• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Wars: Episode VII: The Nerd Rage Awakens

It'll be interesting though when Avatar 2 comes out, if the public still wants it. By that point it will have been close to ten years since the first one and a SHIT TON of other properties will be maturing and taking up ADHD brain space.

We shall see.
 
It'll be interesting though when Avatar 2 comes out, if the public still wants it. By that point it will have been close to ten years since the first one and a SHIT TON of other properties will be maturing and taking up ADHD brain space.

We shall see.

My belief is that Cameron is absolutely insane to be making Avatar 2 and 3, but as I just mentioned, he has made a career of defying expectations and making quality films that are unbelievably successful and enduring. The Abyss is still one of my favorite sci fi films and it was totally supposed to bomb.
 
I'm also very curious to see how the Avatar sequels do. But if anyone knows how to make an amazing sequel that defies expectations and improves on the original, it's Cameron. Aliens. Terminator 2. Avatar 2/3/4.

It certainly doesn't hurt that Avatar is getting its own brand new land at Disney World. :D
 
It will be interesting to see what the response is once they start really working on Avatar 2/3 and when we start getting trailers and such. Usually I wouldn't expect to much since it's been so long since the first one came out, but at the same time the wait could have just raised the anticipation and actually make them an even bigger deal than they would have been if they came out sooner.
 
See and i fully expect TFA to break at least the opening weekend record.. that movie is so hotly anticipated by fans and mainstream people alike and it's one of the biggest merchandise juggernauts there ever was.

It will break the U.S. record, unless there is massive bad weather on opening weekend.
 
It will be interesting to see what the response is once they start really working on Avatar 2/3 and when we start getting trailers and such. Usually I wouldn't expect to much since it's been so long since the first one came out, but at the same time the wait could have just raised the anticipation and actually make them an even bigger deal than they would have been if they came out sooner.

That's one way of looking at it,

Of course, there's also the massive backlash that's grown since Dec. 2009 (which seems like a LONG time ago now!).

Personally, I think Avatar's 2 - 4 are going to under-perform.
 
I heard something in a department store that I'd not heard in a long, long time.

Star Wars music. Playing in a regular public space in rotation with the normal songs you hear everywhere. The original main theme and ending from A New Hope, and later, the Imperial March. I hadn't heard Star Wars music in a normal place since the Prequels ended, and that was only because the places I heard it were selling music or the older audio books and radio dramas.
 
The only thing that will hurt the numbers is that Star Wars isn't quite the international phenomenon, it's more popular in the US. The Prequel's international grosses were only 55%, 52%, and 53%.

International money is where the big numbers come from nowadays. Jurassic World did 60% of its business internationally. Ultron did 67%. Furious Seven did 76%!
 
The name of the SD has been revealed as Finalizer.

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Star-Wars-Force-Awakens-Star-Destroyer-Has-Terrifying-Name-79827.html

I am good with the name. Real world navies have named their ships with names that seem silly upon first reflection. The Royal Navy had HMS Supply and HMS Arrogant.

(I do not consider the name of a ship as a spoiler. I believe it is assumed that the ship has a name, and the existence of the ship has been known since its appearance in the trailer.)
 
I think Finalizer is a great name for something with that much fire power that Kills things.


I guess I'm naïve, I assumed that Star Wars was going to be the highest grossing movie this year and break all of the records for opening, length in the theater, grosses and what have you.
 
The original premier was suppose to be this summer. Which would guarantee a bigger opening. Supposedly the lack of a script and Abrams going with Kasdan is what forced a delay. So I guess they can blame Abrams if the movie underperforms.
 
...the Marvel movies (Raimi's Spider-Man, the MCU films), Avatar, the Nolan Batman movies, etc.. So, you're saying the prequels captured the public's interest over that?
But that wasn't your argument.

Your argument was Star Wars isn't the biggest thing in sci-fi anymore.

Not only is it still the biggest thing in sci-fi, it's the biggest thing. Period.

There is nothing else in history that has ever (or will ever) compare to it.

Hit the brakes--if Star Wars was bigger, then E.T. would have failed to outperform each of the original trilogy films--back at a time when Star Wars was more culturally relevant (as a new event in film).

If SW was the biggest thing, then all of the fantasy franchises mentioned yesterday would fail to leave SW in the cultural / financial dust. The number of films doing this removes the idea of fluke or coincidence. Only die hard SW fans argue the opposite. Again, the Nolan Bat-films, Avatar, the Marvel movies, and most of the LOTR out performed the prequels (ex. Return of the King beyond the most successful prequel--The Phantom Menace).

This is not 1977-early '82 when SW had an edge, and until E.T., everyone else was playing catch-up on capturing the majority of audiences interested in big-screen fantasy/sci-fi film making.
 
The name of the SD has been revealed as Finalizer.

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Star-Wars-Force-Awakens-Star-Destroyer-Has-Terrifying-Name-79827.html

I am good with the name. Real world navies have named their ships with names that seem silly upon first reflection. The Royal Navy had HMS Supply and HMS Arrogant.

I like it, but I have to admit the first thing that popped into my head was that it sounded like a bad parody of The Equalizer.

q6IQby0.gif
 
martok2112 said:
Official Star Wars material states the Falcon (indeed many ships) have backup hyperdrives.

If that material predates the "Great Decanonization", it isn't official anymore.

Venardhi said:
Lets say that light speed in the Galaxy Far Far Away is measured along the lines of the Richter Scale, as a base ten logarithmic progression. ".5 past light speed" would therefore be 5 times the speed of light and put the Falcon's non-hyperdrive engines likely capable of carrying them from the Anoat system to Bespin within a few weeks or (more likely) a few months as long as they were fairly close stellar neighbors. No need for a backup hyperdrive, and no need for overly complicated star or planetary systems to explain their proximity.

When they "make the jump to lightspeed" that's when they go into hyperspace. Thus ".5 past lightspeed" does not refer to something accomplished by the non-hyperdrive ( aka sublight ) engines.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top