Starship design history in light of Discovery

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by INACTIVEUSS Einstein, Nov 18, 2017.

  1. bryce

    bryce Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Was that show runner Bryan Fuller then?

    Weird, I wonder what his issues where? I never understand - and the goes back to both Enterprise and the first 2 Kelvinverse movies - when somebody says "I want to make a new Star Trek...but I don't want it to be too...you know...Star Trek-y."

    Fine, then make something else!
     
    Rahul likes this.
  2. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Yes he was the original show runnner and creator

    Eh? How was Enterprise not star trek-y? It has everything that makes any series star trek.

    Same with Discovery.
     
  3. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Well, to me, ENT seemed very little like a prequel to TOS and much more like Voyager, just with a different ship and a different crew. The different time period seemed irrelevant, as the production values were exactly the same. Nothing in ENT felt in any way “primitive,” as Spock described the era in Balance of Terror.
     
    bryce, F. King Daniel and Ronald Held like this.
  4. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Go Lick The World!
    IIRC, Nick Meyer and Rod Roddenberry were also initially involved, but I think that changed pretty early on. If they stayed and asserted themselves in the project, we may have had a more cohesive series of design decisions than what we got. I was never a big fan of a lot of Fuller's choices, particularly when it came to Klingon design and starship design (for both SF and Klingons). Change for the sake of change without serving the plot in any meaningful way (which is all it really seemed to be) is problematic from square-zero, leading the show runners to try to ret-ret-con everything come season 2, which was an occasional needless distraction.
     
    Nenya likes this.
  5. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    I can sort of understand the necessity of changing the Klingon look so drastically in order to hide the fact that one actor was playing dual roles, but the ship designs were just over the top.
     
    137th Gebirg likes this.
  6. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    I don't if fully ignoring was the best choice, but I love the diversity of the design.
    I am less a fan of that but can get onboard with many of the ship designs.

    Variety is the spice of life.
     
  7. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Which I guess would have been fine if the stories made something out of that over-the-topness. Yeah, we did learn that these multiple Houses are competing there, but the Byzantine spectrum of ships could have been used to better portray the Byzantine structure of the Klingon society - with a voice of reason ultimately perhaps emerging and introducing a duller look. Instead, we never even got as much as a direct association between a given ship design and a given House.

    Quite the pity: the best-looking and best-fighting of the bunch, the regal Qogh, could easily have been declared a House of Kor design, and with that House falling hard, the design could then disappear and give way to those fairly conventional two-nacellers from House X. And then to their successor the D7, not (yet!) covered in proud Household greeblies...

    Timo Saloniemi
     
    Spaceship Jo likes this.
  8. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Go Lick The World!
    Agreed, particularly the Daspu class - roughly translated to "The Great Dildo of Kahless".
     
  9. DaveyNY

    DaveyNY Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Location:
    DaveyNY from Skin-Neck-Ta-Dee (Schenectady)
    Only Klingons would make an Adult Pleasuring Toy out of Porcupine Quills and Saw Blades.

    I guess one could assume that "Day-Spew" would be the recipients reaction upon insertion.
    :crazy:
    :devil:
    :whistle:
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2019
    cooleddie74 and 137th Gebirg like this.
  10. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    Well there was that time I got drunk on shots of Fireball...

    :shrug:
     
  11. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Go Lick The World!
    And you’re not blind? Most impressive.
     
  12. cooleddie74

    cooleddie74 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Location:
    The Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
    One does not question complimentary shots of Fireball at about 1 in the morning.

    And it helps I also had lots of hard cider and food beforehand. I was drunk...but not blind drunk and about to black out.
     
    137th Gebirg likes this.
  13. gerbil

    gerbil Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2001
    Location:
    USA
    In a way it makes sense. The round nacelle idea isn’t built on much from the TOS era. Even in Enterprise there was a variety of nacelle designs.

    Since TOS, the refit has squared nacelles. The Excelsior has squared nacelles. The Oberth has nacelles that are squared and built into the primary hull.

    In a post-scarcity universe it would make total sense for there to be more than one type of warp system, starship designers, and building contractors.

    As for the Klingon ships, they kind of messed with my head canon that “D7” was just a Starfleet design for a ship type or class that transferred from design to design. But I still kind of hold on to it, too.
     
    drt, Tuskin38 and fireproof78 like this.
  14. drt

    drt Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2013
    The round nacelle idea probably started when the TOS producers glued AMT nacelles on the Tholian ship to make the Aurora model for "The Way to Eden", with the TAS essentially doing similar with the cargo ships in "More Tribbles". However, I think a big influence was probably the Franz Joseph Technical Manual, which just swapped parts around because at it's heart it was intended to let fans make new ships from the existing AMT kit with minimum scratchbuilding.

    A lot of the new ships in the era of physical models reused parts of existing ships, presumably because it was more cost effective for the productions to use existing assets (molds and commercially available model kits), once the ships went CGI, almost every ship had custom nacelles and the idea of consistent designs for a particular era kind of went out the window. Except, ironically, for ST2009 which applied the technical manual ethos to the ships of the Vulcan rescue fleet.
     
    gerbil likes this.
  15. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    TNG seemed to have a common nacelle design, but when you get to the movies/DS9, then they start getting unique designs on every new class.
     
  16. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Hmm? TNG only had one starship. That, and the three different nacelles inherited from the TOS movies - Oberth, Excelsior and Miranda. And then a fourth added with the E-C.

    Unless you count the "BoBW" kitbashes, but those had at least two distinct nacelle designs - the marker pens in addition to the E-D kit bits.

    Basically, we could argue each nacelle design is specific to a decade, or to a registry range. Or then we could say Starfleet always chooses at least two suppliers for a given time.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  17. drt

    drt Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2013
    There’s also the Nebula class, but I guess it did start as a BoBW kitbash as well, before becoming a 1701-D 4-foot model mold kitbash.
     
  18. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    And don’t forget that the TOS shuttlecraft has nacelles too, which even now are debatable as to whether they were warp-capable. Nevertheless, they were the exact same design as a Constitution class ship’s (and weren’t the sole property of the Enterprise either, with craft assigned to starbases and deep space stations.)

    So it’s not just a matter of the Constitution class ships having round nacelles only in TOS.
     
    Spaceship Jo, Ronald Held and Rahul like this.
  19. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2019
    DaveyNY and 137th Gebirg like this.
  20. Ar-Pharazon

    Ar-Pharazon Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Location:
    Far North Chicago Suburbs
    From that comparison, I can start seeing the resemblance. Amazed that I could see the Ptolemy so clearly at first. I guess I wanted it to be closer than it really is, but should have known they wouldn't pay royalties for it.