• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starship Insignia

That is quite an interesting perspective. I'd always figured that the different insignias represented different subdivisions of Starfleet -- i.e. each one was for a different group of ships under a shared command, rather than a single ship. This is the theory I used in my Rise of the Federation novels, in which I portray the early Federation Starfleet as a loose union of the founding worlds' individual fleets, kinda like the European Space Agency. I have the standard delta representing UESPA/Earth Starfleet (because its earliest chronological appearance is on the UESPA Friendship 1 probe launched in 2067), the Decker-style insignia representing the Andorian Guard, the Exeter insignia representing Alpha Centauri, and the "Charlie X" merchant marine "hoof" emblem representing the Tellarite space service (which actually does pretty much fill the role of a merchant marine, so that works out nicely). The Vulcans are represented by an IDIC patch, of course.

But there's no reason that system couldn't give way to something different in the interim between ROTF and the TOS/Discovery era. My intention was always that the separate fleets would eventually evolve into a more unified service and the insignias could evolve away from their national origins. So it could still end up becoming the system proposed in this article.

Of course, that leaves the anomaly of the Defiant uniforms in ENT: "In a Mirror, Darkly" bearing a different insignia than the one seen in "The Tholian Web" -- a chevron shape matching the one seen on the "racing stripes" on the side of the Enterprise engineering hull and nacelles, also sometimes seen as a wall hanging behind admirals on the viewscreen. That seems to be some kind of generalized Starfleet Command emblem, but it doesn't belong on starship crew uniforms under the scheme proposed here. But then, since it is a different insignia than the one in "Web," I tend to think that maybe it's the Defiant from a slightly different timeline, like the ones seen early in TNG: "Parallels" where everything was identical aside from a few minor details.
 
Nice.

The only thing I can think of off the top of my head that's not addressed is the odd person in the background who appears to be actually serving on Starbase 11 and who wears an arrowhead, (mainly) such as this person here seen in "The Menagerie":

http://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/1x11hd/themenageriepart1hd021.jpg
http://tos.trekcore.com/hd/thumbnails.php?album=12&page=1

My theory is that this person, evidently serving in the capacity of something like Mendez's secretary, should have been wearing a flower, but wasn't due to a costuming error.
 
Or she just transferred from ship duty to starbase support and hadn't changed the uniform yet. Probably some latitude of a grace period there between assignments.
 
Shrug. Ok, She’s pulling a month of CQ Duty at Starbase 11 while her ship lays over for a minor refit. You don’t change your uniform items for a TDY, or any other sort of temporary duty. I didn’t mention her as I didn’t think seeing her at a computer station or desk as being anything out of the ordinary. In fact as an Airman long ago, I was tasked with administrative duty for a month at HQ to familiarize myself with additional duties. It’s a thing that happens in service allllllllll the time. It’s funny to me that civilians will so very often draw contrary conclusions from things that someone serving in uniform just understands or takes for granted. As for Commodore Mendez’ assistant, that’s Miss. Piper.
 
Last edited:

Thanks for writing this!

I do have to quibble, though - the Roddenberry papers are the University of California Los Angeles, not Irvine. And, officially, none of the collection has been digitized. The transcription you’ve included is one I made years ago - unfortunately, with a typo (“carven” instead of “craven”) that I accidentally introduced.

PM me if you’d like to see the original document.
 
Great catch sir! The attribution to UCI was an edit by my design partner that I meant to circle back around and correct. I simply forgot. It happens, that piece was a bear to write and edit, and went through a lot of revisions. As for the original memo we concede in the piece that it was a transcription (I was indeed tempted to correct the craven typo, but that’s how the transcription was so that’s how we presented it).

That being said I’d LOVE to see the original document. I’m kinda crazy when it comes to documentation and would of course appreciate seeing it.

John
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top