Disagree. Whether you like it is a separate issue, but Sarah Connor was a central character in Genisys.Sarah was only "front and center" in THREE of six movies. The first two (the ones that worked), and the "too-little-too-late" sixth.
Disagree. Whether you like it is a separate issue, but Sarah Connor was a central character in Genisys.Sarah was only "front and center" in THREE of six movies. The first two (the ones that worked), and the "too-little-too-late" sixth.
Huh. you're right. I really have blocked most of that movie out of my memory. And given that Emilia Clarke was totally completely and utterly forgettable in the role, forgive me for forgetting.Disagree. Whether you like it is a separate issue, but Sarah Connor was a central character in Genisys.
No worries. It's not like it was a transformational cultural experience.Huh. you're right. I really have blocked most of that movie out of my memory. And given that Emilia Clarke was totally completely and utterly forgettable in the role, forgive me for forgetting.
It should have stayed a two movie series.
They succeeded in changing the future in T2, and the future was changed again by the T-X and the T-850 in T3. The message was that the war was inevitable, not that winning was hopeless. The whole point of Skynet sending Terminators back in time is BECAUSE humanity won the war.But in fairness, the franchise did go downhill starting with T3, which gave us the "can't win, don't try" message.
They succeeded in changing the future in T2, and the future was changed again by the T-X and the T-850 in T3. The message was that the war was inevitable, not that winning was hopeless. The whole point of Skynet sending Terminators back in time is BECAUSE humanity won the war.
My friend, choose to live instead.Haven't seen the last movie yet...
I think some movies like Marvel definitely can't be done on a small budget and the boat has sailed with the F&F franchise and it's growing over the top action. But considering how much of a failure the last Terminator movie was I think it's ok to take it back to basics and do a smaller budget movie. Look at how successful the Invisible Man movie was. Made for just $7 million and made $134 million world wide (it might have made more if not for covid as it hadn't been released everywhere yet).Part of the problem is that movies are considerably different to what they were in the 80's, especially action and comedy movies. Nowadays it's almost like they have to have a big action/comedy sequence every 5-10 minutes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.