That was my first thought. That they were the goggles Ray wears in the first movie when they first spot Slimer in the ballroom of the hotel.
The Ecto Goggles from Ghostbusters were based on an old model of night vision goggles, the ones in Jurassic Park were yellow and green and looked more like they were designed by Apple. He has a great collection of props and graphic novels, that model of the Titan is stunning too!
This ship is truely a beauty. It looks so much better than in the trailers. I like it. I want this replica.
I think it’s a beautiful ship as well! It’s just taken me some time to get over the feeling that it belongs to a different era lol
Well I like the ship that it was based off of, Bill Krause's Shangri-la. So I suppose I like this ship too, since it's basically the exact same ship only with updated nacelles.
I'm getting used to it. In a way similar to how the NX and Akira classes are more than 200 years apart but share similar design echoes or even the same hull features I just look at this as the 2390s/2400s design homage to the Constitution class Refit of over a century earlier.
And most Federation starships take their design cues from the NX-class. A full saucer as a primary hull. Two warp nacelles.
My point is that making a statement like "history has deep meaning to Starfleet" is ultimately meaningless, because Starfleet is a fictional organization whose values are prone to change at a whim by whatever writer, producer, showrunner, etc. decides to make them.
And as I mentioned above, your meaning is meaningless, because you are not the one in control of the values of Starfleet.
We can infer meaning based on certain clues, especially clues that tend to happen rather frequently. But in the end it's ultimately pointless, because this is all fake and some new person can come along and completely invalidate it all if they wanted to.