^I was thinking the same thing about how they have time now to realize the mistake and could easily fix it before it airs.
Supergirl TV Series is being work on.
- Thread starter yenny
- Start date
I actually liked it that Clark had maybe 10 years on Lois in the 1978 Movie.
Young Lois was in the train, Young Clark was running past to get home from School near the beginning.
So when they met 20 years later in Metropolis and they then looked the same age, it kinda implied that he was ageing much slower than a human.
Young Lois was in the train, Young Clark was running past to get home from School near the beginning.
So when they met 20 years later in Metropolis and they then looked the same age, it kinda implied that he was ageing much slower than a human.
^ Still not seeing the problem, but whatever.
2015 - 24 = 1991. (Krypton exploded 24 years ago.)
1991 + 24 + 12 = 2027. (I spent 24 years in the Phantom zone, then 12 years on Earth growing up, and now it is the present 2015.)
Here's the good thing, they can fix it.
They have 6 months to alter 1 second of an audio track.
Will they do it?
I thought it was stated that the time in the Phantom Zone didn't pass the same way so it's more like 1991 + PHANTOM ZONE + 12 = 2015
^ Still not seeing the problem, but whatever.
2015 - 24 = 1991. (Krypton exploded 24 years ago.)
1991 + 24 + 12 = 2027. (I spent 24 years in the Phantom zone, then 12 years on Earth growing up, and now it is the present 2015.)
Here's the good thing, they can fix it.
They have 6 months to alter 1 second of an audio track.
Will they do it?
I thought it was stated that the time in the Phantom Zone didn't pass the same way so it's more like 1991 + PHANTOM ZONE + 12 = 2015
That's not the problem - the problem is she states that she landed on earth 24 years after she left because of being in the zone - so it's accounted for.
Kara was in the Phantom Zone for 24 years.
She was alseep and not ageing.
I'm thinking that her ship towed the prison to Earth.
Screw this show! It's ruined now!
^ If I were to guess, I would say that, like FOX with Gotham, CBS paid an extra fee to get total unrestricted use of the Superman/Supergirl property, especially since, like FOX was with Gotham, they were the first network to 'bite' on the SG project.
Maybe - I'm guessing the reason we don't see his face is that if they ever do use him they want to think carefully about who that would be...
A random thought occurred to me -
Is there anything in the pilot to suggest that the Danvers are alive in the present day? There is nothing to say they are dead either but I wonder if that is undecided at this point.
I want more of Kara's mum and dad.
I think that where the use of Superman is involved, they're contractually obliged to do a lot of winking and nudging.
CBS is the network that ordered and will air the show...Warner Bros is the studio that owns and produces it. Warners sets the conditions as to how restricted the show's handling of cousin Kal will be.
Right... they'd want to take care with that casting, not just bring in some day player and expect him to be Superman.
Remember Linda Park? A TV reporter of that name, played by Olivia Cheng, appeared in the second Barry Allen episode of Arrow and again in the Flash pilot in news reports about the particle accelerator. But the producers later ignored that, cast the considerably younger Malese Jow as Linda Park, and made her a sports reporter for a newspaper. It seems like they're being more careful about casting this time around. (Olivia Cheng, meanwhile, went on to play a lead role in Netflix's Marco Polo, as the prostitute/assassin sister of the show's lead villain, who was played by another Arrow veteran, Chin Han.)
Maybe the show's present is 2027. That could explain how Superman had been around for a while in the Arrowverse.
We know that Helen Slater was offered the option of being a recurring guest star, so I think the chances are fairly good that we'll at least see Mrs. Danvers again.
She's Kara's maternal Aunt and is played by Laura Benanti, who also plays Kara's mother Alura.
CBS is the network that ordered and will air the show...Warner Bros is the studio that owns and produces it. Warners sets the conditions as to how restricted the show's handling of cousin Kal will be.
FOX paid Warner Bros./DC an extra licensing fee for unrestricted access to anything and everything having to do with Batman, thus giving Gotham's showrunners the ability to use practically any character(s) they want, and I think the chances are very good that CBS has done the same thing with regards to the Superman/Supergirl property.
It kind of comes across that they have some sort of restriction about mentioning Superman by name. "Superman" is only said once during the info dump at the beginning. After that he's referred to as Kara's cousin or is talked about while awkwardly avoiding saying "Superman" by referring to him as "person who wears a cape", "my friend in blue", "him", and "he".CBS is the network that ordered and will air the show...Warner Bros is the studio that owns and produces it. Warners sets the conditions as to how restricted the show's handling of cousin Kal will be.
FOX paid Warner Bros./DC an extra licensing fee for unrestricted access to anything and everything having to do with Batman, thus giving Gotham's showrunners the ability to use practically any character(s) they want, and I think the chances are very good that CBS has done the same thing with regards to the Superman/Supergirl property.
Similar threads
