The new Transformer toys and Indiana Jones toys are garbage.
^Plastic Slinky was around when I was in elementary school, and I'm 32. But they don't work as well as the metal ones.
The only one that bothered me was Polly Pocket, because I've seen it then and now, and the older version was actually more fun to play with. It was a substantial change.
But I can't believe they are complaining about things like Slinky and Hacky Sack. Seriously?!
Like I said before: Big whiny babies, crying over toys that aren't really theirs anymore.
The Transformers of today have many advantages over the ones from yesteryear (not that I don't love the 80's TFs or consider them classic toys). Among them are more complex transformations, inventive action gimmicks, better sculpting and a greater resemblance to their animated counterparts. In 1984, Bumblebee looked only about 60% like his animation model, in 2008, he looks about 97% like his animation model. That's a long way for a toy that has to look good in at least two forms. There has also been a movement to make sure parts integrate with both forms, which leads to less parts getting lost over time.The new Transformer toys and Indiana Jones toys are garbage.
Has anyone seen the newest Tamagotchis? There's like nine of those little bastards living in there now! I can't keep up with that!
I'm annoyed the newer Monopoly sets come with some crazy debitcard machine for transactions, eliminating money.
Which has, IMHO, many problems. Not the least of which not being able to not see how other players are doing but for younger players to, perhaps, learn the value of money and crude math.
Something that should be on the list, but is not, is how Hasbro has utterly ruined Clue. And they DO NOT have an "original" version still available.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.