• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Starfleet Academy Coming to P+

Look, the Star Trek fanbase is enormous, and we all have our own opinions. But that doesn't mean we can't call ourselves "fans" just because we're part of a campaign trying to make a difference. Yeah, we might be a bit preachy at times, but it's only because we care so much about preserving what makes Star Trek great!

“Make Star Trek Great Again!”

Yeah, you might want to rethink how you come off with your rhetoric.
 
Sneak peak of my next blog post

Starfleet Academy Spinoff: A Storm is Brewing Over Discovery's Worst-Rated Episode

The upcoming Star Trek: Starfleet Academy show has already sparked a wave of controversy and heated debates among fans. Set to be a spinoff of Star Trek: Discovery's poorly received episode S04E04 "All is Possible," the series has left fans questioning the direction the franchise is taking. As the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign gains traction, Twitter users are losing their cool, with many criticizing the new show set in the 32nd century.

"All is Possible," the foundation for the Starfleet Academy spinoff, has been widely criticized for its lackluster plot and superficial exploration of the core Star Trek values. The episode is a far cry from the thought-provoking storytelling that has defined the franchise for decades. Fans are left wondering how a show based on such a weak foundation can hope to capture the essence of Star Trek.

Adding fuel to the fire, the announcement of Noga Landau as one of the showrunners has intensified fans' concerns. Known for her work on the Syfy series "The Magicians" and the CW's "Nancy Drew," Landau's writing style has been described as catering to special interests at best. With a resume that lacks the experience and expertise required to handle the complexities of the Star Trek universe, fans fear that Landau's involvement could further dilute the franchise's legacy.

The storm is forming, and the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign is at the forefront, fighting to preserve the integrity of the Star Trek universe. As fans unite to voice their concerns and demand a return to the core values that have made Star Trek a beloved and enduring franchise, the future of the Starfleet Academy spinoff remains uncertain.

The question on everyone's mind is whether the showrunners and CBS will heed the warnings of the fans and steer the Starfleet Academy series back on course, or if they will continue down a path that risks alienating the very audience that has supported Star Trek for generations. Only time will tell, but one thing is for certain: the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign will not back down in its quest to protect the Star Trek legacy.

Join the movement and let your voice be heard. It's time to stand up for the Star Trek we know and love.

Modest suggested revisions to the text:

The new StopLuveStupis campaign has so far been met with indifference and ridicule among fans. Created in objection to the Star Fleet Academy spinoff of Paramount+'s Star Trek: Discovery, the campaign has left fans wondering just why the hell anyone would take these shows so seriously. As the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign thus far fails to arouse any fan interest whatever, Twitter users continue to ignore it entirely, with the exception of one or two who take a few moments to mock it.

"All is Possible," which introduced the premise for the Starfleet Academy spinoff, was a single episode of a television series which provides no realistic indication of what such a series may be like. All experience suggests that some episodes of the new show will be better than others and that it will remain largely within the half-century Trek tradition of espousing humane values, albeit in often superficial, feel-good ways.

The announcement of Noga Landau as one of the showrunners has met with similar disinterest from fans. Most people who watch and enjoy Trek have only a passing awareness, if any, of the writers, directors and other off-camera production personnel. Having worked on Star Trek: Discovery does suggest that Landau is familiar enough with the franchise to carry on the traditions of reassuring repetition that have marked the property for decades.

No one really cares that the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign exists, or is impressed with its grandiose manifesto. As fans go on with their daily lives, an indefinite number do chatter away on message boards and social media, wondering idly which Trek actors from previous shows will either feature or cameo in the new series, often suggesting unnecessarily complicated scenarios involving time travel, parallel universes and cloning. Jeffery Alan Combs is mentioned occasionally, as is, inexplicably, Nicholas Meyer.

The question on everyone's mind is why anyone would conceive and attempt to mount an online campaign to kill a future TV series based on a brief press release that provides no real information on setting, cast, budget or creative direction. Only time will tell, but one thing is for certain: the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign is not going to make a dime's worth of difference to executives at Paramount+.

Either watch the show or don't. Life is too short to work yourself up about a damn TV show you know nothing much about yet.
 
