• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strange New Worlds Episode 7 - Those Old Scientists

Grade The Episode


  • Total voters
    319
This episode and it had many fun moments. If one were going to do this crossover, this was probably the best way to do it. There are just certain things that don't sit right with me.

Maybe I'm an overserious stiff. I just think structure is good, especially for comedies. TOS was often funny. The Trouble With Tribbles was funny precisely because everyone was their usual self, just in a silly situation.

Forget that Lower Decks is a cartoon. It's just silly. As a comedy show, one can overlook the glaring fact that nobody could ever act like Boimler and Mariner and survive. They'd have been killed in one episode. They'd never make it through Starfleet. They're unserious people, insubordinate to the core, and would have (actually have) caused serious destruction and injury. It's ok because LD is a comedy, but if you are to accept that they really are from the SNW future, it becomes too farcical to reconcile. Riker isn't even really Riker, but a goofball version.

So ultimately, I'm conflicted. I think LD should've always been set in a cartoon world similar to the Trek universe, but separate. Have the time portal be a dimensional gateway instead.

On a related note, I kind of wish officers acted like adult professionals in Trek again instead of emotional kids who needed constant levity, but that's a more minor issue.

That's (one of) the issues I have with LD the behavior in it is too farcical so it doesn't "fit." You're point about Riker being one of them. I don't see the "real" Riker going, "Give me a Warp 1, a 2, a 3..." like he's starting a jazz riff with Troi sitting there by him audibly groaning and rolling her eyes.

Is it funny? Yeah, a little. But it's hard to fit in the logic of a universe, and characters, I've loved since I was a teenager so I got annoyed. That's what LD it's annoying because it doesn't "fit."

I can mostly "take" the less serious/milatristic way people behave (I love her, but we all know Ortegas would be dressed down by every Trek captain we've seen before the current era of Trek including Pike himself.) But the LD behavior is too much on another realm and I'm being asked to accept that this is the same world where everything else happened too (even the sillier stuff we all hate.)

Square peg. Round hole.
 
Last edited:
How dare they make Trek shows that cater to different tastes? Too much diversity in way too many combinations!

I loved it. Even if it wrecked my long treasured crazy fan theory that the NCC-1701 actually was the NX-01, several times upgraded as a testbed ship in the shipyards and finally pressed into service again.

zDPO1vX.png
 
I can't even... "Spock's Brain", "Sub Rosa" and "11:59" are top-notch Star Trek episodes compared to this toilet bowl material.

Not a single redeemable thing about this dreck of a gimmick which is the worst of Trek.

0/10.
 
I think we're going to just have to accept that the Federation doesn't use "flagship" the way we do. The word picked up a new meaning over the centuries, and now means something more like "the pride of the fleet;" the best and most prestigious ship they have. Sort of what HMS Hood was for the British Empire during the interwar years.

Indeed, something tells me they don't wonder where the admiral is when someone references a flagship store, or flagship smartphone.
 
I'd watch that.

Does anyone remember one of the early books having a scene with the 1701's christening? Something about a projectile launched from lunar orbit doing what we do with a bottle of Champagne? I want to say that it was one of Foster's - he often went off on weird tangents.
It was when he was having to expand ~30 minute episodes into entire books at that point. Blish never had to do that. Also, since it was The Counterclock Incident is was him doing everything he could to avoid writing about The Counterclock Incident. It takes up maybe a third of the book and is later revealed to have been an alien induced hallucination to see how gullible space faring people are. I may not have the details exact. But I think it's the only episode he entirely dismisses.

Riker isn't even really Riker, but a goofball version.
Well...

I don't see the "real" Riker going, "Give me a Warp 1, a 2, a 3..." like he's starting a jazz riff with Troi sitting there by him audibly groaning and rolling her eyes.
If "real" Riker does NOT say "Warp 5, 6, 7, 8..." then my life has no meaning anymore.
 
Indeed, something tells me they don't wonder where the admiral is when someone references a flagship store, or flagship smartphone.
Yes, flagship is used to mean, “This is the essence of who we are, and the best we have to offer.”
 
Forget that Lower Decks is a cartoon. It's just silly. As a comedy show, one can overlook the glaring fact that nobody could ever act like Boimler and Mariner and survive. They'd have been killed in one episode. They'd never make it through Starfleet. They're unserious people, insubordinate to the core, and would have (actually have) caused serious destruction and injury.
Thing is, we know Starfleet has some disturbing lax standards when it comes to its personnel. Just look at how many Captains and Admirals end up renegades or downright evil. And these are officers among the highest ranks. With that in mind, is it really so hard to believe that officers of entry-level rank on one of the fleet's bottom rung starships are immature and unprofessional.

And let's not pretend Lower Decks style silliness never happened in the other Treks. Remember in TNG when an officer on the Enterprise died and Data discussed the matter while doing a goofy Sherlock Holmes impersonation? Is this the kind of "adult professional" behavior you want brought into the modern Treks?
we all know Ortegas would be dressed down by every Trek captain we've seen before the current era of Trek
Again I bring up the character Jack O'Neill from Stargate, a Colonel in the US Air Force who is routinely rude, sarcastic, and insubordinate to the point he once said to a General "If it weren't for me you'd currently have a snake in your head instead of your head up your ass" and got away with it. And according to one former USAF Chief of Staff, there are many actual Colonels who act exactly like O'Neill, and many more who are much worse.

