Looks like there's some debris in the background, so presumably Superman's been in a fight and gotten his outfit dirty, while Supergirl seems to have just arrived, so her suit is still clean.
That is misrepresenting my position. I consider the trunks to be an important part of the aesthetics of Superman's costume design, not his "character." They were part of the iconic costume for 73 years and were only dropped a measly 5 years ago. They give the costume a balance of design that it lacks without them, complementing the red cape and boots by providing some red in the middle to break up the blue. There are valid artistic reasons for their presence, which is why nobody altered that aspect of the design for 73 years, and the decision to get rid of them 5 years ago was just an overreaction to a hoary old joke.
I would love to see some interviews with artists who would say that is the primary reason it didn't change. Removing the truns just seems waaay more dramatic then say, changing to top of the boots, or the yellow belt (which I am sure has subtley changes over the years). I think it's the fear of adverse fan/ublic reaction than some made-up artistic reasons, but ALL of the artists for Superman's first 70+ years
After all, there are more people in real life today who wear trunks than there are who wear capes. But Superman always has the cape because it's an intrinsic part of his design. So there's no valid reason why the trunks should be treated differently.
If someone JUST wears a red cape, but has "normal" clothes (like young Clark in Man of Steel -- white t-shirt and blue jeans), most Americans would INSTANTLY know that was a Superman reference (or at the very least SOME kind of Superhero).
[/quote]
Wearing red BRIEFS (and not boxers, as modern athletes would do) OVER some kind of pants/leggings would look silly to many A FEW might get the Superman reference, but nowhere NEAR as many as with the cape.
Modern pro wrestlers might wear briefs..but look ridiculous outside a pro-wrestling match (which is something people associate with fake reality entertainment, not Superman or superheroes)
And please stop obsessing on the damn modesty thing. That is one minor factor out of many, largely a piece of the historical background, yet you insist on falsely claiming it's my entire argument. If you're going to cite my position at all, then please make the effort to cite it correctly instead of reducing it to a caricature.
Now you know how many of us perceive some of your responses to our posts.
I mean, you over-analyze/ fan-splain what some people write as obvious JOKES.
You also kind of talk down to us, and miss the REAL points we want to make, or at least feel like you respect them even if you don't agree.
We all do you love you, and appreciate the insight you bring...but sometimes some of us actually ALREADY know it, and don't need someone to "help us understand"
And regarding modesty -- it's the only thing that really makes sense to me as to why to keep it (or why it was there in the first place) -- most everything else seems like your own personal preference that certainly I perceive as you pushing as fact.
If anything, it would make more sense for Superman to keep the trunks and lose the tights. After all, as artist J. Bone
once pointed out, he is solar-powered, so from a strictly practical standpoint, the more skin he exposes to the sun, the better. And just as his original costume reflected the look of '30s strongmen and acrobats, the modern equivalent could be something like a pro wrestler or bodybuilder, and they tend to wear trunks and very little else. Of course, then you'd lose the S-shield, so maybe some kind of He-Man-like harness?
That's one of the things that I hated about John Byrne making super a "human solar battery" waaay back immediate post-Crisis. That Superman just didn't "tatse" good, like Man of Steel & B v S in at least my first viewing (several viewings later have helped me appreciate some of the aspects that threw me for a loop)
Logically, Superman should be like Starfire & her people, and be in briefs (not boxers) absorbing the sun to be powerful. Superman in only red tights might appeal to some communities . But that just doesn't feel like Superman to me.