• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

STXI ready for "soft prep"

More than cautiously optimistic. These guys seem to "get it."
Hope they can do with this sequel what The Dark Knight did for Batman.
 
Nope, nope, and... no. For every short skirt there needs to be 5 minutes of shirtless scenes per male actor to compensate.
 
All the hopes and demands that people go back to making movies the way they were made to satisfy an audience twenty years ago are doomed to disappointment and failure.
 
All the hopes and demands that people go back to making movies the way they were made to satisfy an audience twenty years ago are doomed to disappointment and failure.


Sssh, don't bring that logic and rationality here on the internet.
 
Nope, nope, and... no. For every short skirt there needs to be 5 minutes of shirtless scenes per male actor to compensate.

At that point, why don't we just meet halfway and make it a porno? :p

jv67mr.jpg
 
I am glad to hear that there is some movement in the pre-production stage of the movie. I am really looking forward to this next movie!
 
I just really hope they dump the shakey cam fad and that bad lighting. And make the skirts shorter.

Shakey cam "fad", 1994 and counting...it started with Babylon 5...

All the hopes and demands that people go back to making movies the way they were made to satisfy an audience twenty years ago are doomed to disappointment and failure.

They also like to re-write history..

RAMA
 
I just really hope they dump the shakey cam fad and that bad lighting. And make the skirts shorter.

Shakey cam "fad", 1994 and counting...it started with Babylon 5...

It's really not that prominately used. 1998's Saving Private Ryan was when I believe made it very popular. Briefly. The reality is that movie makers spent decades perfecting the steady cam imaging until technology came along and made it a reality.

My whole point is that it doesn't represent how we see. Our eyes float in ours heads, allowing us to focus on something without the image bobbing around. Our inner ear plays a huge role in that too.

So why make something shakey intentionaly? It's a silly gimmick to make things look more actiony and dramatic. I just personally think it's a fail that's no better then the slightly sped up scenes to make people look faster.

Oh well- to each their own. I just hope they drop it. It's pointless.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nope, nope, and... no. For every short skirt there needs to be 5 minutes of shirtless scenes per male actor to compensate.

Amen! The skirts can end at the navel as long as they rip Chris' shirt a couple times or five. :rommie:

Still a year to go, huh? :p
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top