Re: Decision on Deflategate
Is it a factor, sure. But they are still both things involving the integrity of the game. If someone has a DUI and prior drunk in public convictions (or reckless driving convictions) or if someone has an Assault and Battery and prior Threatening Phone Calls or Destruction of Property convictions, that weighs more strongly (also, frankly, all convictions are generally considered in sentencing decisions, but I suppose I'm digressing).
I do think that's worth pointing out. People still remember it as if it's recent (and eight years isn't that long of a time). If it was still the Patriots organization but Brady and Belichick were retired, that would be an entirely different conversation.
I'd agree with you completely...if they had been caught videotaping people. Then it's second offense, obviously didn't learn, etc. Doesn't it matter that these, you know, aren't the same "crime"? You don't get 30 days in jail for jaywalking just because you had a speeding ticket a few years ago. How many years will Belichick get suspended now if the Pats get accused of tampering or something? Or is it a 3rd strike situation and he's banned for life?
Is it a factor, sure. But they are still both things involving the integrity of the game. If someone has a DUI and prior drunk in public convictions (or reckless driving convictions) or if someone has an Assault and Battery and prior Threatening Phone Calls or Destruction of Property convictions, that weighs more strongly (also, frankly, all convictions are generally considered in sentencing decisions, but I suppose I'm digressing).
And that the two "crimes" were 8 years apart should factor a little into your repeat offender narrative, no?
I do think that's worth pointing out. People still remember it as if it's recent (and eight years isn't that long of a time). If it was still the Patriots organization but Brady and Belichick were retired, that would be an entirely different conversation.