Last edited:
Modest suggested revisions to the text:

The new StopLuveStupis campaign has so far been met with indifference and ridicule among fans. Created in objection to the Star Fleet Academy spinoff of Paramount+'s Star Trek: Discovery, the campaign has left fans wondering just why the hell anyone would take these shows so seriously. As the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign thus far fails to arouse any fan interest whatever, Twitter users continue to ignore it entirely, with the exception of one or two who take a few moments to mock it.

"All is Possible," which introduced the premise for the Starfleet Academy spinoff, was a single episode of a television series which provides no realistic indication of what such a series may be like. All experience suggests that some episodes of the new show will be better than others and that it will remain largely within the half-century Trek tradition of espousing humane values, albeit in often superficial, feel-good ways.

The announcement of Noga Landau as one of the showrunners has met with similar disinterest from fans. Most people who watch and enjoy Trek have only a passing awareness, if any, of the writers, directors and other off-camera production personnel. Having worked on Star Trek: Discovery does suggest that Landau is familiar enough with the franchise to carry on the traditions of reassuring repetition that have marked the property for decades.

No one really cares that the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign exists, or is impressed with its grandiose manifesto. As fans go on with their daily lives, an indefinite number do chatter away on message boards and social media, wondering idly which Trek actors from previous shows will either feature or cameo in the new series, often suggesting unnecessarily complicated scenarios involving time travel, parallel universes and cloning. Jeffery Alan Combs is mentioned occasionally, as is, inexplicably, Nicholas Meyer.

The question on everyone's mind is why anyone would conceive and attempt to mount an online campaign to kill a future TV series based on a brief press release that provides no real information on setting, cast, budget or creative direction. Only time will tell, but one thing is for certain: the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign is not going to make a dime's worth of difference to executives at Paramount+.

Either watch the show or don't. Life is too short to work yourself up about a damn TV show you know nothing much about yet.
Outstanding. :lol:
 
Geez, seriously? Here's the deal: when we say "fans" in relation to the #StopLuveStupis campaign, it's because we ARE fans! We're a group of passionate Star Trek lovers who have genuine concerns about the franchise. So what if not everyone agrees? That's life! We don't have to tiptoe around the fact that we're fans just because not everyone shares our views.

Look, the Star Trek fanbase is enormous, and we all have our own opinions. But that doesn't mean we can't call ourselves "fans" just because we're part of a campaign trying to make a difference. Yeah, we might be a bit preachy at times, but it's only because we care so much about preserving what makes Star Trek great!

So, to anyone who's got a problem with us using the term "fans": get over it! We're allowed to have opinions and stand up for what we believe in. And if you don't like it, well, that's too bad. Stop Luve Stupis ain’t going anywhere!

You don't have the 'right' to determine what "makes Star Trek great". You also don't have the 'right' to act like labeling yourself a 'fan' gives you carte blanche to engage in ridiculous behavior without other people calling you out for said behavior.

You want to tell other Trek fans to "deal with" the fact that you're misappropriating that term (fan) as if it gives you some level of justification for your ridiculous, futile, and solitary attempt to pick a fight with the rights holders of Star Trek? Why don't you "deal with" the fact that this Starfleet Academy series is happening and there's absolutely nothing you can do about it.
 
Geez, seriously? Here's the deal: when we say "fans" in relation to the #StopLuveStupis campaign, it's because we ARE fans! We're a group of passionate Star Trek lovers who have genuine concerns about the franchise. So what if not everyone agrees? That's life! We don't have to tiptoe around the fact that we're fans just because not everyone shares our views.

Look, the Star Trek fanbase is enormous, and we all have our own opinions. But that doesn't mean we can't call ourselves "fans" just because we're part of a campaign trying to make a difference. Yeah, we might be a bit preachy at times, but it's only because we care so much about preserving what makes Star Trek great!

So, to anyone who's got a problem with us using the term "fans": get over it! We're allowed to have opinions and stand up for what we believe in. And if you don't like it, well, that's too bad. Stop Luve Stupis ain’t going anywhere!

