• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Supergirl TV Series is being work on.

I think the one exception to that is Hank Henshaw, who only refers to her as "Miss Danvers" throughout the show, even when she's in her Supergirl costume. But that kinda makes sense for his character, since he is clearly not a fan of superheroes of any kind and wouldn't be caught dead calling them by their superhero name.
 
I'd not go that far, to me it's more likely that someone finally discovered the fact that girls can also ne nerds, can also read and enjoy comicbooks and that girls may like strong female heroes.. and that girls have money too! :eek::eek:

Yeah, someone already pointed out above that all the people involved reportedly wanted a Supergirl series all along. And I'm very glad to hear that. I was cynical about the prospect that network executives would actually understand the appeal of female heroes, but I'd be delighted to be wrong about that.

My wife doesn't watch The Flash or Arrow with me but she was very excited about the prospect of a Supergirl TV show. She has very fond memories of watching the Helen Slater movie as a young girl.
 
But the concept of Superheroes may be alien to these people.

Maybe half of Metropolis was razed in the movie, but this isn't that continuity.

Which if it had happened had just been aliens being assholes and or careless.

Humans putting on a mask and fighting crime with human super powers?

Hank doesn't like (superpowered) Aliens, which is different.

They immediately labelled Supergirl a "Hero" in the press. Sure she caught a plane, but was Kara really in any danger? She saved some people at virtually/conceivably no danger to her invulnerable self. It almost felt like they didn't call Supergirl a hero because she saved the plane but because she had powers, rather than how she used those powers. It's almost like they used the wrong word.
 
She has very fond memories of watching the Helen Slater movie as a young girl.

Then she must not remember the plot... ;)

Seriously, I did like Slater in the role, and the Jerry Goldsmith music is terrific, and the bit where she discovers her powers on Earth and soars around is pretty awesome, so there are things to be fond of. But good grief, that plot. Superman got to save the world, but Supergirl was stuck with fighting over a man.

One thing you can say about the Salkind Super-movies is that they're very Silver Age. For all their pretensions of verisimilitude, they're very much in the vein of the goofy, campy, fanciful Superman comics of the '60s with the ludicrous superpowers and the comedic villains and so forth. Indeed, one reason I think Superman III actually works better than the first two films is because it isn't torn between Silver Age goofiness and modern naturalism and drama the way the first two are -- it fully embraces the comedy-adventure style and is more consistent in its tone than its predecessors. But Supergirl gets the short end of the Silver Age stick, because that was an era when female lead characters got stuck obsessing over their love lives and getting caught up in constant petty rivalries over men. I never really thought about it before, but the Supergirl movie is very much a story in that vein.
 
Yeah I just rewatched the Supergirl movie a few days ago, and it is somehow even worse than I remembered. I used to think it had a few good moments, like the Phantom Zone scenes or Supergirl fighting the construction equipment, but even those seem really lame now.

The movie does have a really catchy theme though, and Helen Slater looks really cute throughout. Just a shame she didn't have a much better story to work with, and that her character was written in such a wimpy way. Because the few times she actually does get to assert herself in a commanding way (particularly towards the end), she does it really damn well.
 
Even as a tiny child, I couldn't understand how minuscule and unimportant Jimmy's role was in the 1984 movie, and more so, why the hell wasn't he the love interest for Supergirl?

Pa-pow!

But I was 8, so every thing else was beyond coolness, and I am very afraid to go back in there 30 years later.
 
Last edited:
I have to admit, I was secretly hoping they'd find a way to rework the movie theme for the new TV show.

Not surprised it didn't happen, but it would have been cool.
 
But the concept of Superheroes may be alien to these people.

Maybe half of Metropolis was razed in the movie, but this isn't that continuity.

Which if it had happened had just been aliens being assholes and or careless.

Humans putting on a mask and fighting crime with human super powers?

Hank doesn't like (superpowered) Aliens, which is different.

They immediately labelled Supergirl a "Hero" in the press. Sure she caught a plane, but was Kara really in any danger? She saved some people at virtually/conceivably no danger to her invulnerable self. It almost felt like they didn't call Supergirl a hero because she saved the plane but because she had powers, rather than how she used those powers. It's almost like they used the wrong word.

Why would you have to be in danger to be considered a hero? People call lifeguards and medics and doctors heroes all the time for doing things that are not even remotely life threatening to them. If a pilot was in that plane and used an extraordinary amount of skill to land it so that no one got hurt, you can bet the newspapers would call him a hero, even though he was literally trying to save himself along with everyone else.

Kryptonians are almost never going to be in life threatening danger on planet earth, anyway. That doesn't mean that their actions to save other people's lives and stop criminals suddenly stop being heroic unless there's a major supervillain in the mix trying to kill them.
 
But the concept of Superheroes may be alien to these people.

The concept of
aliens seems to be alien to the general public - remember the conversation that Kara and Winn have where they discuss where Supergirl comes from and they dismiss Aliens as "not existing" - which suggests that the origins of Superman are not widely known.
 
I thought that that was one of those temporal mistakes people make like "Is the pope polish?" or "This is the 20th century for ####s sake!" or "There are nine planets in our Solar system".

Facts that had been facts for most of their lives until very recently.
 
Well Superman doesn't exactly look like the traditional movie alien, so it's probably easy for people to forget that he is one. And in fact I don't think he was ever referred to as an alien in the original Superman movies either (I think it was only ever alluded to with terms like "strange visitor").
 
