I was watching Rascals last night for trivial reasons (let's just say I never realized there was a link between TNG and Sparks), and something about the explanation about what had happened to Picard and the others seemed contrived or outdated. Resetting their bodies back to the years before adolescence would necessarily affect the structures of the brains in a number of ways, and if they were to grow normally again, many of the neural structures would be reconfigured such that it would be impossible to say that they would become the same people.
I don't want to put too much on the writers' awareness of neurology--certainly a lot has been learned since the episode aired. Indeed, they would have been fools to put a hormonal Picard in charge of people's lives, let alone massive equipment. However, it seems unreasonably to treat the brain as storage space and how we think and what we know as software. Picard, Guinan, O'Brien and Ro would probably need to go through many of the experiences (albeit with modifications) of any adolescent of the era before they could function in their adult lives again.
On edit: my apologies for the misspelling in title.
I don't want to put too much on the writers' awareness of neurology--certainly a lot has been learned since the episode aired. Indeed, they would have been fools to put a hormonal Picard in charge of people's lives, let alone massive equipment. However, it seems unreasonably to treat the brain as storage space and how we think and what we know as software. Picard, Guinan, O'Brien and Ro would probably need to go through many of the experiences (albeit with modifications) of any adolescent of the era before they could function in their adult lives again.
On edit: my apologies for the misspelling in title.