Social Media hype buildup needs time. This is especially valid for new accounts which are usually shadowbanned for a lot of activities. All these issues will resolve by themselves, once new account sanctions are lifted. I am in the process of hiring a social media manager who will support me with the proper configuration of my accounts.

Two slips of latinum the chances are TPTB won't even know about this.
 
You've come up with a definition of 'fans' that excludes virtually everyone on this Star Trek forum.
This is the part that makes me the most sad. By declaring something "not Trek" and other similar rhetoric it claims a level of exclusivity that would push other fans out. It misses the point of a franchise that espouses diversity of opinion and points of view by claiming there is only one right way to do Star Trek. And that's something I see repeated over and over again from fans. And it's frustrating and makes me sad.

Reminds me of Frank Burns from MASH:
Blake: What about individuality?
Burns: Well individuality is fine as long as we all do it together.
 
First time the Trek fandom has reacted to a new live-action Trek series announcement with a resounding "u-hu, ok"

That's because the idea is so old, it feels as innovative as a new "CSI: another city" spin-off.

Biggest mistake is setting it in the 32nd century. That setting has nothing to do with familiar Trek - doesn't look like it, doesn't feel like it, different technology, different world-building (where are the Klingons?), and most of all - entirely different Starfleet.

Sneak peak of my next blog post

Starfleet Academy Spinoff: A Storm is Brewing Over Discovery's Worst-Rated Episode

The upcoming Star Trek: Starfleet Academy show has already sparked a wave of controversy and heated debates among fans. Set to be a spinoff of Star Trek: Discovery's poorly received episode S04E04 "All is Possible," the series has left fans questioning the direction the franchise is taking. As the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign gains traction, Twitter users are losing their cool, with many criticizing the new show set in the 32nd century.

"All is Possible," the foundation for the Starfleet Academy spinoff, has been widely criticized for its lackluster plot and superficial exploration of the core Star Trek values. The episode is a far cry from the thought-provoking storytelling that has defined the franchise for decades. Fans are left wondering how a show based on such a weak foundation can hope to capture the essence of Star Trek.

Adding fuel to the fire, the announcement of Noga Landau as one of the showrunners has intensified fans' concerns. Known for her work on the Syfy series "The Magicians" and the CW's "Nancy Drew," Landau's writing style has been described as catering to special interests at best. With a resume that lacks the experience and expertise required to handle the complexities of the Star Trek universe, fans fear that Landau's involvement could further dilute the franchise's legacy.

The storm is forming, and the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign is at the forefront, fighting to preserve the integrity of the Star Trek universe. As fans unite to voice their concerns and demand a return to the core values that have made Star Trek a beloved and enduring franchise, the future of the Starfleet Academy spinoff remains uncertain.

The question on everyone's mind is whether the showrunners and CBS will heed the warnings of the fans and steer the Starfleet Academy series back on course, or if they will continue down a path that risks alienating the very audience that has supported Star Trek for generations. Only time will tell, but one thing is for certain: the "Stop Luve Stupis" campaign will not back down in its quest to protect the Star Trek legacy.

Join the movement and let your voice be heard. It's time to stand up for the Star Trek we know and love.
Is this satire?
 
Biggest mistake is setting it in the 32nd century. That setting has nothing to do with familiar Trek - doesn't look like it, doesn't feel like it, different technology, different world-building (where are the Klingons?), and most of all - entirely different Starfleet.
Yes, yes please! Please be fucking different! Stop with the stale leftovers of Trek that people find comforting.
 
Biggest mistake is setting it in the 32nd century. That setting has nothing to do with familiar Trek - doesn't look like it, doesn't feel like it, different technology, different world-building (where are the Klingons?), and most of all - entirely different Starfleet.

Creating Star Trek that doesn't look or feel like any other iteration of the IP isn't a mistake.
 
These are features, not bugs.
Then why make it Star Trek? (Apart from the obvious commercial reasoning).

The idea should be a new angle within an established universe.

If I make a show called "Star Wars: Bounty Hunters" I'd expect it be a new angle (bounty hunters) within the familiar Star Wars universe.
It would be weird if it instead were a "Dog -the Bounty Hunter" spin-off that is bookended by two droids talking about a remote planet in the far future in another galaxy.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top