Lets hope Paramount leaves as LONG AS THEY CAN I.D. in cinemas just to prove a point. After all it's the second best rated movie this summer (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/summer-movie-scorecard-2013/)
OK, you think it looks "cheap" because it was shot on Super 35 - I don't agree. All the movies I own shot on Super 35, including Titanic and Terminator 2, do not, IMHO, look any the worse for it either.A low budget doesn't necessarily correlate to a "cheap" appearance on screen.
Well..
I still think a lot of the "cheap" TV look from STVI is because it was filmed in Super 35.
What is it about Super 35 that makes it look "cheap" for you?
But Cinemascope's been dead as a format since...what...1967?...but I just think the depth of field is off compared to cinemascope.
I remember seeing examples in behind-the-scenes footage of cameras being shaken, but I can't recall anything which would have led me to think that the cameras suffered any damage as a result.Are movie cameras damaged when people shake them vigorously? The reason I ask this is because I saw a lot of this in the featurettes for the first film.
In 2012, a Brazilian film director used Cinemascope for his film.CinemaScope's association with anamorphic projection is still so embedded in mass consciousness that all anamorphic prints are now referred to generically as "'Scope" prints.
And then realize how bad JJ Trek is in comparison.
I read a good article on Superman Returns that had my feelings summed up, I really wish they'd made a franchise out of that movie.
I read a good article on Superman Returns that had my feelings summed up, I really wish they'd made a franchise out of that movie.
One thing that I liked about these new movies is the people and kids who may discover the original TV shows, TNG etc
And then realize how bad JJ Trek is in comparison.
One thing that I liked about these new movies is the people and kids who may discover the original TV shows, TNG etc
And then realize how bad JJ Trek is in comparison.
One thing that I liked about these new movies is the people and kids who may discover the original TV shows, TNG etc
And then realize how bad JJ Trek is in comparison.
![]()
![]()
![]()
"Yes!" - Data, Star Trek: Generations
Blashpemer...Turn in your Nerd Card and report for obligatory burning at your nearest Chapel of The RoddenberrySorry, ain't happenin' on this planet.
Why should I care whether JJTrek brings more fans to oldTrek? Star Trek is neither a religion nor an insurance pool.
^^^Blashpemer...Turn in your Nerd Card and report for obligatory burning at your nearest Chapel of The RoddenberrySorry, ain't happenin' on this planet.
Why should I care whether JJTrek brings more fans to oldTrek? Star Trek is neither a religion nor an insurance pool.![]()
We're all familiar with "The Tale of Boy Therin and Star Trek: The Motion Picture," thank you. In this forum alone, you must have told it more than a hundred times; I don't doubt that some here are now able to repeat it from memory and I hope that they're not also haunted by it when they sleep. Perhaps you'd be kind enough to give that story a rest for a bit?
As a then "newbie fan", people told me this about ST:TMP all through 1980 and 1981. <snip> Still love TMP!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.