I believe you are forgetting Chris Pike in this list of captains.
I believe you are forgetting Chris Pike in this list of captains.
Picard
Strength - Reasoning and wisdom, as well as diplomacy
Weakness - Can be overly moral
Whatnow? Moral = concerned with principles of right and wrong. I disagree that someone can be 'overly moral'. Self-righteous, maybe, believing that you alone know what is right for everyone, but 'overly moral' does not work.
Has been manipulated because of his big weird libido.
Kirk: Regulary Known To Break The Prime Directive
Kirk: Regulary Known To Break The Prime Directive
Once again... I'd like to see a source for this.
Sometimes I wonder if people who ascribe certain traits and actions to Jim Kirk have actually watched Star Trek: The Original Series.
Kirk: Regulary Known To Break The Prime Directive
Once again... I'd like to see a source for this.
Sometimes I wonder if people who ascribe certain traits and actions to Jim Kirk have actually watched Star Trek: The Original Series.
Sure I have, when I said regular I meant on more than a couple of occasions during a Starship Mission (As in 5 year mission)
As for your source...
http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Prime_directive#23rd_century
SPOCK: Captain, our Prime Directive of non-interference.
KIRK: That refers to a living, growing culture. Do you think this one is?
SPOCK: Then the Prime Directive is in full force, Captain?
KIRK: No identification of self or mission. No interference with the social development of said planet.
MCCOY: No references to space, or the fact that there are other worlds, or more advanced civilisations.
Once again... I'd like to see a source for this.
Sometimes I wonder if people who ascribe certain traits and actions to Jim Kirk have actually watched Star Trek: The Original Series.
Sure I have, when I said regular I meant on more than a couple of occasions during a Starship Mission (As in 5 year mission)
As for your source...
http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Prime_directive#23rd_century
As you see at the top "Noted Violations and Possible Violations". In each instance there was an "out" that allowed Jim Kirk to continue on without facing charges for violating the Prime Directive. If the "out" exists in the language of the Prime Directive, then it isn't a Prime Directive violation. And several of those mentioned as Prime Directive violations are only so using the 24th century interpretation.
From The Return of the Archons
From Bread and CircusesSPOCK: Captain, our Prime Directive of non-interference.
KIRK: That refers to a living, growing culture. Do you think this one is?
So what we have is primarily is Jim Kirk cleaning up messes created by other Starfleet officers, Federation observers or Klingons.SPOCK: Then the Prime Directive is in full force, Captain?
KIRK: No identification of self or mission. No interference with the social development of said planet.
MCCOY: No references to space, or the fact that there are other worlds, or more advanced civilisations.
Has been manipulated because of his big weird libido.
Like to see a source on this one. Please.
Has been manipulated because of his big weird libido.
Like to see a source on this one. Please.
"Requiem for Methuselah"-Kirk falls in love- rather quickly in a tense situation- with a woman he eventually finds out be an android-and insists that he loves her and she loves him.
He then moves somewhat aggressively towards Flinn, her maker.
He gets into a fight with Flinn, when Spock warns him not to, considering the situation, he says "stay out of this, we're fighting over a woman".
She told BOTH of them to stop and she said it was HER choice, but and Kirk sort of understands, but he still urges her to go with him. Spock was still warning both of them to reconsider their actions.
Kirk admitted that he had been used by Flint to bring out emotion in the android Rayna.
Sure I have, when I said regular I meant on more than a couple of occasions during a Starship Mission (As in 5 year mission)
As for your source...
http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Prime_directive#23rd_century
As you see at the top "Noted Violations and Possible Violations". In each instance there was an "out" that allowed Jim Kirk to continue on without facing charges for violating the Prime Directive. If the "out" exists in the language of the Prime Directive, then it isn't a Prime Directive violation. And several of those mentioned as Prime Directive violations are only so using the 24th century interpretation.
From The Return of the Archons
From Bread and Circuses
So what we have is primarily is Jim Kirk cleaning up messes created by other Starfleet officers, Federation observers or Klingons.SPOCK: Then the Prime Directive is in full force, Captain?
