And had Lucas stuck to strictly telling the story on that poster, the PT would have been outstanding.
And yet they were the focus of all three crawls and the vast majority of screen time. Anakin's story was the B story. That was the problem.
More to the point, the originals were about Luke and other stuff. The PT was about other stuff and Anakin.
So?
Neither of those things change my point.
No, they're not. The first three movies are Luke's story. Only the prequels are Anakin's.The first six movies are Anakin's story. The really important question for the new movies is who's story is it?So?
Neither of those things change my point.
Not according to Lucas.. The son must help forward the father's redemption. This is what is achieved in the three movies, finally happening at the end of Jedi.No, they're not. The first three movies are Luke's story. Only the prequels are Anakin's.The first six movies are Anakin's story. The really important question for the new movies is who's story is it?So?
Neither of those things change my point.
Pure marketing with no regard for the series' actual narrative. Note that this suggestion was only ever pushed during the prequels' heyday. Anakin served as a cautionary tale, and represented one possible path Luke could have taken, but chose not to because he proved to be stronger than his father was.Not according to Lucas.. The son must help forward the father's redemption. This is what is achieved in the three movies, finally happening at the end of Jedi.No, they're not. The first three movies are Luke's story. Only the prequels are Anakin's.The first six movies are Anakin's story. The really important question for the new movies is who's story is it?
Well, I'm sure marketing had something to do with it ... but I also think Lucas' efforts with the PT were, in large part, a deliberate attempt to frame his entire six-film saga as Anakin's story. Personally speaking, I certainly can accept that as the intent. Whether the intent translates into a result that works for an individual viewer ... well ... as with most things ... YMMV.Pure marketing with no regard for the series' actual narrative. Note that this suggestion was only ever pushed during the prequels' heyday. Anakin served as a cautionary tale, and represented one possible path Luke could have taken, but chose not to because he proved to be stronger than his father was.Not according to Lucas.. The son must help forward the father's redemption. This is what is achieved in the three movies, finally happening at the end of Jedi.No, they're not. The first three movies are Luke's story. Only the prequels are Anakin's.
Not true (at least universally speaking for every possible audience member - it may be so for you, which is perfectly valid, btw). Anakin's story may represent the overall arc of the saga (per Lucas' stated intent) but that doesn't necessarily require Anakin/Vader doesn't take a role of prominence in each an every (or even most) episodes (or for a viewer to read more into the OT than is already there). He's a common denominator as events in the galaxy unfold around him - and because of him. That makes him central to the overall tale, without making him explicitly central to every episode.For the six film saga to represent a single narrative in which Anakin is the main character throughout, one would, for starters, have to imagine that the OT films are something other than what exists in the can.
Not true (at least universally speaking for every possible audience member - it may be so for you, which is perfectly valid, btw).For the six film saga to represent a single narrative in which Anakin is the main character throughout, one would, for starters, have to imagine that the OT films are something other than what exists in the can.
Not true (at least universally speaking for every possible audience member - it may be so for you, which is perfectly valid, btw).For the six film saga to represent a single narrative in which Anakin is the main character throughout, one would, for starters, have to imagine that the OT films are something other than what exists in the can.
I suppose that if one adopts a sufficiently non-standard idea of what constitutes a main character in a narrative, anything is possible.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.