According to Trek novel authors who have faced criticism for supposedly "unprofessional" Starfleet officers in their novels and who have themselves served in the military, in the military so long as a person is really good at their job, leeway is given with their personality. Mostly in recognition of the fact that they have a stressful job and if a snarky attitude and sarcastic one-liners help them deal with the stress, than that's a better alternative to having keep getting stressed out to the point they become miserable. It's not so much of a stretch to consider Starfleet would operate under a similar principle. With that in mind, we know Ortegas is damn good at her job, so it makes sense Pike gives her leeway in her personality.
 
In a Starfleet where Ron Tracey can psychologically fall apart so easily and become a threat to life and limb I can totally see Boimler and Mariner having Starfleet careers. We've just gone from a 23rd century Starfleet with poorly-screened out officers who have serious emotional health issues to a 24th century one where the class clowns and constant f-ups somehow manage to at least keep their commissions if not ever rapidly ascend up the ladder of rank and authority.
 
It was when he was having to expand ~30 minute episodes into entire books at that point. Blish never had to do that. Also, since it was The Counterclock Incident is was him doing everything he could to avoid writing about The Counterclock Incident. It takes up maybe a third of the book and is later revealed to have been an alien induced hallucination to see how gullible space faring people are. I may not have the details exact. But I think it's the only episode he entirely dismisses.

For “Log Seven”, ADF was able to adapt a spec script that he wrote for Roddenberry (on the off-chance that TOS would come back for a fourth live-action series, with GR back in charge). ADF had written and filed a two-parter featuring Kumara, now a captain, but previously a former roommate of Kirk’s when they were part of a Klingon exchange program.

I once asked ADF if he remembered that script’s title but, sadly, he no longer remembered and no longer has a copy of that script.
 
Indeed, something tells me they don't wonder where the admiral is when someone references a flagship store, or flagship smartphone.
Unless the stores are military or semi-military in nature the example is not apt.

And, when I did work in retail the flagship store was next to the corporate headquarters meaning executive leaders would be there regularly.

With that in mind, we know Ortegas is damn good at her job, so it makes sense Pike gives her leeway in her personality.
Damn straight.
 
I hope you feel better after that rant. Such rants don’t really achieve much.
:confused: What do you mean, “achieve”? This is the thread where we rate a specific episode of SNW. Agree with that poster's opinion or not (which I certainly don't), but he's doing exactly that in the place that's meant for that. Unless you want to say you only want to allow positive opinions here. Again, I personally find this opinion and specifically the way in which it is presented way over the top. But I still think there's essentially nothing wrong with voicing that here.
 
Last edited:
We've just gone from a 23rd century Starfleet with poorly-screened out officers
Something which is still going on in the 25th century. In season 3 of Picard we have Captain Shaw, an officer who everyone (even the villain) knows has been dealing with mental health issues for the past thirty years which he has done nothing to address. Yet he still made Captain and was given command of a starship.
 
:confused: What do you mean, “achieve”?… I still think there's essentially nothing wrong with voicing that here.

The OP is most welcome to an opinion, but ranting like that is hardly interesting reading, nor is it going to persuade others, or make the creators of SNW and LD do things differently.

Likewise, those of us who rated the episode a 10 are not going to convince the OP to like the episode.

It “achieves” very little.
 
The OP is most welcome to an opinion, but ranting like that is hardly interesting reading, nor is it going to persuade others, or make the creators of SNW and LD do things differently.

Likewise, those of us who rated the episode a 10 are not going to convince the OP to like the episode.

It “achieves” very little.
Respectfully, it wasn't a rant, it was just a negative review. It achieves exactly the same thing as a glowing one.
 
Something which is still going on in the 25th century. In season 3 of Picard we have Captain Shaw, an officer who everyone (even the villain) knows has been dealing with mental health issues for the past thirty years which he has done nothing to address. Yet he still made Captain and was given command of a starship.
To be fair, he probably hasn't had to deal with the Borg since his initial trauma. Picard and Seven being there brought it back up
 
Thing is, we know Starfleet has some disturbing lax standards when it comes to its personnel. Just look at how many Captains and Admirals end up renegades or downright evil. And these are officers among the highest ranks. With that in mind, is it really so hard to believe that officers of entry-level rank on one of the fleet's bottom rung starships are immature and unprofessional.

And let's not pretend Lower Decks style silliness never happened in the other Treks. Remember in TNG when an officer on the Enterprise died and Data discussed the matter while doing a goofy Sherlock Holmes impersonation? Is this the kind of "adult professional" behavior you want brought into the modern Treks?

Again I bring up the character Jack O'Neill from Stargate, a Colonel in the US Air Force who is routinely rude, sarcastic, and insubordinate to the point he once said to a General "If it weren't for me you'd currently have a snake in your head instead of your head up your ass" and got away with it. And according to one former USAF Chief of Staff, there are many actual Colonels who act exactly like O'Neill, and many more who are much worse.

According to Trek novel authors who have faced criticism for supposedly "unprofessional" Starfleet officers in their novels and who have themselves served in the military, in the military so long as a person is really good at their job, leeway is given with their personality. Mostly in recognition of the fact that they have a stressful job and if a snarky attitude and sarcastic one-liners help them deal with the stress, than that's a better alternative to having keep getting stressed out to the point they become miserable. It's not so much of a stretch to consider Starfleet would operate under a similar principle. With that in mind, we know Ortegas is damn good at her job, so it makes sense Pike gives her leeway in her personality.

I always think about this when I see the bullshit hoops Starfleet made poor Wesley Crusher jump through to get into the academy...no wonder they're all weird/evil/damaged...the academy intake process is Willy Wonka levels of fucked up!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top