KIRK: No identification of self or mission. No interference with the social development of said planet.
MCCOY: No references to space, or the fact that there are other worlds, or more advanced civilisations.
I agree with your points, however, Kirk readily didn't have the moral inhibitions displayed by other Captain's in relation to the Prime Directive and although he has broken it and the mission has been successfull, it should still count as a weakness since he could have in theory broken the Prime Directive and caused more harm than good
SATIE: Captain, do you believe in the Prime Directive?
PICARD: Of course.
SATIE: In fact, it's Starfleet General Order Number One, is it not?
PICARD: Your point, Admiral?
SATIE: Would it surprise you to learn that you have violated the Prime Directive a total of nine times since you took command of the Enterprise? I must say, Captain, it surprised the hell out of me.
Has been manipulated because of his big weird libido.
Like to see a source on this one. Please.
"Requiem for Methuselah"-Kirk falls in love- rather quickly in a tense situation- with a woman he eventually finds out be an android-and insists that he loves her and she loves him.
He then moves somewhat aggressively towards Flinn, her maker.
He gets into a fight with Flinn, when Spock warns him not to, considering the situation, he says "stay out of this, we're fighting over a woman".
She told BOTH of them to stop and she said it was HER choice, but and Kirk sort of understands, but he still urges her to go with him. Spock was still warning both of them to reconsider their actions.
Kirk admitted that he had been used by Flint to bring out emotion in the android Rayna.
With respect, more like a case of Kirk thinking with his heart.I agree, Kirk has caused trouble by thinking with his Dick and thats one of his weaknesses"Requiem for Methuselah"-Kirk falls in love- rather quickly in a tense situation- with a woman he eventually finds out be an android-and insists that he loves her and she loves him.
Why did Spock ask if the prime directive was in effect? Or was his actual question pertaining to it being "in full force?"So what we have is primarily is Jim Kirk cleaning up messes created by other Starfleet officers, Federation observers or Klingons.SPOCK: Then the Prime Directive is in full force, Captain?
KIRK: No identification of self or mission. No interference with the social development of said planet.
MCCOY: No references to space, or the fact that there are other worlds, or more advanced civilisations.
With respect, more like a case of Kirk thinking with his heart.I agree, Kirk has caused trouble by thinking with his Dick and thats one of his weaknesses"Requiem for Methuselah"-Kirk falls in love- rather quickly in a tense situation- with a woman he eventually finds out be an android-and insists that he loves her and she loves him.
Why did Spock ask if the prime directive was in effect? Or was his actual question pertaining to it being "in full force?"So what we have is primarily is Jim Kirk cleaning up messes created by other Starfleet officers, Federation observers or Klingons.SPOCK: Then the Prime Directive is in full force, Captain?
KIRK: No identification of self or mission. No interference with the social development of said planet.
MCCOY: No references to space, or the fact that there are other worlds, or more advanced civilisations.
I personal think that the prime directive came into effect sometime between Friday's Child and A Piece Of The Action, I don't mean that's when the Star trek writers invented it, literally that's when the Federation put it into effect. It didn't exist during Friday's Child. It cleans up a lot of Kirk's "violations" if there were no prime directive law until half way through season two.
.
With respect, more like a case of Kirk thinking with his heart.
What would you say were the strengths/weaknesses of each captain? For me, it's as so:
Kirk
Strength - Charismatic and likeable
Weakness - Too cavalier and maybe too unorthodox
Picard
Strength - Reasoning and wisdom, as well as diplomacy
Weakness - Can be overly moral
Sisko
Strength - No nonsense, takes no crap from anybody and is a strong and confident man
Weakness - Obsession, and even ego. The Michael Eddington arc indicates this
Janeway
Strength - Intelligent and protective of her crew (almost in a motherly sense)
Weakness - Can be erratic, and even overly moral like Picard
Archer
Strength - Determined and won't stop until he gets what is required
Weakness - Too indecisive sometimes, and distrusting.
Weakness
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.