standing over his body. Cogley, always up for a challenge, decides to defend Mak'tor.

I thought the story was an above average story, certainly a different style, which can be a good thing. I didn't really watch much of the Perry Mason show, but I did enjoy the Mason telemovies that were out in the 80's and early 90's. This novel follows a similar pattern, more or less. The events leading up to the crime, the crime, the investigation and the trial. The book starts off with the conclusion of an unrelated trial involving Cogley. There is a bit of a loose thread, where the man just found innocent in that story seems interested in LaSalle, Cogley's assistant, but it's dropped with no further development. Then the story moves to Anehar II and we meet Latham, the character that will be found murdered, along with all the potential 'suspects'. Things are not going well on Anehar II, and the weather is brutal on top of it, with oppressive heat by day. His wife, his assistant, his chief miner, his computer programmer, among others are potential suspects, along with Mak'tor and his assistant, Khogo.

Kirk and co. do make a cameo appearance. At first I thought, here we go, Kirk and the Enterprise are going to save the day for Cogley in some fashion. But no, it truly is a cameo appearance. There is a bit of unnecessary exposition for Kirk though, with him dwelling on his lack of real friends, and him thinking about Gary Mitchell and Finney. I can understand some of it for readers not familiar with the ins and outs of Star Trek, but I thought it was leading somewhere. But no. It's just there for no other apparent reason.

It also seems to take a long time to set up the 'crime'. But at the same time there doesn't seem to be a good area to trim down. It all seems important. It's just you're already almost halfway through the book before Cogley reappears. And at the end the resolution feels a bit hurried. At one point things are not going well for Cogley, then all of a sudden we have a resolution where it all comes together. It almost seemed like the authors were thinking, uh-oh, we're running out of pages, we have to wrap this up. It's all made clear at the end, but a chapter in between where Cogley starts putting the pieces together would have been a bit less jarring. It was like, gee Cogley's in real trouble now, no wait, just kidding. It's that sudden.

My final critique is at the end, the Enterprise returns to take some of the parties home and Kirk speaks to Areel Shaw for a moment and he notices something is wrong with Shaw. She wanted to beat Cogley because she was basically being harangued by her co-workers about losing to him. But there's no resolution. Perhaps it was to be taken up with a future similar book that never happened. But it's left hanging.

But I thought overall it was a good story. It flowed well and kept my interest throughout. Of course you knew Mak'tor was innocent, that's the whole point of the story. It's all about who really did it, the events surrounding the crime and Cogley's genius at work. I wish further stories had been written in this style involving Cogley, but I guess it was just a one off deal. A pity. I would have liked more
 
I liked this book it's a very good story.I read it last year. The Perry Mason type story telling is what makes this TOS story unique.I like how the mystery about the crime is solved was really clever.
 
I also thought it was very unique, in a good way :)

I'd have loved another "Cogley Mystery".
 
My final critique is at the end, the Enterprise returns to take some of the parties home and Kirk speaks to Areel Shaw for a moment and he notices something is wrong with Shaw. She wanted to beat Cogley because she was basically being harangued by her co-workers about losing to him. But there's no resolution. Perhaps it was to be taken up with a future similar book that never happened. But it's left hanging.

Well, as the prosecutor, Shaw was filling the role of Perry Mason's archrival Hamilton Burger -- whose name was "Ham Burger" for a reason, because he always lost, at least to Perry. (Presumably, once Perry exposed the real murderers, Burger succeeded in prosecuting them off-camera.) There was a long-standing rivalry between them, albeit a respectful, professional one, since Burger didn't want to be responsible for convicting an innocent person. So to fit the formula, that bit with Shaw had to be open-ended.
 
I got my copy signed by Tony Isabella back in April. I moderated a panel with him about Black Lightning at the East Coast Comicon.

Having Cogley be headquartered in the Bradbury Building was a stroke of genius.
 
I liked this book it's a very good story.I read it last year. The Perry Mason type story telling is what makes this TOS story unique.I like how the mystery about the crime is solved was really clever.

Yeah, it was a great book to read while sitting on the beach. It kept my attention well. I liked the solving of the crime, my only problem was it just seemed so sudden, almost like the writers realized they had to wrap things up. One minute Cogley was dejected, thinking he cost his own case, the next minute case closed.

I also thought it was very unique, in a good way :)

I'd have loved another "Cogley Mystery".

Yeah, me too. I doubt it will ever happen, but it was an enjoyable story. I had a few minor criticisms, but overall I thought it was a good book. I also liked that Kirk and co. didn't swoop in somehow to save the day. When they showed up I thought they would become a major component in some way, but the writers kept it to a simple, mostly non-intrusive cameo.

So to fit the formula, that bit with Shaw had to be open-ended.

Yeah, I just thought there'd be something more. Kirk was bothered by how she left their conversation and I thought
there'd be a bit more explanation of what was going on. But then the book ended and I was like 'hmm, I guess that's it'. It seemed to me the writers hoped to build on that somehow on a possible future book that obviously never happened.

I bought the book when it first came out, but I've never read it.

Definitely worth a read. I had it for a while now. For the last several years I had a sort of tradition of reading 'New Frontier' books on vacation. I finished up my last New Frontier book on my last vacation and was wondering what to turn to next and I thought this book would make a great book to read on vacation and I was right.
 
It seemed to me the writers hoped to build on that somehow on a possible future book that obviously never happened.

Well, that's my point -- that it wasn't open-ended because they had specific plans for a future book, but because it was a pastiche of a long-running book series where the prosecutor lost over and over again so the dynamic was perpetually unresolved. I'm sure they wouldn't have minded doing more books, but setting up an ongoing Cogley-Shaw rivalry was just part of the Perry Mason pastiche.
 
Well, that's my point -- that it wasn't open-ended because they had specific plans for a future book, but because it was a pastiche of a long-running book series where the prosecutor lost over and over again so the dynamic was perpetually unresolved. I'm sure they wouldn't have minded doing more books, but setting up an ongoing Cogley-Shaw rivalry was just part of the Perry Mason pastiche.

Yeah, I mean that makes sense I guess. It's just when I read it I found it a loose thread. It seemed there was supposed to be more, but your explanation is as good as any.

Another loose thread to me was earlier when the defendant Cogley defended at the beginning of the book seemed to show an interest in Cogley's assistant, even noting a certain attraction to her, it was dropped. I thought he would appear in some fashion later in the book. But he was never heard from again and it just seemed odd they were building toward something and poof, it was gone.

But I liked some of the backstory, tying in Section 31 to his other assistant for example, and even some mentions of Captain Archer's dealings with the Klingon criminal justice system. I always find it interesting in later books when someone from the original series (or even later series) reflects on something from Captain Archer or other aspects of Enterprise.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top