darkwing_duck1
Vice Admiral
^No doubt...I wonder if somehow Triox Compound was involved.
Their absence during TOS would be rather easily explained even if they weren't a post-TOS invention. As said, they are used in emergencies, often within Class M environments, while "conventional spacewalks" are not really seen in TAS. TOS in turn shows "conventional spacewalks" in vacuum or in hostile atmosphere, rightly with the help of full spacesuits, but IIRC only two situations where obvious environmental hazards are braved: "Naked Time" (where some sort of thermal protection wear is seen) and "Squire of Gothos" (where we see breathing masks). That our heroes failed to use life support belts there is probably not crucial: the belts might be what one grabs when an excursion is unplanned, whereas orange coveralls and hood are more comfortable to wear in the long term and the garment of choice when one knows one's going to do subzero for the next hour.Ah yes, how do we explain the lack of use of the life support belt after TAS without removing TAS from canon?
Ah yes, how do we explain the lack of use of the life support belt after TAS without removing TAS from canon?
I'm gonna go with it being discovered not long after introduction that it had the nasty habit of causing some nasty health issue after prolonged use. Thus the technology was shelved.
The thing is, it can. Without the cooperation of potentially delicate, power-consuming equipment, a spacesuit will kill you; total reliance on machinery is there just as much as with forcefield-based solutions.Also, a suit can't "short out" on you.
The thing is, it can. Without the cooperation of potentially delicate, power-consuming equipment, a spacesuit will kill you; total reliance on machinery is there just as much as with forcefield-based solutions.Also, a suit can't "short out" on you.
Furthermore, a suit can be torn, at least theoretically; a forcefield cannot, at least theoretically. A suit has joints and seals; a forcefield doesn't. A suit poses limitations on reach, visibility and access; a forcefield apparently doesn't.
Overall, the life support belt might be the significantly more reliable choice out of the two.
The life support belt didn't fail our TAS heroes. One wonders how it could have failed somebody else, and thus been declared a failure.
Or was use of the belt the reason our heroes looked a decade older than they should in ST:TMP?![]()
...suit tech is safer than field tech because there is a physical item that may still be of use despite losing power.
Since the tech went away and was never seen again, I would say that the fact is that it wasn't.
There is absolutely no justification for such an assumption.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.