You sit down and watch TOS (particularly in the first season) you can see tat Starfleet is very much meant to be the military. There's just no other way to intrepret it. The whole "Starfleet isn't military" thing that ahs existed since TNG is just stupid. Surely the Federation needs some sort of dedicated armed force for defensive purposes? So where are they. How come they're never around when the Borg or the Dominion attack? Why is defending the Federation from these threats left to the Not-A-Military Starfleet?
The article is an entertaining read even if it's just stuff I've seen bitched about constantly over the years on this very forum. Still, the "things change over 300 years. Doesn't work as an excuse at all. Now in regards to the points they make:
1) Seriously, if you live near a navy dockyard, you'll likely notice more than one boat there at any given time. So it does seem odd that there is only one starship within the Sol system.
2) This is a good point. If Starfleet feared Picard was a liability, why didn't they just relieve him, give command to Riker and let the Enterprise go into battle? Technically, it was Riker who defeated the Borg last time anyway.
3) I can not imagine things changing significantly enough within the next two hundred years that a third year cadet can skip seven ranks and take command of the flagship. Seriously, is there no one qualified in Starfleet that you have to turn to a cadet?
4) Wesley's "Acting Ensign" status could have been easy to accept if he were just helping out, like we saw him occasionally doing in engineering with Geordi and Data. Having him piloting the ship and at one point giving orders to actual officers is something I can not see happening.
5) Yeah, Starfleet being officers only is odd. Sadly, the attempts to introduce enlisted personnel was sloppily handled, but I guess that's better than no attempt at all.
6) I have no comment to make about the Prime Directive.
7) I thought the Enterprise A was a renamed USS Yorktown?
The article is an entertaining read even if it's just stuff I've seen bitched about constantly over the years on this very forum. Still, the "things change over 300 years. Doesn't work as an excuse at all. Now in regards to the points they make:
1) Seriously, if you live near a navy dockyard, you'll likely notice more than one boat there at any given time. So it does seem odd that there is only one starship within the Sol system.
2) This is a good point. If Starfleet feared Picard was a liability, why didn't they just relieve him, give command to Riker and let the Enterprise go into battle? Technically, it was Riker who defeated the Borg last time anyway.
3) I can not imagine things changing significantly enough within the next two hundred years that a third year cadet can skip seven ranks and take command of the flagship. Seriously, is there no one qualified in Starfleet that you have to turn to a cadet?
4) Wesley's "Acting Ensign" status could have been easy to accept if he were just helping out, like we saw him occasionally doing in engineering with Geordi and Data. Having him piloting the ship and at one point giving orders to actual officers is something I can not see happening.
5) Yeah, Starfleet being officers only is odd. Sadly, the attempts to introduce enlisted personnel was sloppily handled, but I guess that's better than no attempt at all.
6) I have no comment to make about the Prime Directive.
7) I thought the Enterprise A was a renamed USS Yorktown?