And in fact I don't think he was ever referred to as an alien in the original Superman movies either (I think it was only ever alluded to with terms like "strange visitor").

In Superman: The Movie, Supes spilled his whole origin story to Lois in her big interview, including the fact that he was from Krypton. That's how Lex Luthor was somehow able to deduce the existence of kryptonite and predict where to find a meteorite made of it merely by reading Lois's article.

In the Reeves TV series, Superman was pretty open about his origins; it didn't often come up, but at least the smarter villains, and several friendly mad scientists, knew about Krypton and kryptonite. I think I remember something about a scientist deducing what kind of planet Superman had to be from based on his powers. That might even have been the guy who synthesized the bar of synthetic kryptonite that was a recurring threat to Superman in the show.

On the radio series, which often had sloppy continuity, nobody at the Daily Planet knew Superman's alien origin until Clark told them (narrating a rerun/re-enactment of the script of the series premiere), in order to convince them of the reality of kryptonite and the threat it posed. (Clark claimed that he'd gotten the story from Superman, and naturally the others didn't find that suspicious at all.) Even though Clark told them about Superman's weakness in strictest confidence, insisting it could mean the end of Superman if the public found out, Perry and Lois immediately betrayed him and spilled the whole story on the front page of the Planet, leading directly to the theft of the kryptonite meteorite that only Superman and a few scientists had previously known about, which led in turn to the creation of the Atom Man, Superman's worst arch-enemy on radio, who came closer than anyone else to killing him. But I'm getting ahead of myself; a few weeks earlier in the storyline, when Clark was trying to convince Perry and Lois of the danger of the stolen kryptonite -- whose theft their betrayal and expose had been directly responsible for -- they didn't even recognize the concept of kryptonite and scoffed at the idea that anything could hurt Superman. Either the characters' guilt was so profound that they suffered partial amnesia, or the writers were so harried churning out new scripts by the day that they simply forgot what they'd previously established.

Anyway, there haven't been that many interpretations of Superman where his alien origins were unknown or a secret. There have been versions where Clark himself didn't find out until his adolescence or adulthood, but once he did find out, he usually wasn't that secretive about it where the rest of the world was concerned.
 
^ All true, but I was referring to how the actual term "alien" was never used in the Reeve movies. Which seems to follow what was done in the comics back then as well, since I don't remember him being described that way much when I was a kid either.

It was obviously no secret he was from Krypton, but it seems like it's only more recently that writers have really played up the fact that's he's a true alien who only just happens to look like us and who may or may not be trustworthy and that not everyone is willing to embrace, etc etc. You know, all the usual stuff that tends to be explored in alien stories.

In fact in the Reeve movies it was almost portrayed that he came from some strange, ethereal higher plane or dimension than the typical Star Trek-style alien planet.
 
Um, I think the majority of people commenting in here right now have seen it. Are you going to call out every one of them as well? Lol
 
(And yes, it's really weird that both DC and Marvel ended up with major heroines named Danvers. Unless Carol's name was a deliberate knockoff.)

Ms Marvel is created in part to simply control another name with word Marvel in it. The idea was also to have a character be a symbol for the modern woman's quest for identity.
At the time of her origin female comic fans debated whether she was a strong female character or not. The main problem being that her hero form was a copy of Captain Marvel, and her secret identity Carol Danvers was a copy of Supergirl. In some sense Carol is a copy of a copy of a copy.

Why would Marvel use the name Danvers? I don't know. It could have been lazy. It could have been meant to show that this is Marvel's Supergirl. It might have been meant to poke fun at their competitor. What is known is that they did it.
http://toylab.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-battle-of-danvers-supergirl-vs.html
 
Um, I think the majority of people commenting in here right now have seen it. Are you going to call out every one of them as well? Lol

Sure. If it is indeed the case that "the majority of the people commenting in here right now have seen it," then all of you are not cool. All of you should be ashamed of yourselves because you're no better than the scumbag who posted it online to begin with. Just because it's there and just because you can take it doesn't mean it's not wrong to do so. Well done.
 
Ms Marvel is created in part to simply control another name with word Marvel in it. The idea was also to have a character be a symbol for the modern woman's quest for identity.
At the time of her origin female comic fans debated whether she was a strong female character or not. The main problem being that her hero form was a copy of Captain Marvel, and her secret identity Carol Danvers was a copy of Supergirl. In some sense Carol is a copy of a copy of a copy.

Why would Marvel use the name Danvers? I don't know. It could have been lazy. It could have been meant to show that this is Marvel's Supergirl. It might have been meant to poke fun at their competitor. What is known is that they did it.
http://toylab.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-battle-of-danvers-supergirl-vs.html


By that blogger's own admission, they're just guessing that Carol was named after Supergirl. Also, their research is poor, because they claim that the Silver Age Supergirl went by Kara Danvers, when actually it was Linda; in fact, she was originally Linda Lee (part of the bizarre Silver Age trope requiring every woman in Superman's life to have the initials "LL" and to have the characters comment frequently on the coincidence) and only later came to be adopted by the Danvers family. So that article really doesn't clarify things in the slightest.
 
Wasn't Carol Danvers introduced as a Captain Marvel supporting character long before she became Ms. Marvel?! I'm in the middle of reading the Avengers Kree/Skrull War, and I think she (or rather a Skrull double of her) is meeting with Captain Marvel at the Avengers Mansion.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top