If there is any self-respect for Star Trek, there won't be a tie. JJ Abrams would have to be a dummy to do so, and I don't think he is.
commodore64 said:
Are you kidding me? The book was not that popular. Not even in the top ten Star Trek books. Enterprise books, unfortunately, don't sell well.
... what, because including some casual allusion to Enterprise would make people stay away from the movie? A reasonable reference would excite most fans, be basically neutral for the average person. I suppose some of the folks who want Enterprise stricken from the record could boo when the allusion is made, but that's going to be about as effective in changing people's minds as pointing out that it was Romulans, not Klingons, seen near Gamma Hydra IV before the Kobayashi Maru test.commodore64 said:
If there is any self-respect for Star Trek, there won't be a tie. JJ Abrams would have to be a dummy to do so, and I don't think he is.
Lady Conqueror said:
it's more likely to be a broad reference to Ent, at best, rather than something specific from a tie-in novel.
And we can add the names of Kirk's parents, George and Winona as well.Sci said:
Lady Conqueror said:
it's more likely to be a broad reference to Ent, at best, rather than something specific from a tie-in novel.
To be fair, elements from the novels have made it into the canon before. Sulu's first name of Hikaru was first established in a Trek novel from the early 80s before they canonized it in Star Trek VI, for instance, and the producers of TOS Remastered recently decided to replace the space station from "The Ultimate Computer" with a version of the Watchtower-class starbase from the novel series Star Trek: Vanguard.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.