• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Supergirl - Season 2

This Superman already feels more like Superman than the Snyder version did in two movies and I like that Hoechlin actually acted a bit differently as Clark than he did as Superman, the conversation he had with Perry was fun.

I can't wait for the season premiere.

Meanwhile, in our first look at Supergirl season 2 footage, it literally takes only 30 seconds before we see the Vancouver Central Library, standing in for a Metropolis building. It's like they did that on purpose to get the "Yes, we're in Vancouver now, folks" business out of the way.
Isn't it more likely they just thought it was an interesting looking building that fits into their version national city?
 
Yeah, but "It conflicts with my preconceptions" is not proof that someone is lying.

First clip:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Looks good to me:)

I think it starts in a month here so I guess I'll be trying to avoid too many spoilers.
 
As a rule, though, there's such a thing as the presumption of innocence. If you expect someone to be honest and they turn out to be lying, that's their fault. But if you assume they're lying and they actually aren't, then you're the one in the wrong. So giving others the benefit of the doubt is a basic part of just generally not being a jerk. If you're going to accuse someone of lying, it should be based on evidence, and "Well, some other person with a similar job lied once" is not evidence by any rational standard.
I always go in assuming the people in charge of these shows are telling the truth when they talk about what will or won't happen, but I also keep in mind that people have outright lied in similar situations before.
I was mainly just talking about people in general, not myself specifically.
 
Isn't it more likely they just thought it was an interesting looking building that fits into their version national city?

First off, the scene was set in Metropolis, as I said. Second, I said it's like they did that, not that I literally believe they did. It's a rhetorical device to express my amusement. The library is one of the most famous and frequently-used landmarks in Vancouver-based productions, ubiquitous to the point of cliche, so it's amusing that it takes precisely 30 seconds to show up in the first Vancouver-based Supergirl footage we see. In fact, it's so on-the-nose that I believe it's at least possible that they did it on purpose, since they know a lot of their viewers are genre-savvy and used to spotting Vancouver locations by now. A possibility is not a certainty, of course, but I wouldn't be surprised.
 
Well it is the first time we are seeing a major city on this show that is not National City. Being Metropolis it makes sense they would lead with a distinctly unique new location. It will be interesting how they handle Vancouver locations after that when it mostly be representing National City. Not to mention Star City and Central City all on the same network. Plus the various times and locations on Legends.
 
Well it is the first time we are seeing a major city on this show that is not National City. Being Metropolis it makes sense they would lead with a distinctly unique new location.

Not so unique, though, when we've seen it more than once on Arrow and The Flash. (E.g. it was the restaurant where Barry and Patti Spivot had their romantic dinner.) It's kind of like opening a Star Trek episode with a scene filmed at Vasquez Rocks. (Which is what the 2009 Star Trek movie originally would've done, if they hadn't cut the Spock-birth scene and led with the Kelvin instead.)


It will be interesting how they handle Vancouver locations after that when it mostly be representing National City. Not to mention Star City and Central City all on the same network. Plus the various times and locations on Legends.

I'm hoping they'll make extensive use of their digital model of National City to give it a distinct look from the others. Apparently the skyline in the pilot-episode scenes on the Catco roof was digitally added, according to the FX reel that came out over the summer.
 
Yeah the LA skyline will still stand in for "National City" while we have just seen Vancouver represent metropolis.

Well, NC is basically LA, but since it's usually a digital model, they may have modified it some. I don't know LA's skyline well enough to say for sure. It's surprising to see the Berlanti shows' behind-the-scenes FX reels and discover just how much of what looks like live-action cityscapes is actually all-digital.
 
LA AKA National City which the show will still use a a digital model

Kq7Xayt.jpg


You should be familiar with this building since it's used alot when Power Rangers was in L.A

LpwrgrZ.jpg
 
I'm familiar with the US Bank tower -- it's pretty much the most recognizable building in LA's skyline -- but I don't remember it from Power Rangers. I mainly remember them using the Brandeis-Bardin Institute on top of Vasquez Rocks as the Command Center.

Come to think of it, I don't recall Supergirl ever visiting Vasquez Rocks during their first season. That's a bit surprising for a genre show filmed in LA.
 
I heard Luthor say a few years ago... "The only reason you married that bumbling oaf, is because he was the only one dumb enough not to notice that you're ####ing Superman behind his back."
 
I'm familiar with the US Bank tower -- it's pretty much the most recognizable building in LA's skyline -- but I don't remember it from Power Rangers. I mainly remember them using the Brandeis-Bardin Institute on top of Vasquez Rocks as the Command Center.

Come to think of it, I don't recall Supergirl ever visiting Vasquez Rocks during their first season. That's a bit surprising for a genre show filmed in LA.



First episode of Light speed rescue to name one instance

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


cHgYrOI.jpg
 
Please not the bungling, dopey, clumsy, Kent again. We have had more than enough of that nonsense.

He just seemed diffident toward his boss, which is pretty much what you'd expect of anyone being chewed out by Perry White, and pretty much identical to how Kara acts toward Cat Grant.
 
I didn't see him being any of those things in the clip. Dopey is in the eye of the beholder I guess, but I saw no bungling or clumsiness.

The only person I have ever heard say "lickity split" (other than me?) is Arnold Judas Rimmer, although in Clark's defence, that did happen 3 million years into the future (or 200 years into the future?).

Which is of course a mirror of 70s Movie Lois telling Clark that he is not allowed to say "Keen".
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top