• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Star Wars Books Thread

Also, the process in which EU authors write licensed works has not changed. Either the author or Lucasfilm has an idea for a story, the author and the story group meet and discuss ideas. The author sets about his/her task, then has their editor edit the book, then submits it to Lucasfilm for editing or revisions.
There appears to be a greater awareness of what storylines to explore, and what can and can't be included. Versus Lucas era who was very hands off and didn't care and the guidelines seemed more loose.

I might be wrong, but that seems to be more the process, at least to me.
 
In the old days there were still some topics or plotlines that were considered off limits, at least according to one of the authors who's done books for them both pre- and post-Disney sale.

Reverend said:
I think some people misinterpret the purpose of the holocron's "tiered canon" system.

The tiered system simply meant that books ( for example ) were considered canon, except when and if they conflicted with the films. In theory books shouldn't be allowed to retcon movies.
 
There's a Star Wars podcast I heard a year or so ago, called "Coffee with Kenobi" and they interviewed James Luceno(who wrote in both the prequel era and post rotj era, and in the new canon. His most famous SW novel is probably "Darth Plaguies). The interview is about his book "Tarkin." I was going to transcribe the pertinent bits of conversation, but it turns out, it's all in the first 7 minutes.

They ask him about the process of putting together a novel with Lucasfilm under Disney, and how things have changed under the story group. He says nothing's changed, there's a few new faces at the story group, there always was a story group, the process is the same and very casual, etc, etc.

He's a really nice guy and a good author, and it's a really good interview. I recommend:bolian:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Lucas himself was mostly hands off with the books. There are exceptions, like he was more heavily involved with the larger multi media project stories, such as "Shadows of the Empire," or the movie novelizations, or unique novels like "Darth Plagueis," but there was a team of people working together, and with authors, to create stories in a continuity.
 
No, Legends is not canon. At all.
You misunderstand. I'm saying that Legends is the equivalent of, and acts in the same capacity as "S-Canon"(secondary canon) used to. S-canon was most of the material prior to the thrawn books, like the old marvel star wars, and other works from the 80's. It acted as a resource for authors to draw from. They could pick and choose material, if they wanted, and put it into continuity(C-canon/continuity canon)

This is exactly how Legends material is being used now.
 
Last edited:
Read the majority of the Prime timeline books and they are way more interesting than the Disney timeline ones. It’s such a shame they won’t release Sword of the Jedi and continue that line. At least the characters do interesting things there.
 
I have you read any of the new stuff?
Some of the post-Endor stuff that came out after TFA. In terms of quality of writing, coherent storyline and characters you actually understand, I give it 1/2 a star. "Unimpressed" to say the least; although it could just be that particular author, as the library had very little Star Wars selection.
I've been taking out the graphic novels omnibus books and those are (mostly) great!

The only Thrawn story I have not (yet) read was his "Discovery" by the Empire; I've been searching for it and if anyone knows where I can get my hands on it... :)
 
Read the majority of the Prime timeline books and they are way more interesting than the Disney timeline ones. It’s such a shame they won’t release Sword of the Jedi and continue that line. At least the characters do interesting things there.
Prime timeline? That's a Star Trek term, the official name for the pre-Disney EU stuff is Legends. They even have a big banner on the top of all of the books and comics that says it on it.
 
Prime timeline? That's a Star Trek term, the official name for the pre-Disney EU stuff is Legends. They even have a big banner on the top of all of the books and comics that says it on it.
It's just a dig at Disney canon. Pay it no mind.
 
They've revealed what at least some of the TLJ novelization's deleted scenes will be. We'll be getting Han's funeral, some interaction between the Ticos, and more exploration of Canto Bight. Jason Fry, the book's author, worked with Rian Johnson, and they all come from stuff that he had wanted to put in the movie but wasn't able to.
IwVp8GX.png
 
They'll have flowery descriptions to take his place.

"The last of the rebels fortified their spirits, Laying close to the ground so covered in salt, it resembled the frigid white wastelands of Hoth. They awaited the enemy; the terrifying Kylo of Ren."
 
You misunderstand. I'm saying that Legends is the equivalent of, and acts in the same capacity as "S-Canon"(secondary canon) used to. S-canon was most of the material prior to the thrawn books, like the old marvel star wars, and other works from the 80's. It acted as a resource for authors to draw from. They could pick and choose material, if they wanted, and put it into continuity(C-canon/continuity canon)

This is exactly how Legends material is being used now.

Not quite. S-canon was a category for stuff that may not quite fit and so could be affirmed as fully canonical or refuted as non-canon by future projects. Canon borrowing elements from Legends does not re-canonize the works, only the specific elements. S-canon had an inherent degree of canonicity. Legends does not have any canonicity at all.
 
This applies to the thread since a majority of the EU was Novels and Books, it's a good watch and is pretty much true based on what I've read over the years.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
This applies to the thread since a majority of the EU was Novels and Books, it's a good watch and is pretty much true based on what I've read over the years.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
That's more or less what I've been saying for years now, but some people just refuse to listen, facts be damned!
The EU was always little more than licenced fan fiction and there's nothing inherently wrong with that!

The ironic part is that from what I've seen, the fans that bitch the most about the state of the franchise under Disney and lament that everything was so much better under Lucas seem to be the very same ones that incessantly bitched about Lucas's decisions.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top