• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starfighters in Star Trek ?

Sure, you could use fighters as picket ships, scouts, and raiders, similar to how the Maquis seemed to operate. Break contact and run as soon as something bigger comes along. Generally in Trek the larger ships have a higher maximum warp speed and longer endurance, so pursuits are not going to favor starfighters.

Also there are not a lot of strategically relevant points in deep space. In 'The Phoenix' a weapons range of nearly 200,000km is stated. So a single starship or station(or defensive satellite) mounted weapon array can cover a lot of area. You'd only need a couple arrays to cover a planet, less for a moon or station. Commerce raiding? You'd force the enemy to adopt convoy tactics, but only a single decent sized escort would be needed unless you plan on using overwhelming numbers of fighters.

Look at the 'Blue' water navies of the present, how many of them operate significant numbers of surface combatants that are smaller than corvette size? Few, very few, and they generally have specialized roles. Deep space is very, very far from any coasts.

In space, there are no disadvantages to size, gravity, inertia, mass, draft, none of that matter much anymore so larger ships would have even more advantages in the Trek universe than say a Arleigh Burke-class destroyer v. some 50-foot patrol boat in the present.
 
This subject has been hashed over several times over in the Trek Tech forum. The consensus usually winds up the same, technically very easy, but tactically, not so much. Definitely not in the conventional way we think of fighters, ala Star Wars, Babylon 5, and any number of World War II movies.

Something closer to PT boats seems more likely.
 
This subject has been hashed over several times over in the Trek Tech forum. The consensus usually winds up the same, technically very easy, but tactically, not so much.
What consensus? The consensus in the last thread that discussed this was that there was no real consensus, and I'm not just speaking of myself.

As I recall, in the last thread that discussed this someone put forth some novel ideas, very un-Star Wars and un-Star Trek like, about dirt runways on lonely outposts. Actually, many participants found that idea particularly interesting.

Also, your opinion here doesn't really address why runabouts are so often tactically effective, why the Delta Flyer was viable, and why there are so many ships called "fighters" in TNG and DS9.
 
I only read the first three pages (before Indistinguishable From Magic arrived in the post), but Double Helix #3: Red Sector features a Starfleet fighter pilot named Stiles. He's flying a fighter in formation at the start.
 
Call me crazy but I think a better question would be whether it would make sense from a VIEWER perspective. I think Starfighters wouldn't feel very Star Trek-ish.
 
Yeah. In my mind, starfighters are pretty much why I don't like seeing dedicated warships in Star Trek. Starfighters are even worse, when you think about them. War is great to watch in Star Trek because it's a FAILURE of what Star Trek is about and seeing people cope with that is important. However, I wouldn't want to see the failure of the Federation making large scale preparations for war as part of their daily day-to-day business.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top