I would, provided we're operating from the most basic definition of "feminism" - a belief that men and women, though different, are and ought to be equal and that neither sex ought to be given more power or influence than the other on the basis of sex, that no sex is "naturally" dominant or "naturally" deserves power.
Yep that's what I mean![]()
Curious. Would you allow for individuals in partnership to take a more dominant or submissive role in their relationship with each other, so long as this was not a coerced or forced state?
Oh I think I see a minor difference. In the first case, its about both sexes being equal, and in the second case its about elevating women's rights and privileges to that of men.
Sort of. Or to put it another way, egalitarianism is concerned with working to maintain equality for all people; feminism is specifically concerned with issues regarding women (although my understanding is that it's branched out somewhat). They aren't so much different as the one is more focused than the other.