I was hoping for a truly "new and different" storyline. Which would have used a different villian. Using the same villian from S:2 can only lead to comparisons.
This reminds me of something, but I can't put my finger on it.
I was hoping for a truly "new and different" storyline. Which would have used a different villian. Using the same villian from S:2 can only lead to comparisons.
That suit is really...yuch!
The suit looks great. So glad they ditched the Speedo.
Good list. Four and Five are trivial, but I agree with the rest.
One thing I'm wondering about... nearly everyone and his dog was complaining about Lex Luthor's ploy in Superman Return. Everybody went "What, AGAIN real estate?!"
And now this is essentially a remake of Superman I and II with better effects, but nobody bitches about that?
From what I've read Luthor was in the early drafts but doesn't seem to be in the film and it's possible we'll have LexCorp in the background.
I like fun. Real Estate Luthor and Otis were not fun.Real Estate Luthor has always sucked. Along with Otis, the worst thing in the first Reeve film.
God forbid a superhero movie try to have a little bit of fun.
Is there a verified plot synopsis that backs that up?One thing I'm wondering about... nearly everyone and his dog was complaining about Lex Luthor's ploy in Superman Return. Everybody went "What, AGAIN real estate?!"
And now this is essentially a remake of Superman I and II with better effects, but nobody bitches about that?
Outside the origin angle and Zod(who hasn't been on the silver screen in 30 years), who isn't a fair gripe compared to Luthor, is there anything else to back up what your saying? Two shared points does not compute as same in my book.
It would be creative fail if the real estate scheme is used. Not to mention outdated for the character. Luthor has been portrayed no less than 3 times in major Superman media projects as a corporate mogul over the past 20 years.
I was hoping for a truly "new and different" storyline. Which would have used a different villian. Using the same villian from S:2 can only lead to comparisons.
This reminds me of something, but I can't put my finger on it.
The guy in All Star Superman was basically a combination of the corporate mogul and mad scientist. Morrison is the one who really cemented the corporate mogul during his JLA run. Luthor the globalist who has delusions of grandeur but continues to be thwarted by Superman and the Justice League.
I don't think we'll see Lex at all until the sequel...if there is one.
^ Well, we never got one to Superman Returns, did we?
Pre-release the same things were said of Superman Returns.^ Well, we never got one to Superman Returns, did we?
True...even though I really liked that movie...despite its flaws. But somehow I have it in my mind that Man of Steel will be better and so i think the chances that it won't get a sequel are low. But I could be very wrong!
I was excited when I heard Kevin Spacey was going to be Luthor...then disappointed to discover he was DonnerVerse Luthor.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.