• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Wars: Legacy of the Force opinions

I stopped reading the Star Wars novels about 5 years ago, just after the book where they find the living planet was published. I happened to read the Wookieepedia entry on Legacy of the Force and was pretty horrified... worse, the entries on Star Wars: Legacy, which reveal that everything falls completely apart within 100 years.
Legacy is actually pretty good, because the authors understand things like character and plot movement.
yeah, what I've read is pretty good actually, but I'm deeply bothered that it takes place so soon after the founding of the New Republic. the current time frame means some of the kids and grandkids live to see the downfall. it'd be much better if it took place at least 300 years later.
 
The creators said that there was a good reason why Legacy took place so closely to the movies and post-ROTJ EU, but frankly, after that reason was revealed, I don't really think it was a good enough one to justify the decision.
 
What was it? I don't recall hearing mention of it before.

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman

A'Sharad Hett could only live for a finite time, so that's one possible reason. Another could have something to do with the Vong references.

The Empire itself only lasted 25 years as the major power in the galaxy. The New Republic lasted about as long before it became the Galactic Alliance. The era of the Galactic Civil War and shortly thereafter is a time of major upheaval. It would be nice for there to be another long era of relative peace in the future, but that makes for a pretty limited EU. If it makes you feel better, just consider Legacy a terrific ongoing Infinities story.
 
What was it? I don't recall hearing mention of it before.

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
A'Sharad Hett could only live for a finite time, so that's one possible reason. Another could have something to do with the Vong references.
That's it. Well, the first one, anyway. At least, I think that's the "reason" they gave for the story's setting. There might be something else that they haven't revealed yet, which I admit is entirely possible. But if that's the only reason, it's a pretty weak one, if you ask me.
 
^ Yeah, I have to agree. I'd like to see a Galactic government that last more than a quarter-century. But accepting that I probably won't as long as the Powers That Be want to sell more novels/comics, Legacy is a pretty dang good way to go about tearing things up.
 
^ Yeah, I have to agree. I'd like to see a Galactic government that last more than a quarter-century. But accepting that I probably won't as long as the Powers That Be want to sell more novels/comics, Legacy is a pretty dang good way to go about tearing things up.

We do. The GFFA lasts for around 100 years before it falls.

I thought LotF was okay. Didn't much care for the Boba Fett parts, I've never been a big fan of Fett. The series did see the return of one of my favourite characters, one that is less then popular if the theforce.net forums are any indication.
 
I liked the Mandalorian parts, even though I've read a lot posters who weren't into them and I understand their points.

What really irks though, is that "Invincible" completely ignores the fact that "Revelation" exists. It's like Denning didn't read "Revelation", talk to Travis, or look at a synopsis. The friendship between Mirta and Jaina was well thought out, believable and added to the story. Dropping it is like Han and Luke acting like they had never been friends.

Jaina's whole point in going to Mandalore was to prepare herself mentally, emotionally and tactically for confronting Jacen, with Luke's understanding and approval before she left. So in "Invincible" they act like they just came up with the idea.

Ben and Leia going to meet Shevu on Coruscant at the start made no sense. This seemed to just be a way to include them in a story they already had finished their roles. They didn't need any more evidence, Jacen was either a dark-sider or he wasn't, that was already established and there was already enough reason to take him out.

The whole book bugs me with crap like this, backtracking, rewriting, ignoring, retconning, and then it doesn't really have any redeeming features of it's own, it's not exciting or satisfying or clever. There's no emotion when jacen goes down, he just falls and that's it, the story's over. Who cares about the rest of the galaxy? The galaxy was apparently just a prop to set up Jacen's story, and then we end Jacen's story with a whimper instead of a bang.

The last book really killed it for me, the rest of series varied from decent to exciting, but reading "Invincible" was like reading angry fan-fic, like someone hated the published novels and wrote themselves some crap to retcon everything.
 
Revelation was the worst book in the series, so I didn't mind that Denning pretty much ignored it.
 
Like I said, if there are reasons you didn't like it, that's your right, but for Denning to ignore it is bad writing on his part, it's a bad editorial decision, it's bad co-ordination between the authors.

I found "Invincible" to be a crap book irrespective of "Revelation", for reasons given, and would have preferred some other author to end the series.
 
What really irks though, is that "Invincible" completely ignores the fact that "Revelation" exists. It's like Denning didn't read "Revelation", talk to Travis, or look at a synopsis.
Denning wouldn't have had time to read Revelation before writing Invincible; they would've been written more-or-less simultaneously. He would have had Karen Traviss's original proposal to work from, but there's no guarantee that those elements you listed were actually in it.
 
Anyone read Luke Skywalker and the Shadows of Mindor (is there a thread about it I missed?)? I was browsing theforce.net forums, it seems to be getting glowing reviews from the Star Wars fans over there.

I will probably pick it up on my lunch break tomorrow.
 
Anyone read Luke Skywalker and the Shadows of Mindor (is there a thread about it I missed?)? I was browsing theforce.net forums, it seems to be getting glowing reviews from the Star Wars fans over there.
Not a thread that I saw. But I loved it. If it's not the best Star Wars novel to date, then the best one is one of Stover's other books. :)
 
Anyone read Luke Skywalker and the Shadows of Mindor (is there a thread about it I missed?)? I was browsing theforce.net forums, it seems to be getting glowing reviews from the Star Wars fans over there.
Not a thread that I saw. But I loved it. If it's not the best Star Wars novel to date, then the best one is one of Stover's other books. :)

I don't know about that. Stover would have to work hard to top his novelization of REVENGE OF THE SITH. The scene where Anakin tells Mace about Palpatine's true identity for example. Stover handled that much better than Lucas did.
 
Anyone read Luke Skywalker and the Shadows of Mindor (is there a thread about it I missed?)? I was browsing theforce.net forums, it seems to be getting glowing reviews from the Star Wars fans over there.
Not a thread that I saw. But I loved it. If it's not the best Star Wars novel to date, then the best one is one of Stover's other books. :)

I'm just reading it now...so far so good :techman:
 
I'll probably pick up LSatSoM later this week. I hate buying hardcovers, but sometimes I'm willing to make an exception. :D

As for the Revelation/Invincible issue, Karen Traviss is an extremely fast writer, and typically had her first drafts submitted before Allston (who was writing the books before hers) had finished his own. This is another reason why the round robin idea just doesn't work. You can't write a cohesive story like that.
 
Probably starting Shadows of Mindor tonight before going to bed. Should have it done by the end of the week and will join in whatever thread is on it then :D
 
I don't think anyone answered my question about whether the Yoda CW novel (not the comic), Labyrinth of Evil, and the ROTS novel were any good (I've had those sitting on my self since they first came out)? I've actually had them longer, so at this point I might actually read them first if they are better.
 
Oh, sorry, missed that. I haven't read Dark Rendezvous, but I've heard good things about it. Labyrinth of Evil was decent. I also haven't read Revenge of the Sith, but from what I've heard it's an excellent read and improves upon the movie in some aspects.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top