But that's not the kind of story the Duffer Brothers are trying to tell. Perhaps that's something we'll get with the spin-off (even though they've already shot down the anthology series rumor), but that's not the point of this show. I agree with JD. The show is better off with no filler episodes and such.The title, "Stranger Things" just seems ripe for a monster of the week type show. A few months ago I was thinking about the similarities of Stranger Things and Fringe, from the standpoint of both shows have alternate realities. I had seen something about the show going deeper into the Upside Down and it's origins but everything just seems wrapped around Vecna. In my mind, The Upside Down could have been just multiple civilizations and monsters hunting for territory or something. We could have seen, like Fringe, a fully fledged world and I feel like the show had a missed opportunity there. Of course maybe they might get more into it in the final 4 episodes, but it feels a little late now.
Perhaps so. I don't necessarily disagree with you and I do think there's a lot more nuance to the situation than simply black and white, but I'm not going to dig too deeply into here because I think it's an interesting topic of discussion for a separate thread.Well... I'd hesitate on saying it's for the better in terms of these shorter seasons, coupling with the downturn in the amount of production, decimating the amount of reliable and stable work in television. It's almost completely eliminated the ability to make a middle-class living as a crew member, writer, or actor.
The seasons were a juggernaut of production, but it kept people employed, allowed them to get their guild insurance plans, and also fostered the ability to learn and move up within the production chain.