Maybe in your opinion.Yes it is.
Maybe in your opinion.Yes it is.
Eaves is a TOS fan from way back; he knows his shit. I'm 100% sure that if it were up to his tastes alone, he'd probably design something more Matt Jeffries-looking. But it's not -- he's hired to deliver the particular aesthetic the producers want.
They're just not a design aesthetic you subjectively prefer.
For Starfleet ships? Well, obviously your mileage may vary, but I don't tend to think it's a fair comparison, since PIC is not about Starfleet and only introduced a new class briefly in the season finale, and since we're comparing a show that lasted seven seasons to a show that's only had one season so far.
I flat-out reject the assertion that TNG did better starship porn than DIS. Setting aside my subjective preference that TOS-era ships have a retro-futurist aesthetic, those ships are gorgeous. Eaves clearly made an effort to give them unique profiles that stand out from a distance; they have a sense of weight and size, and they all look like they have distinct mission profiles. DIS does damn good starship porn.
Yeah, in the Booklet for the Eaglemoss DSC Enterprise model, Eaves said he was afraid they'd ask him to get rid of the round nacelles for the Connie redesign. He was relived when they said he didn't.Eaves is a TOS fan from way back; he knows his shit. I'm 100% sure that if it were up to his tastes alone, he'd probably design something more Matt Jeffries-looking. But it's not -- he's hired to deliver the particular aesthetic the producers want.
Maybe in your opinion.
Again that's your opinion.To give two examples, The Mandalorian or Star Wars Rebels honours the legacy of Star Wars. It's clear as day. Lovingly crafted tv shows.
Picard only honours the legacy of Star Trek that Chabon likes. And that doesn't include ship porn because he himself isn't interested in it.
So yes, selfish.
Really, because none of his ships since long before Discovery or Picard resemble Matt Jeffries' designs.
The vitriol against PIC and DSC continues to amaze me, but this one takes the cake. Pulling apart so short a scene just blows my mind.
That's highly subjective. I remember the space battles from DSC way more than TNG, First Contact or VOY. Only DS9 kind of stands out, but that was the culmination of a huge long arc. Again, context.But you hardly see any of them. 95% of Discovery's first season takes place on the ship. And even when there are Starfleet ships on screen, they hardly stand out or make any impact whatsoever because of the poor cinematography. Same with Picard, ignore the ugly geometry on the Copy Paste Class, the actual angles and ultra wide field of view used in the episode barely left any impression. Compare it to the fan edit video I posted on the previous page. THAT is how you do ship porn. Even TNG did it better.
Yes, I do wonder. Because there is no love, no kindness, no grace behind the critique. It's just hate for hate's sake and then demanding it be done another way or else its not proper.You're in a thread called "Starship design in Star Trek Picard" and you're wondering why people in here take it so seriously?
No one is saying Picard is ruined because of that one scene or that one scene ruined their childhood. They're just saying it was disappointing given they'd waited so long to see starships in this series.
Nope, it's a great NX-Era version of it.That's an Eaves bastardisation of a classic and beautiful Jeffries design.
Just like the original.unbalanced geometry (look how heavy the secondary hull is compared to the saucer, side on)
I remember the space battles from DSC
What I am against is starship porn for starship porn's sake, which is what that fan edit is. It's not proper-it's fan opinion and wouldn't fit the context of the scene in Picard. Context matters.
Yes, I do wonder. Because there is no love, no kindness, no grace behind the critique. It's just hate for hate's sake and then demanding it be done another way or else its not proper.
We had starships in this series. But, it wasn't about the starships. And that's the point that keeps getting missed over and over and over again.
Nope, it's a great NX-Era version of it.
Well, I do. Different strokes, etc, etc.Really? I don't remember anything from the pilot. I remember the season 2 finale, but only because of how ludicrous and juvenile the pew pew action was.
What ships would be available to Starfleet to use after the losses suffered over the years.What context? Starfleet ships come in to save the day. That's literally it.
Cool. It's nice to see praise every once in a while when things are being torn apart for being "improper."Picard does plenty right, the characters are good, the pacing is good, loads of individual scenes were excellent. One aspect that adds up to maybe 60 seconds of screen time was extremely substandard in a franchise that does it so well. It's ok to call attention to that, it's ok to admit whilst praising other aspects of the show.
It is an aspect but it isn't the aspect. It's not "screw those fans." It is simply a recognition of the type of story being told is all. It would be like complaining there isn't enough starships in "City on the Edge of Forever" or "The Inner Light." Those stories are not focused on the ship elements. Picard wasn't focused on the ship elements.What does "it isn't about starships" mean? It's an aspect of the universe these stories are being told in and of huge significance to lots of fans. So "screw those fans" just because Chabon doesn't like ships?
It really doesn't. It has all the staples of one. Saucer, round nacelles, round hull.Your image proves that.
there is not a "proper way."
What ships would be available to Starfleet to use after the losses suffered over the years.
It is an aspect but it isn't the aspect.
It would be like complaining there isn't enough starships in "City on the Edge of Forever" or "The Inner Light."
It really doesn't. It has all the staples of one. Saucer, round nacelles, round hull.
An unreasonable expectation given the nature of the story.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.