Awww. I was hoping for "I'm writing a new Star Trek book!"
It's still neat. I notice that although she was pleased that Bad Robot used
Spock's World as a reference, she doesn't actually give her opinion of STXI

.
True, but it's the only version of Trek she didn't offer her opinion on.
Well personally while I would not be disinterested to know her opinion at the same time it also doesn't really matter to me. Frankly I don't know that I have ever truly changed my opinion about something based on someone elses, not unless I was undecided to begin with.
VERY nice...thanks!
She's absolutely right about the "golden era of the Trek novel." TOO much continuity can be a bad thing sometimes, if you ask me, and that's what was great about the old TOS novels.
I bet I have some idea about what novel she thought constituted barfing on a ream of paper, though, that inspired her to do better...
Personally I'm a continuity nut. I love it. The more the better. But to be sure if continuity minutiea gets in the way of a good story then out it goes.
I have to admit to being curious about the inciting novel myself. There is a lot of the really early stuff that well the kindest way I can put it is that it just doesn't work for me. On the other hand if there had not been that stuff to show that there was indeed an interest then probably there would not be the novels we have enjoyed over the years. I would submit that if there had been no Trek novels then media tie in novels as we know them today would probably not exist.
And, the two first Star Trek books I bought after being a fan (I've seen about 13 episodes of TNG and a few TOS episodes) was Spock's World och Carey's Final Frontier. Neither book really fitting for a newbie, I realized later..
hmm. I'm not entirely sure I agree. The thing is that unless you have been living in a cave, you probably have at least a rough idea of what Trek is and is about. And both SW and FF do a pretty good job as I recall (Spock's World is my bible but it's been a long time since I've read Final Frontier) of keeping the reader in the loop even if they've never really seen much Trek.
I remember the Irish scenes in Spock's World but I didn't know she lived in Ireland. You learn something every day.
Well scene really. And I would be curious to learn how that came about. I know she originally lived in the US as did her husband. I don't know for certain but at the time of her writing Spock's World I think she still did. So I'd love to know when she moved and why. (I have a fascination with people's reasons for making big moves like that)
Now, in Ishmael by Barbara Hambly, which is mainly an unauthorized crossover between Star Trek and Here Come the Brides,...
Um damn! Warn a guy next time huh? Isn't there a little "Do not be drinking anything while you read the following post" warning feature?
I have to admit that Spock's World and Dark Mirror are my two favorite DD novels. Personally it was because of DM that I had a hard time getting into DS9's revisiting of the MU. Although that's the great thing about paralell universes. There's no reason why they can't both be true.
I tried reading Intellivore and it just didn't work for me. And well honestly Spock's World is just so well perfect that nothing else of hers except for DM really matches up for me.
And this brings me to another point. Could TPTB pretty pretty please with honey and sugar on top stop comparing other novels to Spock's World? I know they mean it as a compliment and an inducement but honestly I usually despite trying not to wind up with expectations that are way to high and as a result always come away slightly disappointed in whatever the book is.